COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING Viorica BANCIU University of Oradea Tel: 00 -40-259-408439 E-mail: myconferences18@gmail.com Angela JIREGHIE “Vasile… [616901]

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

Viorica BANCIU
University of Oradea
Tel: 00 -40-259-408439 E-mail: [anonimizat]
Angela JIREGHIE
“Vasile Goldiș” Western University of Arad
Tel: 0040 -257-282324 E-mail: ajireghie@ yahoo.com

Abstract
This paper focus es on the idea of an effective communicati on between teacher
and students aiming to prove that classroom activities maximize opportunities
for learners to use target language in a communicative way for meaningful
activities. The emphasis lies on meani ng (messages they are creating or task s
they are completing) rather than form (correctness of lan guage and language
structure).

Keywords : communication, teaching, language, method s, activities

INTRODUCTION
Communicative Language Teachin g is usually characterized as a
broad approach to teaching, rather than as a teaching method with a clearly
defined set of classroom practices.
Historically, Communicative Language Teaching has been seen as a
response to the Audio -Lingual Method and as an extension or development of
the Notional -Functional Syllabus. As an extension of the notional -functional
syllabus, Communicative Language Teaching places great emphasis on
helping students use the target language in a variety of contexts and on
learning language functions.
Unlike the Audio -Lingual Method, its primary focus is on helping
learners create meaning rather than helping them develop perfectly
grammatical structures or acquire native -like pronunciation. This means that
successfully learning a forei gn language is assessed in terms of how well
learners have developed their communicative competence, which can
loosely be defined as their ability to apply knowledge of a language with
adequate proficiency to communicate. „Der kommunikative Ansatz
verarbei tet Anregungen der Sprechakttheorie und der kommnuikativen
Kompetenz. Die Sprache wird pragmatisch gesehen, die Muster der
unterschiedlichen Sprechabsichten stehen im Vordergrund.” (Biri s, Tirban,
Milancovici, 2010, 46)
Communicative Language Teaching is m ost often defined as a list of
general principles or features. One of the most recognized of these lists is
David Nunan's (1991) five features of Communicative Language Teaching:

The Public Administration and Social Policies Review IV Year, No. 1(8) / June 2012
95
 an emphasis on learning to communicate through interaction in the
target lang uage,
 the introduction of authentic texts into the learning situation,
 the provision of opportunities for learners to focus, not only on
language but also on the learning management process,
 an enhancement of the learner's own personal experiences as
impor tant contributing elements to classroom learning
 an attempt to link classroom language learning with language
activities outside the classroom.
These five features are claimed by practitioners of Communicative
Language Teaching to show that they are very i nterested in the needs and
desires of their learners, as well as the connection between the language
as it is taught in their class and as it used outside the classroom. Under
this broad definition, any teaching practice that helps students develop their
communicative competence in an authentic context is considered an
acceptable and beneficial form of instruction.
The concept of communication i s the process by which people assign and
convey meaning in an attempt to create shared understanding. It is throug h
communication that collaboration and cooperation occur. Communication is the
articulation of sending a message, through different media whether it be
verbal or nonverbal, so long as a being transmits a thought, provoking idea,
gesture or action. I consid ered several types of communication: verbal (by
means of language, dialogue) and non -verbal communication.

WHAT CAN COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING IMPLY?
It makes use of real -life situations that generate communication.
The teacher sets up a situation that students are likely to encounter in real life.
Unlike the audio -lingual method of language teaching, which relies on
repetition and drills, the communicative approach can leave students in
suspense as to the outcome of a class exercise, which will vary according to
their reactions and responses. The real -life simulations change from day to day.
Students' motivation to learn comes from their desire to communicate in
meaningful ways about meaningful topics. Several concepts related to
communicative langua ge teaching are presented here.
The ultimate role that teaching must assume is to generate
comm unication. A language communicates meaning. Grammar instances
should be presented and practiced in order to achieve this goal. This is why I
described the place of grammar in language teaching with its four stages:
presentation, isolation and explanation, practice and test.
We consider that knowledge of grammatical rules is essential to the
mastery of a language. The teacher has to prepare an organized, balanced p lan
of classroom teaching/learning procedures through which the learners will be
enabled to spend some of their time concentrating on mastering one or more

Viorica Banciu, Angela Jireghie – Communicative Language Teaching
96
of the components of the target language on their way to acquiring it as a
whole.
The practical hint s and communicative activities designed to stimulate
conversation and communication among students in the English class, the
activities and exercises should be ranged starting from the ones applied
to early students (in my case, third year students) and mo ved on to
more complex communicative activities, applicable to older learners.
„Der Lehrer beklagt sich häufig, dass die Schüler `faul` seien. Die
Motivationsforschung versucht derartige Er klärungszirkel zu
durchbrechen. “ (Biriș, 2010, 475) Activities to present and reinforce
language should be fun but challenging and should follow a deliberate
progression.
In a communicative classroom for beginners, the teacher
might begin by passing out cards, each with a different name printed on
it. The teacher then pr oceeds to model an exchange of introductions in the
target language:
e.g Teacher: Good morning. What's your name?
Reply: Hello! My name is Mary.

