IMPROVING THE STUDENTS VOCABULARY MASTERY [600383]
i
IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY
THROUGH DIRECT INSTRUCTION
(A Classroom Action Resea rch on The fourth Grade of SD Negeri Pringanom
3, Masaran, Sragen in the Academic Year of 2009/2010)
A THESIS
Written by:
BUDI SETIAWAN
X2208508
Submitt ed to Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret
University to Fulfill One of the Requirements for Getting the Undergraduate
Degree of Education in English Department
TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY
SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY
SURAKART A
2010
ii ABSTRACT
Budi Setiawan. X2208508. 2008. IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’
VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH DIRECT INSTRUCTION (A
Classroom Action Resea rch on The fourth Grade of SD Negeri Pringanom 3,
Masaran, Sragen in the Academic Year of 2009/2010) . A Thesis. Surakarta :
Teacher Training a nd Education Faculty Sebelas Maret University Surakarta.
2010
It is essential to lea rn vocabulary in order to suppo rt the mastery of
English skills. In fact, many of English learners of elementary level are often
faced with the problem of vocabulary mastery. The most c ommon factors that
become t he obstacles are the limited number of words mastered and the di fficulty
to memorize the mean ing of the words. Therefore , it is necessary for the teacher to
apply certain method or tec hnique to solve those problems and make students
interested to learn English.
This research is aimed to know whether the technique of using Direct
Instruction could improve the students’ vocabulary mastery and to describe what
happens during the implement ation of Direct Instruction in English learning at
the fourth grade of SD Negeri Pringanom 3, Masa ran, Sragen.
This research is a classroom action research. It was conducted at SD negeri
Pringanom 3, Masaran, Sragen. The writer conducted a classroom acti on research
from February, 1 2010 until February 27, 2010 at the fourth grade of SD Negeri
Pringanom 3, Masaran, Sragen in the academic year of 2009/2010. In this
research, the writer used the fourth grade stud ents as the subject of research. In
conducting this classroom action research, the writer divided the action into two
cycles and c arried out in four steps namely; p lanning the action,
implementation/action, observation and reflection.
The data of the research were collected by using some tec hniques . They
were qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques. Interview and
observation were the techniques for getting qualitative data. They were in the
form of recording and photographs. The data which were in the form of words
from the result of i nterview was called as recording, while photographs were the
authentic data in the form of visible pictures. The quantitative data included the
written tests taken before and after the cycles were implemented. Then the write r
compared the mean scores of e ach cycle from cycle 1 and cycle 2.
The result of the research shows that Direct Instruction technique can
improve the students’ vocabulary mastery. There was an improvement on the
mean score of the test . In the first cycle it was 60. 68 and improved to 68. 10 in
the second cycle. This technique could make the students pay attention to the
lesson properly. It also improved students’ participation in learning vocabulary.
They were not shy anymore and highly motivated to join the instructional
process . The English teachers who want to apply direct instruction in English
teaching should consider the lesson sequence that must be done orderly consisting
of orientation, presentation, guided practice, structured practice and independent
practice in order to ma ke the instructional process run well.
iii APPROVAL
This thesis has been approved by the consultants to be examined by the board of
Examiners of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret
University.
On : ……………………………………………………………………
By : ……………… ……………………………………………………
Consultant I
Drs. M. Asrori, M.Pd
NIP. 19601015 198702 1 001
Consultant II
Hefy Sulistyowaty, SS
NIP. 19781208 200112 2 002
iv APROVAL OF EXAMINERS
This thesis has been examined by the B oard of thesis examiners of
Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta and
accepted as one of the requirements for getting an Undergraduate Degree of
Education in English Department.
On : ………………………………………………………….
Date : …… …………………………………………………….
Board of examiners
1. Chairman :
Drs. Martono, M.A ( …………………. )
NIP. 19600301 198803 1 004
2. Secretary :
Drs. Suparno, M.Pd ( …………………. )
NIP.19511127 198601 1 001
3. Examiner I :
Drs. M. Asrori, M.Pd ( …………………. )
NIP. 19601015 198702 1 001
4. Examiner II :
Hefy Sulistyowaty, SS ( …………………. )
NIP. 19781208 200112 2 002
Teacher Training and Education Faculty
Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta
Dean
Prof. Dr. H. M Furqon Hidayatullah, M.Pd
NIP. 19600727 198702 1 001
v MOTTO
Ada hari “dimana tak semua harapanmu terpenuhi”
Ada hari “ dimana kebahagiaan seolah hanya ditakdirkan untuk orang lain bukan
untukmu”
Ada hari “dimana engkau merasa telah melakukan segalanya sebaik -baiknya,
mengikuti semua jalan Tuhan, tapi yang eng kau terima adalah duka cita”
Tapi jika engkau memilih menerima dengan besar hati dan bersyukur atas semua
“Keburukan” yang terjadi, di akhir hari nanti akan kau temukan bahwa sebenarnya
Allah hanya menguji……..
vi DEDICATION
This thesis is whole – heartedly
dedicated to:
ALLAH SWT
The prophet Muhammad SAW
My beloved mom and dad
My brother and sister
All the people
vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, The Most Merciful. Firstly, th e
writer would like to thank Allah SWT because of His blessing , the writer can
finish his thesis as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Undergraduate
Degree of education in English Department. Although there are many difficulties
faced by him, h e realizes that those are t he ways to reach success. There fore, he
would like to express his special gratitude to:
1. The Dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret
University Surakarta.
2. Drs. Martono, M.A the head of English Department of Teacher Traini ng and
Education Faculty.
3. Drs. M . Asrori, M.Pd as the first consultant for all his patience, guidance,
support, and time for the betterment of his thesis.
4. Mrs. Hevy Sulistyowati, SS as the second consultant for all her patience,
guidance, support, and time for the betterment of his thesis.
5. Sukardi, A.Ma,Pd as the head master of SD N P ringanom 3, Masaran, Sragen
for allowing him to carry out the research on the fourth grade class.
6. Mr. S umardi, A.Ma. Pd as the fourth grade teacher and observer during the
resea rch.
7. His beloved Bapak and Ibu’ for love, support, advice praying him all the time.
8. His beloved sister “ H2H ”, Hariyati and Hartini, for the support.
9. His friend Eling “ Ngepet ” for the f riendship and s illy Jokes which always
make him happy and cheer up.
10. His friend Nova “ Pepi” for the friendship and help.
11. The big family of English Depertement 08 Especially Lia “ tembem ”, Ika
“Stoner ”, Ika “ be2k ”, Tante Erna “ Ms. Pulsa ”, Heny, Yuchan, Monique, Elida
“So Sweet ”, Ratih, Indra, worowor, for the good time together.
12. His lovely best friends Cendol, Jekek, Lukman, Tompel .
viii 13. His families in SMART ENGLISH, juli “Jugil jumbleng ”, Dewi “Bune”,
Rahma “mamah” ,Mbak Rini “Umi”, Sidiq “Klemak -klemek man”, Mbak
Ana, and all the people that cannot be mentioned one by one, for the Joke,
stories and unforgettable moments shared together.
14. All of people who have helped him in completing this thesis.
Finally, the writer realized that this thesis is far from being perfect. The
writer gladly accepts the comment and suggestion for the bet terment of his thesis.
Surakarta , March 2010
Budi Setiawan
ix TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. …………. i
ABSTRACT ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. … ii
APPROVAL ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. … iii
MOTTO ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ……… v
DEDICATION ………………………….. ………………………….. …………………………. vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ………………………….. ………………………….. …………. vii
TABLE OF CONTENT ………………………….. ………………………….. …………….. ix
LIST OF APPENDICES ………………………….. ………………………….. ……………. xi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of The Study ………………………….. ………………….. 1
B. Problem Statement ………………………….. ………………………….. . 5
C. Objectives of The Study ………………………….. …………………… 6
D. Benefit of The Study ………………………….. ………………………… 7
CHAPTER II THEORETICAL REVIEW
A. Vocabulary Mastery ………………………….. …………………………. 8
1. The definition of Vocabulary mastery …………………………. 8
2. The Importance of Vocabulary ………………………….. ………. 11
3. Types of Vocabulary ………………………….. …………………….. 12
4. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary ………………………….. … 13
5. Problems in Teaching and Learning Vocabulary …………. 15
6. Technique in Teaching Vocabulary ………………………….. … 16
7. Teaching Vocabulary for Elementary School ………………. 18
B. The characteristic of Young Learner ………………………….. …… 20
C. Direct Instruction
1. Over viewing Dir ect Instruction ………………………….. …….. 22
2. Instructional Goals and Learners Outcomes …………………. 23
3. Learning Environ ment and Management – System ………. 26
4. Procedure of Applying Direct Instruction ……………………. 28
5. Media Used in Direct Instruction ……………………………….. 29
x
D. Rationale ………………………….. ………………………….. …………….. 31
E. Hyphot esis………………………….. ………………………….. …………………. 33
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Research Setting ………………………….. ………………………….. ….. 34
B. The subject of The Research ………………………….. ……………… 34
C. Research Methodology ………………………….. ……………………… 35
D. The Model of Action R esearch ………………………….. ………….. 36
E. The Procedure of Research ………………………….. ………………… 37
F. Tech nique in Collecting The Data ………………………….. ………. 39
G. Technique of Analyzing The Data ………………………….. ……… 40
CHAPTER IV R ESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION
A. Pre – Research ………………………….. ………………………….. …….. 41
B. Research Finding ………………………….. ………………………….. …. 43
1. Cycle 1 ………………………….. ………………………….. …………. 44
2. Cycle 2 ………………………….. ………………………….. …………. 54
C. Discussion ………………………….. ………………………….. ………….. 62
D. Hypothesis Testing ………………………….. ………………………….. . 65
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion ………………………….. ………………………….. ………….. 66
B. Implication ………………………….. ………………………….. ………….. 67
C. Suggestion ………………………….. ………………………….. ………….. 67
BIBLIOGRAPHY ………………………….. ………………………….. …………………….. 69
APPENDICES ………………………….. ………………………….. …………………………. 71
x
xi LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
XI
X
XI
XII
Research Schedule ………………………….. …………………………..
Pre – Research Observation ………………………… ……
The Draft of Interview (Pre – Research) …………………………..
Test of Pre and Post – Test Items ………………………….. …………………………..
Answer Key and Blue Print of Pre and Post Test Items …………………………..
Sample of Lesson Plan ………………………….. …………………………..
Mean Score ………………………….. ………………………….. …………………………..
Field Notes ………………………….. ………………………….. …………………………..
The Draft of Interview (After Conducting Cycle) …………………………..
Student’s Worksheet of Pre a nd Post – Test …………….
