Clarinet 2002 (ferber Grimski) Brownfields And Redevelopment Of Urban Areas Highlighted [623360]

CLARINET
nmentCLARINETCLA R
i
NETontaminatednd ehablitation
etworkfornviroal
echnologies
Brownfields and
Redevelopment of Urban Areas
A report from the Contaminated Land
Rehabilitation Network for Environmental
Technologies
Version: August 2002

Brownfields and Redevelopment of Urban
Areas
Report prepared by Working Group "Brow nfield Redevelopment" of the Concerted
Action "Contaminated Land Rehabilitatio n Network for Environmental Technolo-
gies" (CLARINET), funded by the European Commission, DG Research, under theEnvironment and Climate Programme and co-o rdinated by the Austrian Federal En-
vironment Agency.
Further CLARINET publications in this series
• Sustainable Management of Co ntaminated Land: An Overview
• Contaminated Land and its Impact on Wat er Resources
• Remediation of Contaminated Land. Technology Implementation in Europe –
State-of-the-Art
• Review of Decision Support Tools and their use in Europe
• An Analysis of National and EU RTD Programmes related to sustainable Land
and Groundwater Management
• Clarinet Final Confer ence, Proceedings; 21/22 June 2001, Vienna, Austria
CLARINET satellite publications
• Proceedings of the CLARINET Workshop on Ecological Risk Assessment, April
17-19, 2001 Nunspeet, The Netherlands. S-TEC 2001
• Environment Agency for England and Wales, June 2001: Epidemiology Workshop
on Human Health Tools and Techniques – Report; Environment Agency, RioHouse, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almond sbury, Bristol BS32 4DU
• Land Contamination & Reclamation, Vol. Nine – Number One, 2001; published by
EPP Publications, 52 Kings Road , Richmond, Surrey TW10 6EP, UK
• Frank Swartjes, 2002: Variatio n in calculated human exposure: Comparison of
calculations with seven European human exposure mo dels (in press) – RIVM
report 711701030; Amsterdam 2002

Authors
Uwe FERBER (Projektgruppe Stadt und Entwicklung, Germany)
Detlef GRIMSKI (Federal En vironment Agency, Germany)
Editors
Detlef GRIMSKI (Federal En vironment Agency, Germany)
Judith LOWE (Consultan t, United Kingdom)
Steve SMITH (Welsh De velopment Agency, UK)
Uwe FERBER (Projektgruppe Stadt und Entwicklung, Germany)
Working Group Members
Co-ordinator: Detlef GR IMSKI (Federal Environm ental Agency, Germany)
Jane BROGAN (EPA, Ireland), Cees BU IJS (hbg, NICOLE), Lopez DE VELASCO
(Environment Ministry, Spain), Pierre DENGIS (ISSeP, Belgium), Irene EDELGAARD
(EPA, Denmark), Uwe FERBER (Projektgruppe Stadt und Entwicklung, Germany),Celeste JORGE (LNEC, Portugal), Fotini BOURA (Environment Ministry, Greece),
Barbara LOPEZ DIAS (Instituto dos Residu os, Portugal), Judith LOWE (Independent
Consultant, UK), Nora MEIXNER (Envir onment Ministry, Au stria), Ted NEALON
(EPA, Ireland), Emmanuel NORMANT (Env ironment Ministry, France) , Francesca
QUERCIA (ANPA, Italy), Martin SCHAMA NN (Umweltbundesamt, Austria), Steve
SMITH (Welsh Development Agency, UK), Harald SOLBER G (SFT, Norway), Jouko
TUOMAINEN (FEI, Finland), Eddy VAN DY CK (OVAM, Belgium), Onno VAN
SANDICK, (Minvrom, Netherlands)
Invited Members: Dale MEDEARIS (US EP A), Adrien PILON (National Research
Council, Canada)
Acknowledgement
Federal Environment Agency /Berlin, Ge rmany for project support and report
preparation
All CLARINET country co-ordinators
Imprint
Published by: Umweltbundesamt GmbH (Federal Environment Agency Ltd)
Spittelauer Lände 5, A-1090 Wien, Austria
This publication may be produced free of charge in any format or medium provided
it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must
be acknowledged as taken from FERBER & GRIMSKI: "Brownfields and redevelop-
ment of urban areas", Austrian Federa l Environment Agency, 2002 on behalf of
CLARINET

FOREWORD
This report is the result of working gr oup "Brownfield Redevelo pment" of the net-
work CLARINET (Contaminated Land Re habilitation Network for Environmental
Technologies), a project funded under th e Environment and Climate Programme of
the European Commission.
CLARINET provides an interdisciplinary netw ork on the sustainable management of
contaminated land in Europe, analysed ke y-issues in decision-making processes and
identified priority research needs on tec hnical, environmental and socio-economic
topics. The network brings together the combined knowledge and expertise of aca-demics, national policy makers, government experts, consultants, industrial landowners and technology developers from 16 European countries. Key objective of
CLARINET was to identify the means for the effective and sustainable management
of contaminated land in order to
ensure the safe (re-)use of these lands
abate caused water pollution
maintain the functionality of soil and (ground-)water ecosystems.
CLARINET focused on the basis of current ly applied risk-based procedures for land
management in European countries, aiming to evaluate the current state of the art
and to stimulate scientific collaboration on identified research needs in Europe.
To yield an integrated approach within the project, several interlinked working
groups were identifying prob lem and solution related as pects for contaminated land
management. The following th emes have been addressed:
Brownfields Redevelopment
Impacts of Contaminated Land on Water Resources
Remediation Technologies and TechniquesHuman Health Aspects
Risk Management and Decision Support
Furthermore, one working group aimed to stimulate collaboration between various
R&D Programmes on a European level.
Based on the identified state- of-the-art in these areas, integrative concepts and rec-
ommendations for tackling cont aminated land problems have be investigated, taking
the different approaches in the European countries into account. Needs for further
research have been identified.
The individual working group results contri buted in developing an overall concep-
tual framework for sustainable management of contaminated land (Risk Based LandManagement). This concept is also available within this series of publications.
Martin Schamann
Federal Environment Agency, Austria
On behalf of the CLARINET Steering Committee and members of the network.