Using a combination of the target language and gestures, the
teacher conveys the task at hand, and gets the students to introduce
themselves and ask their classmates for information. They are
responding in English to a question in English. They do not know
the answers beforehand, as they are each holding cards with their new
identities written on them; hence, there is an authentic exchange of
information.
Later during the class, as a reinforcement listening exercise, the
students might hear a recorded exchange between two English kids
meeting each other for the first time at the gym doors. Then the teac her
might explain, in Romanian, the differences among English greetings in
various social situations. Finally, the teacher might explain some of
the grammar points and structures used.
The stages for an effective communicative activity and
several games wh ich offer the students opportunities to use the
language they are learning in non -threatening, enjoyable contexts
should be taken into account.
The teacher should have feedback for each activity that students
are involved in. This is why I presented some w ays of testing the
students ' competences (both formal and informal ways of evaluation
were considered). By testing the students (orally or in writing), teacher
will find out if, how much, and how well the learner has a cquired the
new material. It is also important to depict the mistakes and

The Public Administration and Social Policies Review IV Year, No. 1(8) / June 2012
97
deficiencies of their work. Testing includes grading but it is not
restricted to it. As alternative means of evaluation I mentioned
systematic observation, the project, the self – evaluation method and the
portfolio.
During communicative activities a classroom is far from quiet. The
students do most of the speaking, and frequently the scene of a classroom
during a communicative exercise is active, with students leaving their seats to
complete a task.
Because of the incre ased responsibility to participate, students may
find they gain confidence in using the target language in general. Students
are more responsible managers of their own learning. In communicative
classrooms teachers will find themselves talking less and listening more,
becoming active facilitators of their students' learning. The teacher sets up the
exercise, but because the students' performance is the goal, the teacher
must step back and observe, sometimes acting as a monitor.
All obstacles can be overcome if the role of the teacher is clearly set.
When setting up an activity of any kind within a language class, establishing
the role of the teacher is essential in creating a positive atmosphere for the
success of the activity.
The communicative approach put s great emphasis on listening, which
implies an active will to try to understand the others.
Thus, communicative language teaching often takes the form of
pair and group work requiring negotiation and cooperation between learners,
fluency -based activitie s that encourage learners to develop their confidence,
role-plays in which students practice and develop language functions, as well
as judicious use of grammar and pronunciation focused activities. Some of the
most frequently classroom activities used in communicative language teaching
are:
> e.g. Activities,
> Role-play,
> Interviews,
> Information Gap,
> Games,
> Language Exchanges,
> Surveys,
> Pair Work
The communicative approach emphasizes the idea of an
effective communication between the teacher and the students an d
focuses on language as a medium of communication. It recogniz es that
all communication has a social purpose – learners have something to say
or find out. Classroom activi ties maximiz e opportunities for learners
to use target language in a communicative w ay for meaningful
activities. The emphasis lies on meaning (messages they are creating or

Viorica Banciu, Angela Jireghie – Communicative Language Teaching
98
task they are completing) rather than form (correctness of language and
language structure) – as in first language acquisition.
CONCLUSION
Communicative approach is n ot just limited to oral skills.
Reading and writing skills need to be developed to promote pupils'
confidence in all four skill areas. By using elements encountered in
a variety of ways (reading, summarizing , translating, discussion,
debates) language is m ade more fluid and pupils' manipulation of
language more fluent. It is important not to be restricted to one
textbook; text-book must not be used from cover to cover. It can be
considered only a tool, a starting -point. With a little inspiration and
imagina tion, text -books can be manipulated and rendered more
communicative. Teacher must free him/herself from it, rely more on
his/her own command of language and his/her professional expertise as
to what linguistic items, idioms, phrases, words, need to be dril led,
exploited or extended. Spontaneous and improvised practice helps to
make minds more flexible and inspire confidence in coping with
unforeseen, unanticipated situations. There is a need to use different
registers and develop alternative ways of saying things.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. BIRIȘ , R. T. , Wichtige Lernfaktoren im DaF – Unterricht , in
International Symposium „Research, Education and Development“ ,
Ed. Risooprint, Cluj -Napca, 2010.
2. BIRIȘ , R.T., Țirban, N., Milancovici, S., Pomffyova, M., Methoden
des Unterrichts in der deutschen, englischen und französischen
Sprache , in Studii de Știință și Cultură , Vol. VI, No . 2 (June) 2010,
41-46.
3. BAUMEISTER , R. F., & LEARY, M. R., The need to belong:
Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human
motivation , in Psychological Bu lletin , 1995 .
4. DELAHUNTY, P. G., & Garvey, J. J., Language ,
Grammar, Communication, McGraw – Hill, New York, 1994 .
5. HARMER, J., The Practice o f English Language Teaching ,
Longman , London and New York, 1999 .
6. UR, P., A Course in Language T eaching, Cambridge
University Press , Cambridge, UK, 1996 .
7. VIZENTAL, A., Metodica predarii limbii engleze,
Polirom , Iași, 2007 .