Sample of Photographs ………………………….. …………………………..
Legalization ………………………….. ………………………….. …………………………..
72
73
82
87
92
94
112
113
134
141
151
153
xii LIST OF TABLE
Table 1.1 ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. …. 25
Table 1.2 ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. …. 26
1 CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the study
English is one of the languages in the world used by many people in a lot of
countries. It is also recognized as the main language for communication with other
people from different countries and cultures. Due to the importance of English as
an international languag e, many people try to learn and master it as soon as
possible so that they will not find any difficulties in communicating with others
especially coming from abroad.
In Indonesia itself, the government has made some efforts to obtain human
resources who ar e able to understand and master English well. Nowadays, English
is not only taught for junior and senior high school students but also to the
elementary school students. It is done in order to get the young l earners of
elementary level to be familiar with English as soon as possible. English mastery
is a goal that wants to be ac hieved as the target besides two other languages
namely Indonesian and vernacular language. In English , there are four
components of language skills covering listening; speaking, rea ding and writing
that shoul d be learned by the learners deeply and appropriately . Those four skills
cannot be separated since they are integrated.
As a foreign language in Indonesia, English is seriously learned by many
people to have a good prospect to be the community of international world.
2
Depdikbud (1994: 1) states “ Bahasa Inggris adalah bahasa Internasional yang
perlu diajarkan untuk tujuan penyerapan dan pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan,
teknologi, dan seni budaya serta pengembangan hubungan antar bangs a”.
English in Elementary school is not compulsory subject but it is a local content as
stated in GBPP 1994: “bahasa inggris tidak wajib dilaksanakan di Sekolah Dasar,
melainkan diselenggarakan sebagai muatan lokal ”. (Depdikbud, 1994: 1) English
is taught from the first grade until the sixth grade as it is stated in GBPP 1994,
“Dalam pelaksanaan mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris sebagai kurikulum muatan
lokal digunakan pendekatan komunikatif, yaitu memberikan pengalaman langsung
bagi siswa untuk menggunakan bah asa inggris sebagai alat komunikasi.”
(Depdikbud, 1994: 4)
In order to support the mastery of English skills as mentioned above, it is
essential to learn vocabulary. It becomes a central part in English learning.
Vocabulary refers to a list or set of words for a particular language or a list or set
of words that individual speaker of a language might use (Hatch and Brown,
1995: 1). According to Haycraft in Hatch and Brown (1995: 370) vocab ulary is
defined into two kinds: receptive and productive vocabulary. Receptive
vocabulary is words that the students recognize and understand when they occur
in a context, but which he can not produce correctly. Productive vocabulary is
word which the students understand, can pronounce correctly and use
constructively in sp eaking and writing. Another expert, Paul Procter (1978:1229),
states that vocabulary is (a) all the words known to particular person, (b) the
special set of words used in a particular kind of work, business, etc., (c) a list of
3
words, usually in alphabeti cal order and with explanations of their meanings, less
complete than a dictionary. Vocabulary deals with words and meaning. Mastery
itself means the comprehensive knowledge. Vocabulary mastery is comprehensive
knowledge to recognize, understand, and produ ce stock of words and their
meaning. In line with this, Lado (1964: 117) argues that to clarify the idea of
vocabulary, three levels of vocabulary are distinguished, namely: (1) vocabulary
to operate the patterns and illustrate pronunciation of the languag e, (2) vocabulary
for communication in areas of wide currency, (3) esthetic and technical
vocabularies.
In reality, many people who learn English especially for the beginners level
are often faced with the problem of vocabulary mastery. They cannot just
comprehend and master it well. It is proved from the pre – research observation
done by the observer to the fourth grade students in SD Negeri Pringanom 3
Masaran, where the writer also becomes the English teacher there. Based on the
pre- research observation , the writer found that children as the learners face some
obstacles in mastering vocabulary. After actively taking a part in the instructional
process for several times, some problems come up dealing with vocabulary
mastery. The indicators are: (1) they have limited number of vocabularies, (2) it is
hard for them to memorize the meaning of words, (3) their score s of English tests
are low.
By considering the problems as mentioned above, the writer conducted more
observation to the students in the class to g et more information. By doing so, the
writer found some factors causing those problems. They are: (1) the teacher’s
4
way of teaching the material is conventional. Students are just asked to read,
repeat and write all the times. It can also be said that tea cher’s teaching technique
is less varied, (2) the students assume that English is a difficult subject. It makes
their motivation be low and (3) they are bored with monotonous class’
atmosphere. After observing the instructional process at the fourth grade students
of SD Negeri Pringanom 3, it can be identified that several problems occurred
during the teaching – learning activity. They are: (1) The technique applied by the
teacher is not appropriate enough related to the topic or material, situation and
condition, (2) The teacher only focuses on the writing skill. The students are asked
to remember letter of words, write the words mentioned by the teacher, (3) The
students have no more chance to grasp the meaning or less challenge in finding
the meaning of w ords.
From all the explanation above, it can be concluded that the teacher applies a
less varied teaching technique in transferring materials. It affects on the students’
motivation in learning English. As a result, they are bored with the monotonous
class . Therefore, the writer proposes a technique to solve the problems called
direct instruction. It is not easy to teach English vocabulary to the primary school
students. The English words have to be introduced clearly to the students, so that
they can compr ehend them easily without mistakes. Teacher should teach and
expla in them clearly to the students to make them understand. Bender in Sylvia
Rockwell (1995: 54) defines d irect instruction as a teacher -led instructional
procedur e in that students are provide d with specific instructions on the task,
modeling, teacher -led practice, independ ent practice, and frequent feedback on
5
their performance. It establishes clearly defined parameters for lesson completion
and mastery as well as providing a success -oriented procedure with sample
practice and evaluation. It uses more controlled and repetitive delivery of
instruction. It provides teachers with strict guidelines for lesson presentation, their
introduction of successive skills, and the use of support materials or lesson
variations.
Based on the background above, the writer intends to conduct an action
research entitled Improving the S tudents’ Vocabulary Mastery through Direct
Instruction ( A Classroom Action Research on the Fourth Gra de of SD
Negeri Pringanom 3 , Masaran , Sragen in the Academic Year of 2009/ 2010 ).
B. Problem Statement
From the observation above the researcher formulate the
problem s of this research as follows:
1. Can direct instruction improve the vocabulary mastery of the fourth grade
students of SDN Pringanom 3 Masaran, Sragen in the Academic year of
2009/ 2010?
2. What happens during the implementation of direct instruction technique
in teaching vocabulary?
6
C. Objectives of the Study
The objectives of the study are:
1. To identify whether direct instruction can improve the vocabulary mastery
of the fourth grade students of SD N Pringanom 3 Masaran in Academic
Year of 2009/ 2010
2. To describe what happens during the implementation of direct instruction
in teaching vocabulary to the fourth grade stud ents of SD N Pringanom 3
Masaran in Academic Year of 2009/ 2010
D. Benefit of the Study
It is hoped that this study will give advantages to:
1. The Students
For the students, hopefully, it can provide information about vocabulary.
Therefore, they will hav e more understanding about it. They know the
importance of vocabulary and elaborate the meaning. Moreover, they can
identify and anticipate their difficulties of vocabulary learning.
2. The Teacher
For the teachers, it gives some information about the t echnique of teaching
vocabulary and students’ difficulties in learning. These enable them to
understand the core of teaching English vocabulary, know factors that
7
cause the difficulties in learning vocabulary, and determine appropriate
steps to overcome th e problems.
3. The school
After conducting this research, it is expected that the school will be
interest ed to conduct this research in his department in order to improve
teacher’s quality. It can also be used as the reflection in order to gain an
effective and innovative teaching – learning process by applying direct
instruction as one of the technique to improve student’s vocabulary
mastery.
8 CHAPTER II
THEORETICAL REVIEW
A. Vocabulary Mastery
1. The Definition of Vocabulary Mastery
There are many definit ions of vocabulary proposed by some experts. It is
very important for one to know what vocab ulary is before discussing vocabulary
mastery. Mastering a large number of vocabularies is very important for foreign
language learners. Without mastering it, of co urse, foreign language learners will
get some difficulties in developing the four language skills. According to Hatch
and Brown (1995: 1), the term vocabulary refers to a list or set of words for
particular language or a list of words that individual sp eakers of language use .
Since vocabulary is a list, the only system involved is that alphabetical order. The
choice in vocabulary selection and methods used in teaching vocabulary are
important factors. It needs the process of learning in context to get the m eaning of
words as stated by Allen French (1983: 4). Vocabulary is a fundamental
component of second language profi ciency; one of the primary goals of language
learning is to know the meanings of the words. It is needed to communicate
successfully in the s econd language. Hornby (1995: 985) states that vocabulary is
the total number of the words (with their meaning and wit h rules for combining
them) making up the language. Burns and Broma n (1975: 295) define that
vocabulary is the stock of words used by a pe rson, class or professional, all having
9
much in common, yet each distinctly different. The primary thing in learning a
language is the acquisition of a vocabulary. Therefore, success in learning English
requires vocabulary acquisition. A large vocabulary c an no t guarantee the
learner’s compe tence in learning English but in adequacy of vocabulary will
obstruct their chances to make success in learning English. Rivers in Nunan
(1998: p. 117), argues that the acquisition of an adequate vocabulary is essential
for successful second language use because without an extensive vocabulary, one
will be unable to use the structures and functions one may have learned for
comprehensible communication. The importance of mastering vocabulary in
learning is also stated by N unan. Nunan (1998: p. 118) says that, the development
of a rich vocabulary is an important element in the acquisition of a second
language.
From the definition above, it can be concluded that vocabulary is the total
numbers of words, a list or set of word s in a particular language that a person
knows or uses.
Swannel (1994: p 656) defines mastery as comprehensive knowledge or
use of a subject or instr ument. Meanwhile Porter (2001: p. 953) states that
mastery is learning or understanding something complete ly and having no
difficulty in using it. Mastery is defined as the complete control of knowledge
(Oxford Advanced Dictionary). This definition is supported by Hornby (1984:
777) who defines mastery as skill or thorough knowledge. From these definitions,
it comes to the conclusion that mastery means the competency to understand and
apply something learnt.