CONTENTS
1 SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………1
2 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………………3
3 GENERAL APPROACH………………………………………………………………………………..7
4 BROWNFIELDS IN EUROPE ……………………………………………………………………….9
4.1 Types and definitions ……………………………………………………………………………………9
4.2 Extent of the problem…………………………………………………………………………………..10
5 INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIV ES OF BROWNFIELDS ………………………..13
5.1 European Commission…………………………………………………………………………………13
5.2 US-Environmental prot ection agency (EPA) ……………………………………………….14
5.3 OECD’s Territorial Development Service …………………………………………………..15
6 NATIONAL BACKGROUNDS…………………………………………………………………..17
6.1 Policy – an overview …………………………………………………………………………………….17
6.2 Specific national and regional programmes………………………………………………..20
6.3 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 27
7 BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE / PROJECT
PROCEDURES …………………………………………………………………………………………….29
7.1 Future use/Planning procedures ………………………………………………………………….29
7.2 Site preparation / technical procedures ……………………………………………………….35
7.3 Economic viability ……………………………………………………………………………………….38
7.4 Legal Frameworks………………………………………………………………………………………..39
8 DEFICITS AND RESEARCH NEEDS …………………………………………………………43
8.1 Policy and programmes ……………………………………………………………………………….43
8.2 Future use and planning procedures …………………………………………………………..478.3 Site preparation and technical procedures ………………………………………………….48
8.4 Economic viability ……………………………………………………………………………………….51
8.5 Other relevant topics for future action ………………………………………………………..53
9 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………………………………55
ANNEX 1: COUNTRY INFORMATION………………………………………………………………..59
ANNEX 2: CHECKLIST ON LAND RECYCLING……………………………………………….117

1 SUMMARY
Across Europe, the presence of derelict land is a subject of concern in many coun-
tries. Brownfield sites present particular challenges to national and regional policy
makers in terms of bringing the land back into beneficial use and in terms of cleaning
up contaminated land and groundwater. While contaminated land management is
aiming at the management or elimination of risks, the primary objective of brown-field redevelopment is the reuse of the land and the reintegration of the properties
into the economic cycle. In this respect successful brownfield redevelopment policies
and strategies particularly need the combination of environmental approaches withspatial and urban planning approaches to be integrated into policy approaches and
vice versa. To provide such a link betw een disciplines and issues, the Working
Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ with in the wider CLARINET project examined
this in depth.
Brownfield sites present complex problems, including the contamination of the land.
However, there are many much wider aspect s that need to be considered and inte-
grated into action to achi eve effective solutions. The political, social and economic
context of brownfields becomes clearer through analysis of related aspects in theseareas, such as:
• Breakdown of economics,
• Problems in attracting new investors,
• High unemployment rate,
• Adverse effects on urban life,
• Decline of tax income for the communities,
• Social conflicts,
• Consumption of greenfields.
Dealing with brownfields in this broader sense also means dealing with the different
interests of a variety of stakeholders, including regulators, investors, land owners,developers, consultants, academics, community groups, technology providers and
the financial sector. The Working Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ therefore
agreed that the integration of disciplines by means of working in partnerships to-
wards the overall objective of land reclamation is essential.
The review of national approaches for th e redevelopment of brownfields in Europe
made quite clear that the problem has been recognised in particularly industrialised
countries and actions have been taken. However, such action may not always bebased on a national strategy but rather rela tes to single or regional efforts to cope
with the issue. It appears that the legal frameworks in many countries have not yet
sufficiently integrated the needs arising from the viewpoint of environmental pro-tection / restoration with the viewpoin t of spatial and urban planning. In many
countries there is still no specific emphasis on the reuse of brownfields in the urban
and spatial planning regimes. Many planning systems are geared towards the devel-

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria2
opment of undeveloped land (greenfie ld) instead of form erly developed land
(brownfield). Hence, the overall conditions for investments on greenfields are mostly
more beneficial than on brownfields.
Additionally, integratio n and co-operation is needed at the administrative level
which is responsible for the enforcement of policies. If there is no implementation of
the interdisciplinary principle in administ ration and if planning divisions, environ-
mental divisions and econom ic promotion divisions do not establish administrative
interfaces, the long timescales for brownf ield redevelopment ma y not significantly
improve. National governments and other central organisations can support this task
by means of national training programme s, national funding and by providing as-
sistance for the establishment of appropriate conditions at the regional level.
The Working Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ have made a number of recom-
mendations and identified re search tasks for the future. These relate to policy rec-
ommendations and specific suggestions for research that would be desirable on aninternational level in Europe. Recognition th at there is a lack of existing tools and
guidance has been essential fo r the identification of such needs. Their availability
would greatly assist in promoting and developing solutions to deal with the chal-
lenges of brownfield redevelopment. The key recommendations ar e structured along
the topics of policy and programmes, fut ure use and planning procedures, site
preparation and technical procedures and economic viability. They encompass the
main factors which are required for dete rmining the success of specific brownfield
projects.
With the checklist on land recycling which is annexed to this report, the Working
Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ provide s a tool that can support the manage-
ment of complex brownfield projects. It has been anal ysed for validity related to
common European procedures for approval and other legal matters, land planning
and environmental protection . Municipalities and project managers may use this list
for further adaptation according to their specific needs and conditions.
Finally, the work and the progress of work in this Working Group made very clear
that exchanging information on existing experiences is vital for the development of
new solutions. Co-operation and information exchange along different national and
sub-national legislative and policy frameworks for urban, economic and environ-
mental sustainability is an important element to deal with the complex challenges ofbrownfields. This will present further o pportunities to turn brownfields from a
problem to a future resource and to change a potential threat into an asset.