10
Vocabulary mastery is always being an essent ial part of English. Lewis
and Hill (1990: 12) say that vocabulary mastery is important for the students. It i s
more than gra mmar for communication purpose, p articularly in the early stage
when students are motivated to learn the basic words. Without having
proportional English vocabulary, students will get some difficulties in using
English. Vocabulary mastery ca n be measured by the requirements of
generalization (being able to define words) and application (selecting an
appropriate use of it). In addition, Schmitt and M cCharty (1997: 326) state
“Rec eptive and Productive knowledge may prove the only realistic way to
measure depth of vocabulary knowledge”. Receptive knowledge is words that the
learners recognize and understand when they occur in a context. While productive
knowledge relates to words which the learners understand, able to pronounce
correctly and use constructively in speaking and writing . Further, Madsen
(1983:12) states the purpose of vocabulary test is to measure the comprehension
and production of words used in speaking or writing. It can be said that
vocabulary mastery is a complete skill to under stand the stock of words and their
meanings of a particular language.
2. The Importance of V ocabulary
Vocabulary is one element of the language that should be learnt and
taught. It will be hard to master the language without mastering or understanding
a certain number of vocabularies. Vocabulary is the first step to be taught before
teaching other aspects of language. Zimmerman in Coady and Huckin (1997: 5)
11
states that vocabulary is central to language and critical importance to the typical
language learn er. McCharty (1990: Viii) states that the importance of vocabulary
in language learning is as follows: “no matter how successfully sounds of L 2 are
mastered, without words to express a wider range of meanings, communication in
an L 2 just can not happen in any meaningful way. According to Burns and Broman
(1975: 295) the position of an individual in society may be determined by the
extent of his knowledge of words and how to use them in manner appropriate to a
particular place, time, and situation.
Wilkin s (1982: 111) says that without grammar very little can be
conveyed; without vocabulary nothing can be conveyed. It has to be realized that
the student’s ability to read, to write, to listen, and to speak is conditioned by their
vocabulary. In reading abili ty, vocabulary helps learners in comprehending the
text. In writing, it helps them to expand their ideas based on the topic sentence
that they want. In listening, they comprehend and understand what other person
speaks. In speaking ability, vocabulary faci litates the learners to explain their
ideas orally. In addition, Coady and Huckin (1997: 5) argue that vocabulary is
central and critical importance to typical language learner. It makes vocabulary
becomes the basic element to master the four language ski lls, namely listening,
speaking, reading and writing. Without having adequate vocabulary, a language
learner will not be able to master the language skills. The meaning shows that
vocabulary mastery has important roles in communication.
12
3. Types of Voca bulary
Some experts have classified types of vocabulary. Shepher d (1980: 1)
classifies vocabulary into two kinds: a receptive vocabulary and expressive
vocabulary (productive vocabulary). Further, he defines the receptive vocabulary
as the words known whe n the learner listens and reads. The receptive vocabulary
is also called a passive process because the learner only receives thought from
others. In language application, the receptive vocabulary is considered as the basic
vocabulary. Later, expressive voc abulary is defined as the words used when the
learner speaks and writes. Harmer (1998 : 159) adds that active vocabulary refers
to vocab ulary that students have been to ught or learnt and which the students will
recognize when they meet then but which they w ill probably not be able to
produce.
Haycra ft quoted by Hatch & Brown (1995 ) divides two kinds of
vocabulary, namely receptive and productive vocabulary.
a. Receptive Vocabulary
Receptive vocabulary is words that the learners recognize and understand
when they occur in context, but which can not produce correctly. It is vocabulary
that the learners recognize when they see it in reading context but do not use it in
speaking and writing. The receptive vocabulary is also called a passive process
because the l earner only receives thought form others. In language application, the
recep tive vocabulary is considered the basic vocabulary. It is much larger than
productive vocabulary because there are many words recognized when the learner
hears or reads but do not use when he speaks or writes. In these respects, Richards
13
and Rodgers (1987: 308) give a profound explanation that the listening
vocabulary is larger than speaking vocabulary and similarly to the reading
vocabulary that is relatively larger than writing vo cabulary.
b. Productive Vocabulary
Productive Vocabulary is the words, which the learners understand, can
pronounce correctly, and use constructively in speaking and writing. It involves
what is needed for receptive vocabulary plus the ability to speak or write the
appropriate time. Therefore, productive vocabulary can be addressed as an active
process, b ecause the learners can produce the words to express their thought to
others.
4. Teaching and learning vocabulary
a. Vocabulary Strategy
It is importa nt to know about learner’s strategies. Brown and Payne (in
Hatch & Brown, 1995: 373) mention five essential steps in vocabulary learning
that represent what learners must do. The five steps are: “(1) having sou rces for
encountering new words, (2) g etting a clear image, either visual or auditory or
both, for the forms of the new words , (3) l earning the meaning of the words, (4)
making a strong memory connection between the forms and meanings of the
words; and (5) u sing the words. Schmitt and McCharty (1997) divide the
taxonomy of vocabulary learning strategies into four groups, namely:
14
1) Discovery Strategies
In this stage, when learners do not know the words, they must
discover their meaning by guessing from structural knowledge of
the language.
2) Social Strategies
A second way to discover new meaning employs the social strategy
of asking someone who knows. Teachers are often in this position.
They can be asked to help in a variety of ways. They can be asked
to help in a variety of ways: giving the L 1 tran slation, giving a
synonym, definition, and paraphrase.
3) Memory Strategies
Most memory strategies involve relating the word to be retained
with some previously learners’ knowledge, using some from of
imagery or grouping. The strategies used in this stage are pictures/
imagery, related words, unrelated words, grouping, etc.
4) Cognitive Strategies
Language strategies in this taxonomy are similar to memory
strategies, but are not focused specially on manipulative mental
processing; they include sorting, clas sifying, comparing,
predicating, repeating and using mechanical means to study
vocabulary.
15
5. Problems in teaching and learning vocabulary
There are some problems in learning vocabulary faced by the students.
Roger (1995: 43) states that the ease or dif ficulty of vocabulary item s depends on
a number of factors. They are:
a. Similarity to L1
The difficulty of vocabulary items often depends on how a similar item is
in form and meaning to the students’ first language. There are many
examples of these: someo ne described as sensible in English will be
understood sensitive by many European and if you say an embarrased to a
a Spanish speaker, they may will think that you are expecting a baby.
b. Similarity to English words already known
Once the students hav e some English words that relate to an English wor d
that they are already familiar which is easier than one, which is not. For
example, if students have already met the word friendly , they should be
able to guess the meaning of unfriendly .
c. Connotation
Connotation of the word is another difficult aspect that the learners have to
get to grip. For example, either skinny or slim could be used to describe
someone who is thin. But these two words have very different in their
connotation and by choosing one of them however; the speaker actually
conveys a particular attitude. Skinny is negative connotation, while slim is
positive connotation.
16
d. Spelling and pronunciation
The spelling of English word can cause problems for students who speak
languages with very regular spelling systems. Particular spelling patterns
can also cause confusion where the pronunciation concerned. For example:
through, though, tough.
e. Multi – word items
A lexical item may consist of more than one word, as in a compound like
tennis sho es, or rally car or a phrasal verb such as to put some one up .
f. Collocation
How a lexical item collocates can also cause difficulty. For example we
say that people injured or wounded but things are damaged .
6. Techniques in Teaching Vocabulary
There ma ny kinds of techniques that can be applied in teaching
vocabulary. Allen (1983) mentions some techniques of vocabulary teaching that
can be prepared and chosen as follows:
a) Demonstration
The technique, which belongs to demonstration, is gesture and
action performing. The teacher can use real objects and command.
Teacher may demonstrate the material using of real objects
available in the classroom such as door, windows, clock, desk, etc.
when use a command technique, teacher may ask students to do
something such as touching the pen, pointing the picture and so on.
17
b) Visual aids
Visual means something visible. Teacher may use visual aids in the
teaching of vocabulary to enable students to observe and identify
the objects vividly. Beside that, visualization may i nterest the
students in their learning vocabulary.
c) Verbal Explanation
Verbal explanation can be carried out through definition and
translation. Allen (1983) states that teacher can use explanation in
the students’ own language, definitions in simple Englis h, and
using vocabulary that students have already known to show the
meaning. For instance, the word ‘umbrella’ can be introduced by
explaining what it looks like and when the people usually use it.
d) Word List
When using word list technique, teacher should pay attention to
vocabulary selection. The words taught should relate and
appropriate to the students need and relate to their level.
From all the explanations above, it can be concluded that vocabulary is
stock of words used by a person or class. It cont ains list or set of words for a
particular language. The vocabulary taught in an elementary level has some
characteristics such as: simple, recognizable, interesting and can be found in the
nearest environment or classroom. Referring to the syllabus for th e fourth grade
students of elementary school which is as the limitation of vocabulary area
presented in this thesis, it includes the topic of “Things around us” and the sub
18
topic is “Objects in the classroom" that can be taught through instruction. The
terms of instruction will be various depending on the combination between the
certain object and its instruction such as: open your book, take your pen etc.
7. Teaching Vocabulary for Elementary School Students
Teaching vocabulary in early stage or in the primary school is very
essential. Teacher should give certain attention in teaching vocabulary and decide
the area of words that become the basic need for the pupil. Burns and Broman say
that the teacher must give attention to develop the vocabularies of each child
through carefully planned instruction , and to do so, he or she must be aware of
what words are (verbal representation of concept) and how they are formed (1975:
p. 295). Huebener states the similar opinion about the area of vocabularies that is
taught for the first level. Huebener says that: “selection from 750 -800 words for
the first year may be grouped under some forty of fifty headings. Starting with the
immediate situation these may be school, the lesson, language, the family,
relatives, prof ession, description of objects, animals, nature, men’s garments,
women garments, color, time, months, the days, the body, health, the house, daily
action, etc.”(1965:p . 87).
The material used in teaching vocabulary should be suitable with the
students’ need. Ohlen says that it is imperative that much of the material which
the teacher uses should be familiar to the child in his everyday life, the family,
nouns, colors, toys, animals, time, month, season, an so on (1961: p. 279). It can
be said that the E nglish material should be famil iar and suitable with students’
need.
19
English material for primary school contains four components: listening,
speaking, reading, and writing for the purpose that the students have the
communication skill with certain topic s which are appropriate with their
environment, as stated in GBPP Muatan Lokal Bahasa Inggris SD (1995: P. 2):
Muatan lokal Bahasa Inggris di Sekolah Dasar bertujuan agar siswa
memiliki ketrampilan menyimak, berbicara, membaca, dan menulis
sederhana dalam bahasa inggris dengan penekanan pada ketrampilan
komunikasi melalui topik yang dipilih kebutuhan lingkungan, antara
lain industri, pariwisata, dan prindustrian di provinsi Jawa Tengah .