2 INTRODUCTION
In any discussion of sustainable management of contaminated sites it is clear that the
particular issue of “brownfield” sites, or "brownfields", needs to be considered.
Brownfield sites are not necessarily contam inated – the term “brownfield” was ini-
tially introduced in a general sense to de scribe sites which had been previously in
use, to contrast them with “greenfield” la nd which had not previously been used for
development. The term is usually relate d to the need to consider whether the land
can be reused. However, as much of the former use can be industrial use, this consid-
eration of reuse does lead to the need to address pr oblems of contamination.
The redevelopment of brownfield sites, therefore, presents a particular set of circum-
stances in terms of dealing with contamination. The key issues relating to land con-
tamination are that;
• contamination may be a technical barrier to reuse;
• concerns about the risk (real or perceive d) from contaminatio n inhibit investment
in the land;
• the cost of dealing with contamination adds to other economic burdens on regen-
eration of land affected by former industrial use;
• the interface of the policy and legal framework for dealing with land contamina-
tion with the policy and legal framework for land regeneration can be complex;
• there are much wider issues relating to the regeneration of land which has previ-
ously been used for industrial or othe r purposes – these ca n present additional
complexities in terms of dealin g with the contamination issue.
However the successful reuse of brownfield sites, which addresses environmental,
economic and social needs in a sustainable way, can provide a positive way of deal-
ing with the legacy of land contamination.
THE WIDER ISSUES FOR LAND MANAGEMENT
As the main reason for the emergence of brownfields is economic structural change
and the decline of traditiona l industries, brownfield land is coupled with a severe
loss of jobs and, as a direct consequence, the decline of the neighbourhoods around
such sites or even of whole cities. In this context, it is commonly recognised anddocumented (e.g. by OECD 1998) that the presence of brow nfields has adverse effects
not only on the environment, but also on the economic and social health of a region.
There is increasing ev idence at the international level of policies focussed on the need
to reuse brownfield sites for future urban development. However current practice inmany industrialised countr ies still involves a signific ant level of development on
greenfield sites. In Germany, alone, an estimated 129 hectares per day of greenfield
land is lost for building purposes. Urban sp rawl and the spatial separation of differ-
ent land uses are ongoing and lead to an increasing need for mobility of the public. In
addition there is ongoing co nsumption of greenfield site s for housing, retailing and
industry. Mechanisms for re-integrating brownfields into the property markets may

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria4
help to shift development back to central ur ban locations, which are generally con-
sidered to provide a more su stainable built environment.
Brownfield redevelopment is a complex process faced by the number of different
actors and interest groups involved in the decision making process. Brownfield rede-
velopment is a common component of envi ronmental restoration, land use planning
and economic policy. The pres ence of urban brownfields in particular is a challeng-
ing issue for national, regional and local stakeholders in terms of;
• revitalisation of former industrial sites in the urban and regional context;
• remediation of the environment;
• reintegration of rehabilitated sites into the economic cycle.
Brownfield redevelopment in the context of sustainability and Risk Based Land
Management
In the context of scientific discussions it is necessary to define the link between con-
taminated land management and brownf ield redevelopment. Although contami-
nated land is a common problem on many brownfield sites, cont aminated land man-
agement does not represent the full scope of objectives and components of brown-
field redevelopment. Political and scientifi c discussions on contaminated land man-
agement in the past have often focused primarily on environmental problems. The
management and the elimination of environmental risks according to the use of thesite is the core objective of contaminated land management. This risk management is
possible, although not necessarily desirable, without revitalisation of the site in an
urban and regional context or reintegration of the site into the economic cycle in asustainable way. From an overall policy pe rspective there are co nsequently several
aspects in relation to brownfields that n eed to be considered and combined by means
of political, scientific and technical solutions.
Polluted sites that endanger human health or ecological health, or damage natural
resources, are an environmental problem. On the other hand, derelict land, whether
or not it causes any immediate risk may be considered as a sp atial planning problem,
with specific economic and social implicat ions. From an overa ll viewpoint the exam-
ple of brownfield redevelopmen t represents a subject of real sustainable dimensions.
It tackles environmental, social and econ omic issues, which are the main aspects of
sustainability. As a result the major tren d in policy development is to address envi-
ronmental issues and spatial planning issu es simultaneously. E fforts to develop such
integrated approaches have also resulted in a shift in attention of policy makers from
the assessment of problems to the formulatio n of solutions that will meet the needs
of society in a sustainable way. The CLARINET approach to combine both issues isproposed as Risk Based Land Management (RBLM).
RBLM acknowledges the need for decision support tools, which may vary from
straightforward inform ation about the advantages and disadvantages of various op-
tions to formalised weighting systems. RBLM is a tool to manage both the risks ofthe site and the needs for sp atial planning. RBLM seeks to:

Introduction
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria5
• combine the requirements for risk reduction and land use;
• combine the needs from the perspective of the site as well as from the perspective
of the environment;
• address the full context and process of land management in a sustainable way.
CLARINET WORKING GROUP „B ROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT“
The growing awareness of Brownfield issues across European countries provided the
impetus for the establishment of a specific Working Group on brownfield sites –
Working Group „Brownfield Redevelopmen t“ – within the wider CLARINET proj-
ect. The provision of a link between, on the one hand, contaminated land issues and,on the other, spatial and urban development issues, was one of the core objectives of
CLARINET. The focus of the work conducted has been on the evaluation of best
practice approaches in brownfield redeve lopment across Europe, and the identifica-
tion of research and development needs. At the same time, the Working Group„Brownfield Redevelopment“ has also atte mpted to identify tools that are already
available, that may help to overcome current obstacles to the effective and efficient
redevelopment of brownfield sites.
This report documents th e results of the work of CLARINET Working Group
„Brownfield Redevelopment“. It was compiled from the output of wo rking group
discussions, the feedback from several qu estionnaires plus additional evaluation of
literature, case studie s and expert interviews.
Annexed to this report are Country specific information (Annex 1) and a Check List on
Land Recycling (Annex 2). The country specific reports are structured along the issues
of:
• Country profiles
/c134 extent localisation / types of brownfield;
/c134 policy / programmes / actors;
/c134 legal regulations;
/c134 gaps and obstacles,
• Inventories of selected brownfield projects, and
• Contacts an d Literature.
This information has been compiled during the work of CLARINET Working Group
„Brownfield Redevelopment“ and for each country reflects the key topics in a na-
tional context.
The Checklist on Land Recycling is a tool to support the management of complex brown-
field projects. It encompasses 50 questions that address the elements of key fields of action
in the area of land recycling. The questions have been derived from an original set of 68
questions which have been developed as part of a German R&D project (based on thefindings obtained in project evaluations). The Working Group „Brownfield Redevelop-ment“ modified and adopted the questions to be compatible to the legal and planning
systems in participating countries across the European Union. They are designed to cover

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria6
all central issues of a typical project and to reflect the common procedural patterns for
land recycling projects, in combination with recommendations given on how to optimise
the process.

3 GENERAL APPROACH
The general approach of CLARINET Work ing Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“
was to investigate national backgrounds in the context of brownfield redevelopment
across Europe, examining policies, programme s and projects within these countries.
The principal approach for the analysis was based on the assumption that the success
of complex brownfield rede velopment projects depends highly upon a number of
interconnecting factors. Considering the complexity as a whole, no factor in this rela-
tional network dominates the other – they have a co-ordinated effect.
As a basic background for more detailed investigation, the fo llowing influencing
factors for brownfield redevelopment pr ojects are regard ed as essential:
• Future use
• Site preparation
• Economic viability
• Legal framework
A tetrahedron, which repr esents the connection and interdependency of four
equivalent factors can be used to illustrate the relationship of these key factors for
brownfield redevelopment (Illustration 1). It further illustrates that the factors must
co-operate to achieve a balance. The ‘Tet rahedron Model’ was therefore adopted by
CLARINET Working Group „B rownfield Redevelopment“ ∗ as an illustrative tool to
describe the dynamics of the complex processes and projects that are integral to
brownfield redevelopment.

Illustration 1: The tetrahedron model

∗ It had been originally developed by the Federa l Environmental Agency of Germany and provides
the basis for the check-list tool. (UMWELTBUNDESAMT, 2000)Legal
Famework
Future Use
EconomySite Preparation

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria8
The future use aspects can also consider some of the social dimensions, and the site
preparation includes the need to ensure that the site is not causing harm or pollution
of the environment.

4 BROWNFIELDS IN EUROPE
4.1 Types and definitions
Brownfields are a multi-faceted phenomenon, and any type-related classification
cannot be more than a tool for analysis. Some countries have adopted terminology todescribe the scope of brownfield redevelopmen t. As outlined in the annexed country
specific information and in chapter 6.2, there are approaches for definitions in France,
the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. They mainly describe the scope of brown-
fields according to specific national pe rspectives using the terms “dereliction”,
“modified use”, “rehabilitation ”, “re-use”, “regeneration” and “revitalisation”. There
are no common terms across the European Un ion that precisely define what brown-
field sites are. This makes direct comparison of the problem and of policy initiatives
difficult.
Systematic considerations about appropriat e criteria to classify brownfields have
been particularly made in the UK (ALKER , 2000). Such criteria that can be applied to
whole sites or parts of sites are mainly based on the characteristics that describe thecurrent status of the site, like vacancy, de reliction, contaminatio n, partial occupation
or partial utilisation. Further criteria that are suitable to assist the classification of
brownfield sites are the previous use, the ownership situation and the size of the site.
Information on previous use is important to estimate the type and extent of potential
contamination of the site. It allows an estimation of the costs for site preparation de-pending on different reuse options and related construction design needs. For exam-
ple the large derelict coal and steel sites in Europe require meas ures that are quite
different from those required for small-scale derelict textile sites in inner-city mixed
areas.
As far as site ownership is concerned, th e scope ranges from big private and public
industrial corporations, for example in coal, iron steel, and power generation indus-
tries, government bodies and publicly owne d companies, to small private enterprises
in secondary industries. These various owne rship situations lead to different condi-
tions for acquisition, funding and further use options, e.g. revitalisation funding
commitments for public or private owners.
For the purposes of this work, CLARI NET Working Group „Brownfield Redevelop-
ment“ has agreed on the following definition, which is intended to describe the full
context of the environmental, economic and land use issues that are involved:
Brownfields are sites that:
• have been affected by the former us es of the site and surrounding land
• are derelict or underused
• have real or perceived contamination problems
• are mainly in developed urban areas
require intervention to bring them back to beneficial use