Further explanation about the area of English materials for primary school
presented in the curriculum are about things, family, school, geography around
them , and student can communicate wi th their friends in their environment in
simple sentences. Those are also pointed out in GBPP Muatan Lokal Bahsa
Inggris SD:
Adapun ruang l ingkup pembelajaran muatan lokal Bahasa Inggris di
Sekolah dsar meliputi ungkapan – ungkapan dan kalimat – kalimat
sederhana mengenai:
1. benda di sekitar anak;
2. lingkungan keluarga;
3. lingkungan sekolah;
4. lingkungan geografis;
5. komunikasi anak dengan lingkungannya.
20
Based on the explanation above, it can be conclude d that the area of
vocabularies for t he first level (i.e. elementary) includes immidiate situation such
as: the school, the family, the home, actual experience with concrete object, daily
activity etc.
B. The Characteristics of Young Leaner
According to Scott and Ytreberg (1990: 1 – 4) the characteristics of Young
Language learners are as follows:
· They can plan activities
· They can argue for something and tell you why t hey think what they think
· They can use logical reasoning
· They can use their vivid imaginations
· They can use a wide range of intonation, patterns in their mother tongue
· They can und erstand direct human interaction
Other characteristics of the young learner s are:
· They know that the world is governed by rules. They may not always
understand the rules, but they know that they are there to be obeyed, and
the rules help to nurture a feeling of security
· They understand situations more quickly than they understand the
language used
· They use language skills long before they aware them
· Their own understanding comes through hands and eyes and ears. The
physical world is dominant at all times
21
· They are very logical – what you say first happens first
· They have very short attention and concentration span
There are also general characteristics of children around eight to ten years old.
Children of five are little children. Children of ten are relatively mature children
with an adult side and a childish side. Many of the char acteristics listed above will
be things of the past.
· Their basic concepts are formed. They have decided views of the world.
· They can tell the difference between fact and fiction.
· They ask questions all the time
· They rely on the spoken word as well as the p hysical world to convey and
understand meaning
· They are able to make some questions about their own learning
· They have definite views about what they like and don’t like doing
· They have a developed sense of fairness about what happens in the
classroom and begin to question the teacher’s decision
· They are able to work with others and learn form others.
Eight to ten years olds have a language with all the basic elements in
place. They are competent users of their mother tongue and in this connection
they are aware of the main rules of syntax in their own language. By the age of ten
children can:
· Understand abstracts
· Understand symbols (beginning with words)
· Generalize and systematize
22
This refers to children’s general language development. There are many
simil arities between learning one’s mother tongue and learning a foreign
language in spite of differences in age and the time available. So far no body
has found a universal pattern of language learning which everyone agrees
with. Much seems to depend on which mother tongue the pupils speak and on
social and emotional factors in the child’s background. What is clear here is
that most eight to ten years olds will have some sort of language awareness
and readiness which they bring with them into the foreign langua ge classroom.
C. Direct Instruction
1. Over viewing Direct Instruction
A general overview of the direct instruction model uses the analytical
scheme introduced in the introduction, which provides the following features:
· The model’s instructional goals and effects the model has on learners
including required assessment procedures.
· The model’s syntax or overall pattern and flow of instructional activity.
· The model’s learning environment and management system required to
make particular lessons employing it e ffective.
James M. Wolf (2000: 373) says that direct instruction has its theoretical
origins in the behavioral family, particularly in the thinking of training and
behavioral psychologists. Training psychologists have focused on training people
to perform complex behaviors that involve a high degree of precision and often
23
coordination with others – for example being a crew member on a submarine. Their
main contributions to learning situations are task definition and task analysis. The
instructional design pr inciples they propose focus on conceptualizing learner
performance into goals and tasks, breaking this into smaller component tasks,
developing training activities that ensure mastery of each subcomponent, and,
finally arranging the entire learning situati on into sequences that ensure adequate
transfer from one component to another and achievement of pre – requisite learning
before more advanced learning.
2. Instructional Goals and Learners Outcomes
Learning theories normally distinguish between two types of knowledge:
declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge (Marx & Winne, 1994; Ryle,
1949; Gagne, 1977; Gagne, 1985). Declarative (verbalizable) knowledge is
knowledge about something or that something is the case. Procedural knowledge,
on the other han d, is knowledge about how to do something. An example of
declarative knowledge is knowledge about the three branches of government: that
the legislative branch has two chambers (the house and senate) and that
representatives to the house are elected to 6 y ears terms. Procedural knowledge
about this same topic is knowledge about, if one is a citizen, how to got the
polling place and vote on Election Day and how to write a letter to a senator, how
to guide a bill through the senate until it becomes a law.
According to Arends (1997: 66) the direct instruction model was specially
designed to promote student learning of procedural knowledge and declarative
24
knowledge that is well structured and can be taught in a step – by- step fashion.
Table 1.1 illustrates ins tructional objectives aimed at promoting the acquired of
basic declarative knowledge and straightforward procedural knowledge and
compares this type of objective with those that promote social learning and
higher – level thinking.
Differences can be observ ed in the various types of objectives listed in
table 1.1. For instance, the first objective expects the student to be able to identify
the rules of ice hockey. This is important declarative knowledge for students who
wish to be involved in the game. Howev er, being able to identify the rules does
not mean that the student can perform any skills associated with hockey (like
passing on the move), the content of the procedural knowledge found in column 2.
Further, neither knowing the rules nor having specific hockey skills will
necessarily lead to being a good teammate or to bringing critical judgment to the
way the sport is conducted, the aim of the objectives found in column 3 and 4.
Direct instruction is a suitable approach to instruction when the teacher wa nts
students to learn particular skills or straightforward declarative knowledge such as
those found in columns 1 and 2. It is a teacher – centered model that has five steps:
set induction, demonstration, guided practice, feedback and extended practice.
There are five essential phases or steps in most direct instruction lesson. The
teacher begins the lesson by providing a rationale for the lesson, establishing set,
getting students ready to learn. This preparation and motivational phase is then
followed by p resentation of the subject’s matter being taught or demonstration of
a particular skill. The lesson concludes with opportunities for student’s practice
25
and teacher feedback on their progress. During the practice – feedback phase of
this model, teacher shoul d always try to provide opportunities for students to
transfer the knowledge or skill being taught to real life situations. The five phases
of the direct instruction models are summarized in table 1.2.
Table 1.1 Sample Direct Instruction Objectives Compare d To Social Learning
or Higher – level Thinking Objectives
Acquisition of
Basic
Knowledge Skill Acquisition Social
understanding Higher level
Students will be
able to list the
basic rules of
hockey Students will be
able to pass while
moving Students will
display
cooperation
while playing
a hockey game Students will
express an
opinion in
regard to the
presence of
violence in
hockey
Table 1.2 Syntax of the Direct Instruction Model
Phases Teacher Behavior
Phase 1 Teacher goes over objectives for the lesson,
Provide objective and gives background information and explains
Establish the set why the lesson is important. Get students
ready to learn.
26
Phase 2 Teacher demonstrates the skill correctly or
Demonstrate knowledge or presents step by step information
Skill
Phase 3 Teacher structures initial practice
Provide guided practice
Phase 4 Teacher checks to see if students are performing
Check understanding and correctly and provi des feedback.
Provide feedback
Phase 5 Teacher sets conditions for extended practice
Provide extended practice with attention to transfer to more complex and
and transfer real life situation.
3. Learning Environment and Management System
According to Arends (1997: 67) a direct Instruction lesson requires a most
careful structuring and orchestration by the teacher. To be effective, the model
necessitates that every det ail of the skill or content be carefully defined and that
the demonstration and practice session be carefully planned and executed. Even
though there are opportunities for teachers and students to jointly identify goals,
the model is primarily teacher dire cted. The teacher’s management system must
ensure student engagement, mainly through watching, listening, and structured
recitations. Lessons must proceed at a brisk pace and not get sluggish. This does
not mean that the learning environment and the manage ment system have to be
27
authoritarian, cold, or free of humor. It means that the environment is task
oriented and provides high expectations for student’s accomplishment.
The most prominent features are an academic focus, a high degree of
teacher direction and control, high expectations for pupil progress, a system for
managing time, and an atmosphere of relatively neutral effect (Wolf, 2000: 338).
Academic focus means one places highest priority on the assignment and
completion of academic tasks. During in struction academic activity is
emphasized; the use non – academic materials -for example toys, games, and
puzzles is deemphasized or even discouraged as in non academically oriented
student – teacher interaction, such as questions about self or discussions of
personal concern.
Teacher direction and control occur when the teacher selects and directs
learning tasks, maintains a central role during instruction, and minimizes the
amount of nonacademic pupil talk. Teachers who have high expectations for their
students and concern for academic progress demand academic excellence and
behavior conducive to academic progress.
A major goal of direct instruction is the maximation of student learning
time. Many teachers’ behaviors found to be associated with student achi evement
are in fact associated with student time on task and student rate of success, which
in turn are associated with student achievement. Thus, the behaviors incorporated
into direct instruction are designed to create a structured, academically oriented –
learning environment in which students are actively engaged (on task) during
instruction and are experiencing a high rate of success in the tasks they are given.
28
Rosenshine, Soar and Ragosta in James M. Wolf (2000: 338) state that
there is substantial e vidence that negative affect inhibit student achievement.
Teachers should create an academic focus and avoid such negative practice as
criticism of student behavior. Research is less clear on the role of positive affect
on student outcomes: some students m ay benefit more from large amounts of
praise than others; some types of praise are more effective than others.
In summary, the direct instruction environment is one in which there is a
predominant focus on learning and in which students are engaged in ac ademic
tasks a large percentage of time and achieve at a high rate of success.
4. Procedure of Applying Direct Instruction
According to Arends (1997: 82) direct instruction relies heavily on the
preposition that much of what is learned comes from observi ng others. The
behavior of others, both good and bad, thus becomes a guide for the learner’s own
behavior. Learning by imitation saves students much needles trial and error. The
teaching procedure of direct instruction is as follows:
1. Clarity of goals an d main points
a. State the goals or objectives of the presentation
b. Focus on one thought (point, direction) at a time
c. Avoid digressions
d. Avoid ambiguous phrases or pronouns.
2. Step – by- step presentations
a. Present the mat erial in small steps
29
b. Organize and present the material so that one point is mastered before the
next point is given
c. Give explicit, step – by- step directions (when possible)
d. Present an out line when the material is complex
3. Specific and concrete procedures
a. Model the skill or process
b. Give detailed and redundant explanations for difficult points
c. Provide students with concrete and varied examples
4. Checking for students’ understanding
a. Be sure that students understand one point before proceeding to the next
point
b. Asks students questions to monitor their comprehension of what has been
presented
c. Have students summarize the main points in their own words
d. R eteach the parts of the presentation that the students have difficulty
comprehending, either by further teacher explanation or by students tutoring
other students .