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria10
4.2 Extent of the problem
In most European countries the existence of brownfields has been recognised as a
problem. However, the term brownfield has been used in different contexts to meanslightly different things. The survey un dertaken by the CL ARINET Working Group
„Brownfield Redevelopment“ within the part icipating countries resulted in a variety
of information about both brownfields and contaminated sites (see table 1 and fig-ure1).
Meanwhile, most countries systematically collect information on the number of con-
taminated or potentially contaminated site s. The figures received indicate a quite
good awareness of the problem in Europe. The contaminated land data gatheredwithin the Working Group „Brownfield Re development“ match very well with other
international data releases, such as th ose from the European Environment Agency
(EEA).
050.000100.000150.000200.000250.000300.000350.000400.000Number of suspected Contaminated Sites /
Brownfields in Hectares
Austria
BelgiumDenmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
IrelandItaly
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Sweden
United KingdomEstimated number of contaminated sites
Brownfields in hectares
Fig. 1: Brownfileds and Contaminated Sites in Europe
Only a few countries have made surveys or other activities to specify the extent of
the brownfield problem in terms of estimating the total size of land that is covered.Traditionally industri al countries provided figures regarding the extent of brown-
fields on the national level. For exam ple, in Germany 128.000 hectares, in the United
Kingdom 39.600 ha, in France 20.000 ha, in the Netherlands between 9.000 and 11.000
hectares, and in Belgium / Walloon about 9.000 hectares of brow nfields were esti-
mated or identified. For the Flanders region of Belgium, the scope of brownfields has
been characterised by the number of known unoccupied business accommodation
sites, which adds up to 4000. In early 2001 5.500 ha of brownfields was estimated in
the region of Flanders. Italy, which allocated a brownfield density to the industrial-ised North of the country provided a regional figure for the Province of Milan where
a surface area of 1260 hectares is estimated to be brownfields.

Brownfields in Europe
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria11
For other countries, like Gr eece, Austria and Denmark th e problem of brownfields is
identified as relevant, but there is no data available yet.

M-0## (1999) Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austr ia12 Titel der Publikation – Titel des jeweiligen Kapite ls
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austr ia12 CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopme ntTable : Brownfields and suspecte d contaminated sites in Europe
Suspected/potential
contaminated sitesBrownfields in
hectaresRegional Concentrations Sources
Austria 2.500 n.d. Mur-Mürz-Furche, Linz, Vienna Umweltbundesamt Wien, 2000
Belgium 5.528 (Wallonia)
53.000 (estim./Flanders)9.000 (Wallonia)
5.500 (Flanders)GEHAT, Université Brux-
elles,2000 ; EEA, 1999
Denmark 30.000 n.d. Danish EPA, 2001
Finland 20.000 n.d. Helsinki EEA, 1999 ; Finish Environment
Institut, 2000
France 200.000 – 300.000(estim.) 20.000 Nord-Pas-de Calais, Lorraine, Rhône–Alpes EEA, 1999 ; Ministére de
l´Environnement, 2000
Germany 362.000 128.000 Eastern Germany/ Berlin, Ruhr Area, Saar Re-
gionUmweltbundesamt Berlin, 2000
Greece n.d. n.d. Lavrion/Attika (mining), Aliverion Evoia (lig-
nite mining)Ministry of environment, 2001
Ireland 2.300 (estimated) n.d. Dublin area, Cork area Env. Protection agency, 2000
Italy 9.000 1260 (Milan
Province)Lombardia (Milan Province), Piemonte, Veneto,
Campania (Naples/Bagnoli), Calabria (Crotone)EEA, 1999; anpa, 2001
Netherlands 110.000 – 120.000 (estim.) 9.000 – 11.000 EEA, 1999; Environmental Minis-
try, 2000
Norway 2100 n.d.
Portugal 2.000 n.d. Lisbon / (chemi cal-Industry), Norte (Textile),
Porto (Metal)Lab. Nac. de Engenhaira Civil,
1998
Spain 4.900 n.d. Madrid, Basque country, Asturi as, Catalonia Ministerio de Medio Ambiente,
2001
Sweden 7.000 n.d. n.d. EEA, 1999; OECD, 1998
UnitedKingdom100.000 (estimated) 39.600 Mersey Tyneside, Yorkshire Midlands, South
Wales, Scotland, LondonDOE, 1993

5 INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES OF BROWNFIELDS
Many countries recognise that the presence of brownfields is a complex problem that
goes far beyond single economic, environmental or urban and social concerns. A va-
riety of stakeholders are in volved and they have different perspectives and different
needs. A number scientific and practical elem ents are recognised and are in use, but
practical solutions for the redevelopment of brownfields need to be multidisciplin-
ary, including environmental science, engineering and technology, spatial and urban
planning, information science, law, sociology, economics, political administration
and regulation. Consequently, the problem of brownfield redevelopment, especially
in inner-city locations plays an important ro le in initiatives, policy and research out-
puts of several international institutions. They are part of European and International
research and policy activities in the cont ext of spatial planning , economic and envi-
ronmental restoration and social and technical science. Some activities are outlinedbelow.
5.1 European Commission
By defining the economic co nditions in the common mark et and exercising sectoral
control – such as for the co al, steel and ship building industries – the European Un-
ion has stimulated structural change an d economic modernisation. On the other
hand since the 1970s many industrial sites have become derelict. As a consequence,
European Union regional development, en vironmental protection and recent urban
initiatives show a strong focus on brownf ields as a key element in spatial develop-
ment.
Typical instruments of th e European Union include:
• directives (legal framework);
• analysis and recommendat ions on policy themes;
• research, demons tration projects or training;
• financial support (essential vi a the structural funds of the Union), grants and al-
lowances.
As far as the revitalisation of derelict industrial sites is concerned, to date direct fi-
nancial support of projects by the European Regional Development Fund (managedby the REGIO directorate general) is the main instrument used.
The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) is intended to compensate the
greatest regional imbalances within the Community. For target regions this in gen-eral comprises funds for th e rehabilitation and revitalis ation of derelict industrial
sites under different programmes. In addition to Community funding schemes, sec-
tor-specific “Community Initiatives” support structural change in traditional indus-
trial regions. These programmes directly initiated by the Commission in co-operationwith the national and regional governments, are limited in time and content. This is

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria14
in particularly true for the programmes ”RESIDER” for steel sites, ”RECHAR” for
coalfields, ”RENAVAL” for ship building si tes and ”RETEX” for textile industry
sites. Taking into account the increasing urban problems in European metropolitanareas the “URBAN” initiative focuses on wider regeneration projects. In the contextof these special programmes, considerable funds are often provided for the rehabili-
tation of brownfield sites.
In 1992 the first community funded research study on iron and steel brownfield
problems was published by the European Commission and the Association of Euro-
pean Regions of Industrial Techno logies (RETI) (COMMISSION EUROPEENNE,
1992). This study outlines urba n development, ecological an d economic aspects of the
problem. The extent of brownfields from coal and steel industry in western Europe
alone was estimated to be approximately 200.000 hectares (including opencast lignite
mines). A catalogue of recommendations submitted to the Commission underlined
the needs:
• for an integrated strategy for derelict land;
• to draw up a definition of derelict sites;
• to quantify, inventory and describe derelict land;
• to provide financial efforts for the Community;
• to develop a system of gradual treatment;
• to ameliorate risks;
• to encourage applied research proj ects. (COMMISSION EUROPEEENE, 1992)
In October 1998 the European Commission adopted the Communication Sustainable
Urban Development in the European Union: A Framework for Action (COM(98)605),
setting out objectives for urban areas and a range of existing and proposed actions toaddress these. A more strategic and integr ated approach to urban issues at European
level has been adopted. Urban problems are going to remain high on the European
agenda, with enlargemen t of the EU bringing new challe nges. As part of its contri-
bution to maintaining the focus on urban policy development, DG Environment de-
cided to re-launch the Urban Environment Expert Group and to set up a series of
Working Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ s to explore areas of policy in which
there may be scope for further action by the Commission. Brownfield issues play amajor role in the context of sustainable land use (EXPERT GROUP on the Urban En-vironment, 2000). The European Commi ssion will adopt the report in 2001.
5.2 US-Environmental protection agency (EPA)
The EPA’s Brownfields Econom ic Redevelopment Initiati ve, as outlined in the
brownfields Action Agenda, is designed to assist states, communities, and other or-
ganisations or individuals in assessing, cleaning up, sustainably reusing and pre-venting future brownfield. (E PA, 1998) The EPA recognises that a major impediment
to enduring environmental and economic health is the inability to achieve sustain-

International Perspectives of Brownfields
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria15
able redevelopment. Therefore, the ultima te success of the brownfield initiative is
contingent upon a project’s ability to stimulate sustainable environmental restoration
and economic development.
As part of the national brownfields in itiative, the EPA has awarded co-operative
agreements to states, cities, towns, counties, and tribes to demonstrate pilot studies.
These should test brownfields assessment models, direct special efforts toward re-
moving regulatory barriers without sacrif icing protectiveness, and facilitate co-
ordinated public and private efforts at the federal, state and loca l levels. These Pilot
Project grants are intended to be a catalyst to the sustainable redevelopment of
brownfields sites. This is accomplished by providing public funds to stimulate local
government organisations into creating the impetus and maintaining control of theproject process and ou tcomes, providing technical support during the early stages of
a project, and inducing private capital investment. By addr essing these needs
through a series of demonstration Pilot Projects, the agency is striving to develop theknowledge, experience, and public conf idence required for continued implementa-
tion of future brownfield projects at the local community level (EPA, 1998).
5.3 OECD’s Territorial Development Service
The OECD Service brought together four distinct areas of policy research that had a
common interest in the terr itorial concept and that ca n suggest, jointly and sepa-
rately, innovative policy responses. These are the Group of the Council on Rural De-velopment, the Group on Urban Affairs , the Local Economic and Employment De-
velopment (LEED) Programme, and the Work ing Party on Regional Development.
The Territorial Development Service offers a way for the common experiences andoutlooks of these four groups to be brought together in a collaborative effort to ar-ticulate the new territorial concept through individual and joint projects and activi-
ties.
The Territorial Development Service is conc erned with giving practical assistance to
governments so that they are able to focus sectoral policies in relation to territorialcontext, encouraging the creation and deve lopment of locally dr iven initiatives for
economic development, and integrating the two approaches into a coherent strategic
approach. The Service seeks to combine the best elements from a variety of comple-mentary territorial development strategies. The top-down and exogenous develop-
ment strategy often emphasised by gover nment-led regional development policies is
important as a tool for redu cing territorial disparities.
With support from the US Environmental Protection Agency, the Working Group
„Brownfield Redevelopment“ on urban affa irs undertook a comparative study of the
economic outcomes of efforts to regenerate urban brownfields in several countries
(EPA, 1998). The main objective of the st udy was to assist governments to develop
sustainable policies and methods for ac hieving sustainable brownfield redevelop-
ment with positive economic outcomes and benefits to society.