5. Media Used in Dirrect Instruction
In applying Direct Instruction in English teaching, there are some
media that can be used as aids to support the success of the teaching – learning
process. Arends (1997) divides those media into two groups, namely:
30
a. Visual Representation
Providing a visual represenation of the concept or skill along with
the verbal Explanation assists studentsin following the explanation. Later,
at other points in The learning process, the visual representation serves as
a cue or prompt. If the Students make incorrect response indicated lack of
understand ing, the teacher Provide hints or clues, such as referring back to
the visual representation. It is Important to probe for clarification and
improved answers.
b. Newsprint charts
Some teachers prefer newsprint chart because they can be made up
the night befor e. They can be posted on the wall, leaving the blackboard
for other use, and they can be stored for future use. They have some
functions such as: to increase understanding of a topic, add interest to a
subject, leghten the retention time of information, st imulate people to
action, and contribute to a desirable attitude.
Based on the theories of direct instruction as explained above, it can be
conclude d that direct instruction in this research has a goal to promote students’
learning of procedural knowledge and declarative knowledge. The knowledge
about something or that something is the case is called as declarative knowledge.
While knowledge about how to do something is a procedural knowledge. It is a
suitable technique when the teacher wants students to le arn particular skill. In
conducting a lesson with direct instruction, there will be several procedure
consisting of: clarity of goals and main points, step – by- step presentations,
31
specific and concrete procedures, and checking for students understanding. As the
teacher does teaching learning process with direct instruction to teach vocabulary
for the fourth grade students of elementary school level, there are some activities
done by the teacher. It involves a topic of “Things around us” as the limitation o f
vocabulary area with the sub topic of “objects in the classroom”. The
implementation of what the teacher does during the teaching learning process by
applying direct instruction in a real class includes several steps. Firstly, the
teacher explains about orientation and presentation. Here , the teacher provides the
objective of the lesson, describes the content of the lesson, discusses the
procedures of the lesson, and explain s the new concept by providing
demonst ration and examples. Structured practice and guided practice come next.
The teacher leads the students through practice examples such as; “Touch the
table!” , Hold your pen! etc . The teacher also gives students opportunity to
practice on their own as previously they did in a group work. The last is
independent practice. The students practice on their own assistance and with
delayed feedback from the teacher in how to do the instruction.
D. Rationale
Vocabulary becomes the significant part in learning second language. It is
used as the fundamental p oint in mastering language skill covering listening,
speaking, reading and writing. It is also important to be mastered since vocabulary
as a good store of words is crucial for making communication between two
speakers understandable each other.
32
Vocabular y mastery can not be separated from the second language
acquisition. It is used as a means to express what the learner intends to in the
target language. It can also be said that vocabulary mastery plays an important
role in language learning. In reading, i t helps the learners how to understand a text
and its content. In listening, they can make learners understandable each other as
they speak. In writing, by having enough vocabulary mastery, they can elaborate
their imagination, ideas based on the certain t opic as large as possible. While in
speaking, it helps the learners to explain their ideas or what they have in their
mind orally.
Dealing with the students’ vocabulary mastery, students of SD Negeri
Pringanom 3 Masaran at the fourth grade level have low vocabulary mastery.
There are some problems coming up as a sign that they still face some difficulties
in vocabulary mastery. Those problems are: the technique applied by the teacher
in not appropriate enough related to the topic or material, situation and condition,
the teacher’s focus which is only on writing skill and the less or even no more
chance for the students in grasping the meaning of words. In determining the
problems faced by the students in vocabulary mastery as mentioned above, it can
be seen from the indicators which come up during the observation covering: the
limitation number of vocabulary mastered by the students, their difficulty in
memorizing the meaning of words and the English tests score are low. Based on
the problems and indicators as explained above, there are some sources of
problem for the students in vocabulary mastery. They are: the conventional way of
33
the teacher in teaching the material, students’ assumption that English is a difficult
subject and the monotonous class’ atmosph ere.
In order to obtain successfulness in vocabulary teaching, a certain
technique is much needed to make it run well. As known, there are many
techniques that can be applied in teaching vocabulary. Direct Instruction is one of
the techniques that can be used in teaching vocabulary. It is specifically designed
to promote students’ learning of procedural knowledge and declarative knowledge
which consists of five phases covering: orientation, presentation, structured
practice, guided practice, and independen t practice. It provides language practice
in stimulating students in relevant way. By focusing on meaning through
movement rather than on language form studied in abstract way, direct instruction
reduces students’ stress and creates a positive mood of the learners. They will be
more active and directly involved in the classroom activity.
E. Hypothesis
Based on the rationale above, the hypothesis can be formulated as follows:
Teaching English by using Direct Instruction will improve students’ vocabular y.
34 CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Research Setting
The research was done in SD Negeri Pringanom 3 Masaran, Sragen. The
school is located in Jl. Sari – Masaran, Sragen. The resear ch was conducted from
1st February to 28th February. The research was held on Wednesday from 11.45
a.m. to 12.00 a.m. and on Friday from 09.15 a.m. to 10.00 a.m.
Related to the school’s physical appearance, it has good building and
supporting facilities. There are six classrooms, a teacher office, a headmaster
office, a com puter laboratory, a library, two bathrooms, a kitchen, two canteens
and a parking lot. Almost all of the rooms are equipped with fans and ceramic
tiles except for the first until third grade class. Overall, they are in good condition
and well maintained. T he surrounding atmosphere of this school can actually
support the teaching – learning process. It is far from the public area and main high
way.
B. The Subject of the Re search
The subject of this research was the fourth grade students of SDN
Pringanom 3, Masaran, Sragen. The fourth grade class consists of 29 students, 13
boys and 16 girls. There is always a rotation of their position, in which students
always move once a week. Related to the student’s background, most of them are
coming from the low econo my level. Their parents are mostly farmers and factory
35
workers . They also have low educational background; they only graduated from
elementary school s. They spend almost all of the time for working. It affects
students’ motivation in learning since there is less or even no control from their
parents.
C. Research Methodology
In conducting the study, the writer use d Action Research. There are some
definitions of action research proposed by some experts. Mills (2000) defines
action research as systematic i nquiry done by the teacher or other individuals in
teaching or learning environment to gather information about and subsequently
improve the ways their particular school operates, how they teach, and how their
students learn (P.5).
Anne Burns (1999: 30) s uggests a number of general features, which
characterize the action research. They are:
a. Action research is contextual, small – scale and localized – it defines and
investigates problems within a specific situation.
b. It is evaluative and reflecti ve as it aims to bring about change and
improvement in practice.
c. It is participatory as it provides for collaborative investigation by teams of
colleagues, practitioners and researchers.
d. Changes in practice are based on the collection of informatio n or data which
provides imputes for change.
36
Based on the definitions above, it can be concluded that action research is
the systematic study of efforts to overcome education problems for betterment
done by the teacher or in collaboration of teachers and researchers.
D. The Model of Action Research
The model of classroom action research used in this study is based on the
model developed by Kemmis and Mc Taggart (1985). There are four steps in this
model of action research in the following:
1. Identifying p roblems and planning the action
2. Implementing the action and observing or monitoring the action
3. Reflecting the result of the observation, and
4. Revising the plan for the following step.
This model can be illustrated in diagram below:
37
Step 1…………………………………
Step 2 ……………………………………….
E. The Procedure of Research
In this classroom action research, the action research was conducted
collaboratively. The t eacher of fourth grade class was the facilitator an d the
observer , and the writer was the researcher who implemented the action. In this
classroom action research, each procedure take six s teps that form one cycle. T hey
are as follows:
Plan
Reflection
Action &
Observation
Revised P lan
Reflection
Action &
Observation
Revised Plan
Reflection
Action &
Observation
38
1. Identifying the problem
The teacher identified the problems befor e planning the action. The
problems refer ed to student s’ difficulty in mastering vocabulary. The
fourth grade class teacher and the writer iden tified the problems by using
two techniques. They are:
a. Test
The writer made multiple choice tests of voca bulary as pre -test and
post-test to know the student s’ ability.
b. Observation and interviews
The writer observe d the students’ behavior, motivation and attitude
during the lesson and interview ed the fourth grade class teacher to
know the model of class management and students’ interaction.
2. Planning the action
There were some preparations that would be prepared by the writer related
to the action as follows:
a. Preparing the materials
b. Preparing sheets for classroom observation. It wa s prepared to know the
situation of teaching – learni ng process when the technique was applied.
c. Preparing teaching – aids for example picture, text – book etc.
d. Preparing a test
3. Implementing the action
The writer implement ed the teaching learning activity of vocabulary using
Direct Instruction based on the lesson plan made by him.
39
4. Observing/ monitoring the action
Observation is one of the instruments used in collecting the data. T he
fourth grade class teacher observe d all t he activities in teaching learni ng
process while the writer taught the students.
5. Reflecting the result of the observation
The fourth grade class teacher and the writer mad e an evaluation. The test
is in the form of:
a. Multiple choice test
In this test, the students would be asked to answer the questions in the
form of objective option.
6. Revising the plan
Based on the weaknesses of the activities that have been carried out using
direct instruction in teaching vocabulary, th e teacher and the writer revised
the plan for the next cycle. It wou ld take 2 cycles to overcome all students’
problem in vocabulary mastery.
F. Technique in Collecting the Data
In this classroom action research, the writer use d qualitative and
quantitative meth ods in collecting the data.
Qualitative methods include d observation and interview. The data were in
the form of words taken form the result of observation. It was done with his
collaborator to know the situation of the teachi ng learning process and stude nts’
40
behavior. Th e writer also use d interview to get some data both from the teacher
and students themselves . It was done in knowing the model of class management
and students’ interaction.
Quantitative methods include d written test that cover ed pre-test and post –
test. The data was in the form of numbers taken from the tests that was conducted
before and after the cycles done.
G. Technique of Analyzing the Data
To analyze the teaching and learning process, the writer investigated the
field notes by re- read the observation notes in form of words and reviewing the
photographs . The writer also conduct ed tests in the beginning and in the end of
each cycle. After conducting the test, the writer compared the student’s
vocabulary achievement in the pre – test an d pos t- test to know whether there is
improvement of students’ vocabulary or not. The mean score of pre – test and post –
test can be calculated with the formula:
NxxS=_
Which:
_
x = means of pre -test score
_
y = means of post -test score
N = number of sample
NyyS=_
41 CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION
In this chapter, the writer presents the result of the classroom action
research in improving students’ vocabulary maste ry through direct instruct ion to
the fourth grade of SDN Pringanom 3 , Masaran. It describes and discusses the
data collected from the research.