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria16
The report (OECD, 1998 ) highlighted:
• insufficient information concerning the number of brownfields and vacant sites in
cities, and about the economic, social and environmental outcomes of redevelop-ment;
• the contradictory practice of permitting greenfield development whilst attempting
to redress the serious environmental, economic and social problems associated
with urban brownfield;
• the inflexibility of policy and legislation which inhi bits the redevelopment of
brownfield sites.

6 NATIONAL BACKGROUNDS
This section describes the key features of national backgrounds of brownfield rede-
velopment across Europe in relation to po licy and programmes. The members of the
CLARINET network have assisted in the prov ision of information for this analysis.
Additionally, literature revie ws and expert interviews have been conducted. More
detailed country specific information is attached to this report in annex 1.
6.1 Policy – an overview
Over the past decades the “brownfield” is sue has been a particular topic of discus-
sion in the traditional industrial regions of Europe. Today many European cities are
affected. Although the underlying conditio ns are different, there are derelict indus-
trial sites in the traditional industrial ce ntres and in metropolitan cities like London
and Barcelona, as well as in peripheral locations such as the Brandenburg lignite
fields. The different condit ions have led towards different strategies and pro-
grammes to support redevelopment. However, three typical categories can be identi-fied and characterised.
Traditional industrial areas
As a result of the massive decline in indust rial jobs in the coal, steel and textile in-
dustries at the beginning of the 1980s, governments had to actively promote struc-
tural change in industry. Comprehensive strategies and programmes of derelict land
revitalisation have been develo ped, particularly in the tr aditional industrial regions
of the United Kingdom, France (Lorra ine, Nord-Pas de Calais) and Germany
(Northrhein-Westphalia). (FERBER, 1995).
Due to the dominance of the coal and steel in dustries in these regions very large sites,
having a low land value and high rehab ilitation and de contamination costs are left
derelict. Here, governmental intervention was essential as property market forces
alone were not robust enough to solve the problem. Since the beginning of the 1980s
in the UK, France and Germany, initiatives have been developed which favour a re-
gional derelict land policy and specific derelict land recycling programmes. These
initiatives were triggered on the one hand by increasing awareness of the negativeeconomic and ecological effects of the derelict sites and on the other by recognition of
the positive development potential for such sites.
In the UK, Germany and France, regional , national and European funding was pro-
vided to initiate derelict land recycling pr ogrammes in traditiona l industrial areas,
projects effectively paid for by tax revenues. As it was clear from the beginning that
significant finance would be required for a long period of time, funds had to be con-
centrated on specific initiatives.

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria18
Special programmes were started because:
• the tasks required in terms of urban de velopment, structural policy and environ-
mental policy were very complex and required a cross-sectional approach;
• it was evident that the exis ting actors would have imple mentation problems, i.e. in
particular the affected municipal admini strations. On their own, municipalities
would never have been able to handle such large derelict sites, due to insufficient
resources (both experienced personnel and funding), difficu lties in establishing a
workable framework accounting for th e different needs of municipalities and
weakness in their powers to enforce reha bilitation procedures on landowners;
• the increasing importance of open space protection which placed limits on
“greenfield” industrial developments.
Initial objectives related to st ructural policy are also central to all the case studies re-
viewed. Brownfields are often identified as an obstacle to investment. However for
many municipalities they also constitute an important economic development po-
tential, although one which is difficult to mobilise. Most of th e special programmes
reviewed also offer approaches to solving urban development, social and ecologicalissues. These include:
• restricting greenfield consumption by re-using brownfields;
• functional and design improvement of the a ffected urban structures by eliminating
the derelict sites and associated meas ures aimed at general urban renewal;
• preserving the architectural heritage of the industrial revolution by finding new
uses for historic industrial buildings;
• increasing the skills of unemployed people by derelict land recycling, via the crea-
tion of employment opportunities;
• improvement of environmental quality, e.g. by encapsulating or removing con-
taminated soil and restoring the land scape distorted by industrial use.
A closer look at the individual projects shows that in practice different regional
strategies exist:
In Northern France, for instance, derelict sites were primarily removed to restore an
attractive outer appearance to the region and thus attract private investors to newlydeveloped industrial “greenfield” sites. In this context, use of the recycled areas and
the removal of contaminated material were coincidental.
Ecological rehabilitation has been a success ful theme for the Ruhr area. Here ecologi-
cal damage is remedied by combining ecological necessities with economic objec-
tives. The aim was to develop environmenta lly friendly industry and to mobilise ar-
eas that can be re-used by industry. Thus the “necessity” resulting from the discov-
ery of extensive contamination on the areas bought up by the property fund wasturned into a “virtue”, althou gh the rehabilitation of thes e areas had not been identi-
fied as an aim when the property fund was set up (LEG, 1999).
Classical objectives of economic development – attraction of inward investment, for
example by the establis hment of business and industrial parks, job creation, etc. –