The research was conducted in collaboration with the class teacher of the
fourth grade who also becomes the Engl ish teacher in SDN Pringanom 3 . The
researcher was as the teacher who implemented the action , and the class teacher of
the fourth grade was the facilitator and observer. The research was conducted in
two sessions . The first was pre-search and the second wa s the implementation of
Action research.
A. Pre-Research
Pre-research was conducted before conducting the action research. It was
done in or der to identify the problems during the teaching learning process
dealing with students vocabulary mastery before usin g a new technique, to know
the technique applied by the teacher in teaching and to find out the students ’
respond to the lesson including their problems in learning English .
In gathering the data of p re-research wanted by the res earcher, there were
several ways done by him such as: interviewing the teacher , interviewing the
42
students , observing the teaching – learning process and giving pre -test to the
students.
Based on the interview and o bservation, in the pre -research, There are
some important information the researche r got . The English teacher of SDN
Pringanom 3 Masaran who taught from the fourth up to the sixth grade class was
actually the class teacher, m eaning that he has not got any related educational
background with English major. He has been there for about two years. Dealing
wit his major which is PGSD program, it affected the way of his teaching English .
He has less experience in applying method or technique in English teaching
especially to introduce new vocabulary to the students. Consequently, the teacher
used usual or less varied technique such as translation. He did the same way from
one meeting to the next meeting covering: e xplaining in Indonesian about some
vocabulary in target language, translating them in English, asking students to
repea t the words after him, and doing the tasks from the book.
From the interview, observation and pre -test it can be concluded that 1)
students got low vocabulary mastery, 2) Students got difficulties in m emorizing
the meaning of words 3) Students were bored with monotonous class atmosphere.
The students ’ problem as mentioned above , which were got from several
ways such as interview, observation and pre -test, came from the rising indicators
and some factors causing those problems during the teaching -learn ing p rocess.
The indicators were : (1) They have limitation number of vocabulary mastered, (2)
It was hard for them to memorize the meaning of words, (3) Their scores of
English tests were low. Those were mostly coming from the students’ point of
43
view. While som e factors came from the teacher him self such as : (1) The
technique applied by the te acher was not appropriate related to the topic or
material, situation and condition, (2) The teacher only focused on the writing skill.
The students were only asked to rem ember letter of words and wrote the
vocabularies mentioned by the teacher.
In order to overcome several problems above , the researcher decided to
bring about a new technique called Direct instruction in presenting and practicing
new vocabulary through clas sroom action research in order to improve students
vocabulary and to motivate them to be active and involved in the teaching
learning process.
B. Research Finding
The research implementation of using Direct Instruction in improving
students’ vocabulary was divided in two cycles. Every cycle was held in several
meetings. Both for the first and second cycle, the researcher took the same topic
which was about “at school” . The difference was on the material. For the first
cycle, it discussed “about things at scho ol” while on the second cycle, it talked
about “personnel at school” . It was held in February 3rd until 10th, 2010.
Meanwhile , the second cycle was held in February 17th until 23rd 2010.
Every cycle in this research consisted of series of steps, namely :
identifying the problem, planning the action, implementing the action, observing
or monitoring the action reflecting the result of the observation and revising the
plan.
The description of the research finding can be explained as follows:
44
1. Cycle I
a. Identifyin g the problem
The problems faced by the students were not far from the
vocabulary mastery. It was proved from their English scores which were
still low. Actually, they have learnt Eng lish since the third grade . It was
very hard for them to remember and gra sp the meaning easily. It was
getting worse since they have an assumption that English was difficult
subject . Unconsciously, it made their motivation in learning English
especially be low . Moreover, they also felt bored with the teaching
learning process d one by the teacher since they had the same activities
from one meeting to another one. The monotonous class atmosphere led
the students to become less active to participate in classroom teaching –
learning activities. They were reluctant to be involved in th e on- going
class. Moreover, t he teacher has less – patient in teaching the students . It
gave a bad impression to the stud ents. Finally, they preferred coming ,
sitting, listen ing and writing rather than doing something w rong and
getting punishment. On the o ther hand, the teacher did not try to improve
the situation by applying or using other methods or technique s in order to
gain students curiosity, participation and activeness relating to present and
practice new vocabulary. The teacher liked to have less n oisy students , so
that there would be less disturbance in teaching -learning activity.
45
b. Planning the action
Before the implementation of the action research, the writer
conducted pre -research. In the pre-research, the writer conducted interview
with the te acher, interview with some students, observing the teaching
learning activity done by the teacher and giving a pre -test. From the
observation, the writer found that the teacher only focused on writing
activity. Most of the time allotment was spent for taki ng some notes from
the b lackboard. It made the students passive. In this teacher -centered
model , students had less chance to take a part in the teaching learning
process. Another problem was the students’ difficulties in remembering,
grasping and pronounci ng the words. The monotonous class atmosphere
and students ’ behavior that were getting bored in the middle of teaching –
learning process were other problems seen by the writer. Based on pre –
research, the writer identified that the students’ vocabulary maste ry should
be improved by implementing a teaching le arning process that could
overco me the problems. Therefore, the writer designed the teaching
learning process through direct instruction.
Before implementing the action, the writer planned pre -test and
post-test to know the students vocabulary improvement before and after
action. The post test was given in the end of cycle, so that the writer knew
the differences between the results of those tests. Relating to the topic
discussed, the writer took one topic, namely “at school ”. The form of test
46
examined to the students was multiple choice tests with 20 questions. The
pre-test was conducted on February 1st, 2010 . From the pre -test result, the
mean of the students ’ score was 45. 43. Then, the writer ma de lesson plan
for cycle 1. He planned three meetings for cycle 1 based on the topic. The
meetings were conducted twice a week with a regular schedule
“Wednesday and Saturday ”. Mean while, the pre -test and po st-test were
conducted in the different day s. The writer m ade one lesson plan for one
meeting. As a result, there were t hree lesson plans in cycle 1. E ach
meeting involved different activities which there wer e still relation and
continuantion between one meeting to the others. Th e second meeting was
continuantion of the first meeting and the t hird meeting was the
continuantion of the second meeting.
In the first meeting, the teacher gave orientation and presentation
to the students based on the topic. Here, the teacher provided the objective
of the lesson and the level of performance of the student s. He explained
about what they were going to learn and what kind of activities that they
would done . The teacher also described the content of the lesson and its
relationship to the prior knowledge if there was any. Next , the teacher
discussed the procedures of the lesson that was; the different parts of the
lesson and students responsibilities during those activities. Soo n after the
teacher finished giving the orientation, he continued the lesson by making
the presentati on. The teacher explained the new concept or skill and
provided demonstration and example. He also made sure that students
47
have understood the information before they applied it in the practice
phase by checking them.
In the second meeting, the teacher led students through practice
examples. The students practiced as a group, offering to write answers.
This way was called as structured practice. The teacher demonstrated the
actions based on th e topic, asked students to grasp the meaning of
demonstrated or p racticed actions. In group practice , the teacher pointed a
certain group to perform the action in front of the class and asked other
groups to find out the name of actions. Then the teacher followed up the
lesson by conducting a guide practice. It gave stu dents opportunity to
practice on their own while the teacher was still around them to observe.
He had several roles in this phase such as: monitored students and
provided corrective feedback.
For the third meeting, the teacher planned to conduct independen t
practice. It was used to reinforce the new learning to ensure relation as
well as to develop fluenc y. Here, they practiced by them selves.
c. Implementation or Action
In implementing the action, the teacher used direct instruction
technique as stated in the lesson plan. It mean s that the instructional
process in the classroom used direct Instruction.
1) The first meeting was conducted on Wednesday, 3rd February 2010
(11.15 -12.00)
48
The teacher greeted the students, asked their condition and
checking their attendan ce. The teacher got into the lesson by asking
the students about things at school . There would be several
vocabularies that the y were going to learn. When the teacher asked
about the meaning of things at school , almost all of the students kept
silent. Then , the teacher told to the students what things at school
were and continued with explaining the instructional goal of the
lesson. They wer e going to learn about some object s at school. Next,
the teacher asked the students to mention some object s at school in
Indonesian first. Some students stated the object s such as: buku, pen,
pensil etc . The teacher asked the students to mention those things as
stated previously in English. Only few of them could give some
answers such as : book, pen, pencil, etc.
The teac her decided to write about things at school in the black
board, asked to copy them, read the vocabulary and ask the students to
repeat after him. In the end of the lesson, the teacher explained that in
learning about things at school, there would be demons tration and
example. The teacher d emonstrated the actions related to the topic and
asked the students to pay attention.
2) The second meeting was conducted on Friday, 5th February 2010
(09.15 – 10.00)
The teacher greeted and checked the students’ attendance. The
teacher reviewed the previous lesson by asking some questions. The
49
teacher asked the students to mention some object s or things at school.
The teacher asked the students to take their pencil case and open it.
The teacher stated a certain object and as ked the students to take it.
The teacher gave direct instruction and asked each group to do the
actions wanted. The teacher asked certain group to practice or perform
in front of the class. One of the group members gave the o ral
instruction and other tried to grasp the meaning of the action done and
guess the name of the object demonstrated by his/her.
3) The third meeting was conducted on Wednesday, 10th February 2010
(11.15 -12.00)
The teacher started the lesson by greeting and checking the
students’ attenda nce. The teacher remained again the previous lesson
by giving some questions to the students. He asked what they had
done on the previous meeting. The teachers took some object from his
bag, lift them up one by one and asked the students to identify it. Th e
teacher asked the students to prepare several stuffs on their table. The
teacher stated the instruction and they took the object as asked by him.
The teacher asked to practice individually in how to say the command
orally while doing the action as well. The teacher asked the students to
have the action in front of the class one by one.
d. Observation
The result of the observation can be explained as follows:
50
1. The first meeting
The teacher entered the fourth grade classroom soon after the
bell rang. The situa tion was so noisy and crowded. A few minutes
later, they kept calm the teacher explained to the students about the
topic which was “At School” . When the teacher asked the meaning of
the topic, they just kept silent. Th ere was no response at all. The
teache r told the meaning of school. They were afraid of answer ing the
question which actually they could do it. The situation was not
supporting enough, since it was the last lesson. Moreover, the students
looked very tired and its weather was very hot. The stud ents listened to
the teacher enthusiastically when he told them about the goal of the
lesson. The teacher as ked them to mention some object s at school.
Since there was no volunteer who wanted to try, the teacher pointed
certain student. She stated the obje ct in Indonesian. It was followed by
other students who raised their hands. Their answers were “buku, pen,
pensil” . The teacher asked the students to mention the objects in
English, buy only few of them could state it. When the teacher asked
about “kapur” in English, no one of them could answer it. Next, the
teacher explained tha t in learning about some object s at school, there
would be a new way or concept by doing an action or demonstration
based on the topic discussed. The teacher gave a model about the
action once and the students paid attent ion on him. Considering the
fewer vocabularies mastered by the students, the teacher decided to
51
write down all of the vocabulary on the blackboard. The teacher asked
them to copy on their books. Next, the teacher rea d the objects at
school and asked the students to repeat after him. The students seem
shy and reluctant to do so. The teacher asked to repeat again after him
loudly. In the middle of reading those objects, some students laughed
since they felt that the way of words pronounced were funny. In giving
the example of demonstration, the teachers lift the book. He said,
“book”. He asked the students to do as well after giving the example
together. Then, the teacher included a new word which was “open”.
He said “open”. Next, in the teacher asked the students to repeat the
word. He did it while opening the book. The teacher stood up, took the
book, opened it while saying “open the book!” . He did the action and
oral practice in the same time.
2. The second meeting
The te acher reviewed the previous lesson by asking the
students the meaning of objects at school. It was the second lesson
after the break time. The students still looked fresh and full of spirit.
The class situation was quite calm. When the teacher entered the class,
some of the students still talked each other in a low voice. Related to
the questions about some objects at school asked by the teach er, only
few of them who were clever answered it. The other s just kept silent
and shy. To break the ice, the teacher asked the students to open their
pencil case. He asked to take them out. The teacher asked the students
52
to take, hold it up as stated by the teacher. He said, “Take the ruler” .
When he said so, some of the students took the wrong object. It made
the othe r students laughed since they felt it was funny. Next, the
teacher asked the students to work in group. The teacher divided the
students into six groups. The teacher gave an action related to the topic
learnt and each group guessed it. The teacher acted cl eaning the
blackboard. Then, all groups answered, “clean the blackboard!” . They
looked very active, happy and enthusiastic. Next, the teacher asked
each group to demonstrate the actions in front of the class. One of the
members acted to give the actions wh ile other member tried to guess
the actions.
3. The third meeting
The teacher made a small preview about the topic discussed on
the last meeting. He asked to the students about the material they had
learnt previously including its activity. He said, “Hayoo…ke marin
ingat gak pelajarannya apa trus ngapain aja?” . The students
answered “itu lho pak…tentang benda -benda ada book, eraser, vase
dan lain -lain, trus ada juga nebak gerakan, pak.”. Then, the teacher
took some objects from his bag. He asked the students to mention the
object as he held. There were still few student s who gave
inappropriate response . The teacher asked the students to prepare the
objects as the teacher asked to bring on the table. The teacher gave a
direct instruction and asked the students t o do the action. He said,
53
“Touch the book!” , “ Take your flag!” etc. At this stage, there was a
student who did the wrong action. It seem ed that he confused. It
caused other students to laugh . Next, the teacher asked the students to
practice the action by combining both demonstration and oral practice
in the same time.
e. Reflection
After analyzing the observation result in cycle, the writer reflected
several positive result s and some weaknesses in the first cycle. They were
described as follow:
1) Positive resu lt
a) Using Direct Instruction in explaining the topic of “At school”
attracted student s’ curiosity. They paid attention carefully to the
teachers’ explanation in how to act and guess the action.
b) They enjoyed the lesson. It could be seen from their happiness,
smile and press less when the class started.
Their English score increased significantly compared with the pre –
test. In the post -test, th ere was an improvement. It means that there
was an improvement of students’ vocabulary mastery as well. The
mean score of pre -test was 45. 34 and the mean score of the post –
test was 60. 68. There was an improvement of the students’
vocabulary mastery after cycle 1.
54
c) There was a changing on students’ behavior to the lesson. They
were so active and enthusiastic to be invol ved in the lesson.
2) Weaknesses
a) Some of the students were still busy with themselves. They did not
listen to teachers’ explanation. They preferred to look at their
friends’ action rather than try to practice.
b) Some of the students were still shy, when the t eacher asked to
practice the action both in group and individually. Some of them
were afraid to make a mistake as the teacher instructed to do the
action. It made them be passive one.
c) In taking the object asked by the teacher or grasping the meaning
of the word, the students still made mistakes. They took the
different object from the instruction stated. Dealing with the
pronunciation, they still made error as well.
Based on the fact, the writer thought that it was necessary to
conduct the second cycle.
3) Cycle II
a) Revised Plan
Considering the problems that appeared in cycle 1, the
writer revised the plan in order to minimize or even complete the
weaknesses so that it would not come up again.
55
The plan f or the next cycle – would focus more on the way
to get st udents ’ attention and concentration i ncluding classroom
management to reduce students’ noise, their comprehension with
the instruction, improving students ’ participation on the lesson
which was from passive to be active and improving students ’
vocabular y mastery. Based on those problems, t he writer who was
also as the teacher proposed to conduct the second cycle. The
implementation of direct instruction in this cycle would be held in
three meeting s. The topic discussed was the same with the first
topic but the material was different.
b) Implementation
The implementation of direct instruction technique was
described in a whole of three meeting s. The firs t and the next
meeting still had relation and continuation from one to another.
1) The first meeting was conducte d on Wednesday, 17th February
2010 (11.15 -12.00)
Soon after the bell ra ng, the students sat on their chair
and looked very excited to welcome me. To cheer up the
situation, the teacher asked the students to sing a song
“Mr.Gogo” together. They sang the so ng loudly and happily.
After having finished, the teacher asked the students about
some people at school. He said “ Anak -anak siapakah ibu
Anissa itu?” The students answered “Guru Agama Pak” . The
56
teacher asked the students to mention about other people at
school. When the teacher asked the students about what were
the personne l at school , they answered just the meaning of
school. Then, the teacher explained that they were going to
learn about personnel at school. The teacher stated that there
would be an ac tion to practice the instruction. He gave the
model and the students were asked to imitate the action. The
teacher pointed certain student, gave the instruction and a sked
his/her to give the response . In the end of the lesson, the
teacher asked the student s to write down some personnel at
school in their book . The teacher d rilled the vocabularies and
asked the students to repeat after him.
2) The second meeting was conducted on Friday, 19th February
2010 (09.15 -10.00)
In starting the lesson, the teacher asked the students
about the topic discussed previously. The teacher asked about
some personnel s at school. He stated the position and the
students were asked to state the name of the position. They
answered in loud voice. Then, the teacher divided the students
into several groups. The members of the group were different
from the previous one to have a variation. Each of group was
given some pictures of the school’s personnel in their school.
The teacher stated the position of the school personnel and
57
asked the s tudents to lift the right pictures as the instruction.
Here, the teacher also combined with game by taking each
group to perform the action in front of the class. One of the
students played a role as the instructor who gave the command,
while other members tried to guess the answer . In the end o f
the lesson, the teacher asked them about what they had learnt
and gave the homework.
3) The third meeting was conducted on Tuesday, 23rd February
2010 (07.15 -08.00)
The teacher began the lesson by asking their
homewo rk. While waiting the students prepared their books,
the teacher reviewed the previous lesson by asking some
question s about personnel at sch ool. He pointed certain
student s to give the answer. Most of them could give the
correct answer. Then, the teacher sticked two pictures of school
personnel on the blackboard. The teacher asked certain student
to give the instruction, while doing the action. The other
students were asked by the teacher to pay attention on him/her.
It was done individually until all of t he students performed
their action in front of the class. They were so active in
performing the action although some of them still looked shy.
c) Observation
The result of the observation can be explained as follows:
58
1) First Meeting
After entered the classroom, the teacher asked the
students to sing a song together entitled “Mr. Gogo”. He
thought that by having happy beginning on the lesson, it would
pump up students’ motivation. They sang the song loudly and
happily. Then, the teachers ask ed a question to the s tudents. He
said “ Anak -anak siapakah ibu Anissa itu?” . The students
answered “Guru Agama Pak”. The teacher asked again to the
students “Trus…. Siapakah ibu Asti itu?” . The students
responded “Penjaga Perpustakaan Pak ”. Then, the teacher told
to the studen ts’ that they were going to learn new material.
Hearing that, they were going to have a new material to be
learnt, the students looked very enthusiastic in listening
teacher’s explanation. They could put their main attention on
the lesson although a little bit was still heard from back. The
teacher said that the material was about personnel at s chool.
Then, the teacher asked what personnel at school to the
students were . Since they could only answer the meaning of
school, the teacher explained about it. He also stated that there
would be an action or performance as they did previously. The
teacher asked the students to wri te some of personnel at school
on the blackboard. They were still in Indonesian. He translated
them into English and asked the students to copy in their book.
59
Then, the teacher read the words and asked the stated the
students to repeat after him. He drilled for several times until
they could state in correctly. Next, the teacher called certain
students to go forward in front of the class to practice the
instruction. He pointed the boy and said “Student”. The teacher
did it again and followed by other the students.
2) Second Meeting
After greeted the students and checked the attendance,
the teacher directly reviewed the last lesson to know how fa r
their comprehension was. The teacher said “Ok…..Every body!
Who is your headmaster?” The students answered “Mr.
Sukardi” He asked again “who is your librarian?” They
responded “Mrs. Asti”. They answered happily and loudly.
They still remembered about som e personnel at school. The
teacher asked them to pronounce the words together. Then, the
teacher divided the students into several groups. He gave five
pictures of the personnel at their school for each group. He
asked the students to take the pictures as he instructed and lift
up. They were so active in order to be the fastest one to take
and lift it up. The class atmosphere seemed to be alive.
The teacher explained that they would play a game.
They looked very surprised and enthusiastic to hear that. The
teacher asked each group to name their group. In the game, the
60
teacher would give a direct instruction and the students should
take the right picture while doing the action. The fastest group
which did it correctly and fatly would get a point. They should
say “BINGO” to determine who the fastest one was . The one
who could collect most points would be the winner. The game
was so fan and challenging. Then, the teacher continued the
lesson by asking each group to practice in front of the class.
One of the stud ents would give the instruction and other tried
to guess with what his partner meant by taking and lifting up
the right picture.
3) Third Meeting
As usual the teacher began the lesson by reviewing the
previous lesson. The teacher asked the students about the
personnel at school to them. The students were so active in
mentioning the vocabulary meant. Then, the teacher gave an
instruction by doing an action. The students responded b y
saying “Point the students” . They seemed very excited and
could not wait to guess the answer for the next action done by
the teacher. Next, the teacher took out there picture consisting
of headmas ter, school guard and librarian w hile two other
personnel were teacher and students themselves . The students
were asked to perform in front of the class with the action
including its oral practice. This activity was done individually.
61
d) Reflection
The writer decided to stop the cycle since the result of the
cycle 2 showed good improvement of student’s vocabulary and
student’s behavior. After a nalyzing the cycle, the writer found that
the students still rem embered the vocabulary taught. The y could
give the correct response or answer every time the teacher asked
them to predict the action as well the pronunciation. It meant that
they could grasp and remember the meaning of vocabulary.
In cycle 2, the writer could have a better classroom
management . He could reduce students noisiness and be more
manageable. The s tudents were not busy with them selves. They
could put their concentration more on the l esson. Although th ere
was still a little bit noise from back, generally they listened to the
teachers’ explanation enthusiastically. Some of the students who
were previously shy showed up their action confidently and
actively. They said that it was fun.
Compared with the cycle 1, there were several progressions
in cycle 2. The students actively took a part on the lesson. It
seemed that they did not feel bored anymore with the teaching
learning activity. They could express freely in line with the topic in
doing the action. The classroom atmosphere was also much better.
To support the data, in the end of cycle 2, the writer
conducted the post -test. The mean score of the post -test was 68. 10.
62
There was an improvement of the student’s vocabulary mastery
after c ycle 2.
C. Discussion
This section present s discussion of the research findings during the
research. The research findings were from the observation, test and interview.
1. Observation
The observation was done by the teacher and the observer during the
researc h. The resu lt of the observation was the as field notes. From the field
notes, the writer found some weaknesses and strengths during the
implementation of direct instruction.
Based on the teaching -learning process conducted in the first and
second cycle, several weaknesses could be identified during the
implementation of direct instruction technique. In the first cycle, most of the
students were reluctant to join the lesson. They preferred to become good
listener s. They had little intention to take part in the teaching learning process.
It was getting worse sinc e they were so shy and afraid of making a mistake. In
fact, it was much better in the cycle 2. They beca me active. Unfortunately,
their activeness turned them to be noisy one. S ome of them were busy w ith
them selves when the teacher explained the lesson.
Instead of weaknesses, there were also some strength s that could be
found in the first and second cyc le. In the first cycle, they pai d attention
carefully on the teacher’s explanation in h ow to act and guess the action. It
63
attracted their curiosity. They als o enjoyed the lesson. They looked so happy
and had motivation to be involved in the classroom activities. While in the
second cycle, they had a much better progression in how to guess, grasp and
answe r the meaning of certain words related to the topic by the teacher. They
seemed to be so active, enthusiastic and full of participation every time the
teacher asked them to guess and answer the question. They were also not shy
anymore to demonstrate the ac tion. By combining games and group work, it
trained them in how to work together, help one another and be cooperative.
In implementing direct instruction to teach vocabulary, there were be
several significant points that happened during the teaching learni ng process.
The students looked very confused in comprehending the core of the
technique. When the teacher did the orientation and presentation, th e students
just kept silent. However , when the teacher told them about the action and
how to do it, they show ed an attention and c uriosity. The students ’ response s
were getting better in participating to the lesson when the teacher did
structured practice and guided practice. They were so active in taking part in
the teaching learning process by working in a grou p. They were brave to
demonstrate the action or give the instruction. While in the independent
practice, the students were able to answer the teacher’s question about certain
vocabulary. They were also so confident in performing the instruction with an
action and oral explanation.
64
2. Interview
The writer conducted an interview to the fourth grade class teacher
and students. Th e teacher here also beca me the observer while the writer
implemented the direct instruction technique . The observer said that in the
first cycle some of the students were still busy with them selves. He also stated
that they were still shy when the teacher asked them to do the instruction
while doing the action.
In the second cycle, the observer said that there were several
significant im provements. The students looked very active in the teaching
learning process. There was a change of behavior from passive to be active .
They felt happy with the class atmosphere.
3. Test
The result of students’ voca bulary mastery achievement test showed
that the implementation of direct instruction can improve the student’s
vocabulary mastery. It can be concluded by analyzing the student’s score
before the research and students mean score of each cycle. In the pre -test, the
mean score was 45 . 34. In cycle 1, t he mean score of post-test was 60. 68,
while in cycle 2, the mean score of post test was 68. 10.
From the explanation above, it can be seen that the students ’ mean
score improved in the second cycle. The w riter can conclude that the
implementation o f direct instruction in teaching vocabulary can improve the
students ’ vocabulary mastery o n the fourth grade of SDN Pringanom 3
Masaran Sragen.
65
D. Hypothesis Testing
Based the explanation above, it can be concluded that action hypothesis is
accepted. Teachin g students through direct instruction can improve students’
vocabulary mastery. During the teaching learning process, students showed their
interest to participate on the lesson conducted. They looked to actively involve in
the classroom activities by doin g an instruction with an action. They enjoyed the
lesson very much. There was also an improvement on the stud ents score. It
improved from 60. 68 in the first cycle to 68. 10 in the second cycle.
66 CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION, AND SUGGESTIO N
A. Conclusion
Having conducted the research of teaching English vocabulary at the
elementary school level, it can be shown that the implementation of direct
instruction can improve the students’ vocabulary mas tery. There were several
improve ments reac hed by the students , not only on their academic score, but also
on their behavior to the lesson.
Dealing with the score that the students got , there was a significant
improvement. The use of direct instruction improves the fourth grade of
elementary level students’ achievement in learning English especially in
vocabulary mastery. It can be seen from the comparison between the mean score
of pre – test and post – test in cycle 1 and cycle 2. For pre- test, the mean score of
was 45. 34. The mean score increase d on post – test 1 and to become 60. 68. In
cycle 2, the me an score of post – test 2 was 68. 10. It was higher than the mean
score of post – test 1.
Related to the students’ attitude or behavior to the lesson, there were some
positive progressions that suppor ted them in mastering the vocabula ry taught. The
Direct Instruction technique could create more comfortable atmosphere inside the
class. During the teaching – learning process, the students were more active,
enthusiastic and also interested to take a part in the lesson. They were not shy
67
anymore and they were highly motivated to join the instructional process. It also
increased their confidence. It can be seen from their bravery in demonstrating
some actions or giving some instructions as well in front of the class to reflect
certain vocabulary meaning . As the final result , they could remember the meaning
of words easily.
B. Implication
In the instructional process, it is necessary for the teacher to apply certain
technique in order to obtain students’ s uccessfulness in vocabulary mastery. By
choosing a technique which can increase students’ activeness and involving it into
the teaching learning process, it can lead them in mastering vocabulary easily.
Based on the conclusion on the study, there is a sig nificant improvement
in the students’ vocabulary mastery after they are taught using Direct Instruction .
It is one of the effective techniques in teaching English in elementary school since
it can improve the students’ vocabulary mastery.
C. Suggestion
In the end of this chapter, the writer would like to give suggestions related
to this research which will hopefully be useful for other English teachers in
elementary school and other researchers. The suggestions are as follows:
1. To other English teachers in Elementary school
The teachers in elementary school should be able to find the most suitable
technique or method to be applied in the teaching learning process. It becomes the
68
important point as the key of success for the students in learning. The teac her
should make a supporting classroom atmosphere as interesting as possible. It
means that they can enjoy and relax in learning English without feel ing reluctant
to be involved in to the lesson conducted. In applying direct instruction technique
itself in English teaching, English teacher should consider some aspects such as:
the material, the clearness of the instru ctions, students’ understanding with the
commands, and the time allotment. The teacher should also thin k about the lesson
sequence consisiting of orientation, presentation, guided practice, structure
practice, and independent practice in order to make the instructional process run
well.
2. To other researchers
In teaching English for children, this research can be used as the source in
gainin g more information in how to teach them with direct instruction. It can also
be used as the technique to improve students’ vocabulary by a pplying it in a
different topic. In this research, it can be found the way of presenting certain
topics by using the d irect instruction to improve students’ vocabulary mastery. It
involves some steps which are done orderly with fun activity for each meeting to
attrack students’ participation to the lesson.
69
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allen, Virginia. F. 1983. Technique in Teach ing Vocabulary . Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Arends, I. Richard. 1997. Classroom Interaction and Management . United States
of America. Mc. Graw – Hill Companies, Inc.
Burns, Anne. 1999. Collaborative Action Research for English Language
Teachers. Austr alia: Cambridge University Press. Australia
Burn, Paul C and Betty L. Broman. 1975. The language Arts in Childhood
Education. A Rational for Pedagog y. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press,
Coady and Huckin. 1997. Second Language Acquisition. A R ational fo r
Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Depdikbud Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 1995. GBPP Muatan Lokal Sekolah Dasar
Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris . Semarang: Departemen Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaaan Provinsi Jawa Tengah .
Harmer, Jeremy. 1998. How to teach English . England. Pearson Education
limited.
Hatch, Evelyn and Cheryl Brown. 1995. Vocabulary, Semantics, and Language
Education . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hornby, A.S. 1984. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English .
London: Oxf ord University Press.
Kemmis, Stephen and Mc. Taggart Robbin. 1990. The Action Research Planner .
Australia: Deakin University.
Lado, Robert. 1964. Language Teaching: A Scientific Approach . New York:
McGraw – Hill.
Lewis, Michael and Hill, Jamie. 1997. Pract ical Techniques for Language
Teaching . London: Commercial Colour Press, Plc.
Madsen, Harold S. 1983. Technique in Testing . New York: Oxford University
Press. USA
70
McCharty, Michael. 1990. Vocabulary . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mills, Geoffrey E. 2000 . Action Research: Principles and Practice . Ohio: Prentice
Hall.
Nunnan, David. 1992. Research Methods in Language Learning . UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Procter, Paul. 1978. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English . New York:
Longman Group, Ltd.
Rich ards, JC and Rodgers, TS. 1998. Approaches and Methods and Language
Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, Norbert & Mc Charty, Michael. 1997 . Vocabulary: Description
Acquisition and Pedagog y. Cambridge University Press.
Scott, Wendy A and Lisbeth H. Yteberg. 1998. Teaching English to Children .
Harlow. Longman .
Swannel, Julia. 1992. The Oxford Modern English Dictionary . Oxford:
Clarendom Press.
Wilkins, D. A. 1972 . Linguistic in Language Teaching . London: The English
Language Book Society. UK.
Wolf, M. James. 2000. Models of Teaching. Sixth Edition . A Pearson Education.
Company.
Copyright Notice
© Licențiada.org respectă drepturile de proprietate intelectuală și așteaptă ca toți utilizatorii să facă același lucru. Dacă consideri că un conținut de pe site încalcă drepturile tale de autor, te rugăm să trimiți o notificare DMCA.
Acest articol: IMPROVING THE STUDENTS VOCABULARY MASTERY [600383] (ID: 600383)
Dacă considerați că acest conținut vă încalcă drepturile de autor, vă rugăm să depuneți o cerere pe pagina noastră Copyright Takedown.