National Backgrounds
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria19
have been at the centre of policy in the UK for over 30 years. These programmes have
been accompanied by ecological improvemen t in areas damaged by former use. In
recent years, there has been new emphasis on the reuse of brownfield sites for muchneeded housing land.
To summarise, whilst structural policy aims are still dominant in all programmes,
ecological objectives have increased in importance.
Special programmes are becom-
ing more focussed and increasingly account for the interactions taking place on the
“brownfield redevelopment” issue. In additio n, it was essential in some regions, no-
tably the coalfields of South Wales and As turias, to address the physical hazard pre-
sented by the historic imposition of indu strial activity namely, land instability caused
by mine wastes.
Growing Metropolitan areas
The structurally strong metropolitan area s in the European Union are characterised
by a dynamic land market in the wake of the growing service sector. Industrial usesdating back to the 19
th century are subject to displace ment pressure and have been
moved to peripheral areas during the urban sprawl process. Together with existing
large-scale railway and harbour infrastructure facilities, the urban areas are subject to
re-use pressure that is in some cases reinforced by speculative land banking.
The interest, use and ownership conflicts resu lting from such a situation lead to large
areas of derelict land in urban areas. Thus brownfields have been identified in most
European cities. The strategies to deal with this focus on urban planning with large-scale projects being driven by architectu ral competitions, mast er plans and investor
planning. Specific brownfield problems, like the presence of contamination, infra-
structure requirements and the specific underground co nditions for construction
purposes, are often inadequately considere d. This can lead to considerable difficul-
ties, failure of strategies to deliver effective and sustainable regeneration and on oc-
casion, complete project failure.
Less attractive ”brownfields” in peripheral locations with low property market val-
ues are often insufficiently used. Intermediate uses have become a serious problemfor urban development in the areas concerned.
Rural areas
Rural areas within the EU also contain in dividual derelict sites, some of which are
extensive in area, which may be very significant for the municipality concerned.
These are mainly connected with past agricu lture, forestry or mining. These activities
may have been undergoing a consolidation process resulting in the abandonment of
many sites. Recently, many former military sites have been released to the market
due to tremendous political change and related political relaxation. The municipali-
ties affected by such processes are often unable to solve the problems presented byabandoned sites and are reluctant to develo p revitalisation activities. The necessity to
develop strategies and programmes is also often not recognised on regional or na-

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria20
tional level. This means that these areas ar e simply left as they are, unless funds are
provided from the European Regional Development Fund.
6.2 Specific national and regional programmes
Although there is increased political aw areness of brownfield issues, to date many
European countries and regions do not have any specific programmes supporting
brownfield redevelopment. Although funding from economic, environmental or ur-
ban programmes is generally available, it often has had to be integrated into a land
management policy at a local or regional level.
Contaminated land programmes have been se t up in many European countries. Most
of them have established a public budget in order to finance major clean up meas-
ures. (EEA, 1999; CARACAS, 1998). Specific schemes for brownf ield rehabilitation
exist in France (Nord-Pas de Calais, Lo rraine), Germany (Northrhein-Westphalia),
the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Schemes in preparatio n are registered in
Spain and Flanders.
Activities at the programme level have to take account of constraints and require-
ments such as time scales attached to land acquisition, land valu ation difficulties, and
legal matters, along with the technical and economic risks for the developer. Based
on general policy considerations programmes also need to set priorities for individ-
ual projects and objectives.
In France brownfields are defined as “…spac e previously been developed that are
temporarily definitively abandoned following the cessation of activity; and, that need
to be reclaimed for a future use. They can be partially occupied, derelict, or contami-
nated”. Long-term polic ies and programmes exist in the traditional industrial regions
piloted by Lorraine. Since the 1980s, and in the context of the na tional “contract de
plan” – funded by the state, region and th e EU -specific brownfield reclamation pro-
grammes have been developed. It was im portant to create a new economic founda-
tion and modernise urban and infrastructu re layouts, which had been exclusively
geared to the former industrial use. Al together, 3.350 ha of derelict industrial land
was treated between 1987 and 1998. Due to the re gional dominance of derelict land, a
joint intervention of national, regional, and local actors was necessary. At the begin-
ning it was clear that it would not be possible to immediately find new uses, the
strategy developed in 1986 concentrated on the rapid improvemen t of the ecological
situation through large-scale landscape treatment. Preparation of the land for new
uses, which involves much higher costs, is a medium and long-term task. Therefore,all efforts were focussed on overcoming th e negative image caused by derelict land.
The programme priorities were based on:
• the first, and simple priority of rapid identification of derelict land;
• the establishment of a regional development agency;
• a clear and comprehensive methodol ogy – „requalification sommaire“;

National Backgrounds
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria21
• adequate and regular funding;
• a partnership of all parties involved;
• support for the preparation and developm ent of derelict land for the implementa-
tion of leading projects with regard to the development of the agglomeration.
Ordinary "re-qualification" (" requalification sommaire" ) is clearly preferred if any
after-use project could be defined. The derelict land strategy known as "Remise en
état" contains:
• demolition as well as clea ring work in the area;
• construction of terraces and planting , enclosing or the planting of screening trees;
• construction of recreational paths;
• where necessary, treatment of contamination using all legal instruments to make
the polluter pay.
Subsequently, the properties are to be ma naged on a regional level and in individual
cases left to the free property market. The executive body of this part of the pro-
grammes is the regional development agency, the "Establishment Public Foncier de
la Metropôle Lorraine" EPML, 1996). EPML had been en trusted with the realisation
of this strategy. Since 1970 EPML, which has been created by the central state in or-
der to implement land policies with local authorities, has been undertaking planning
and developing tasks.
Due to financial support by the state, the re gional council, the agency itself and the
European Fund for regional development, it was possible to mobilise a total of 800
million FF between 1986 and 1997, in order to implement the new derelict land pol-
icy. By 1997, 3.350 ha of derelict land had b een treated. Two th irds of the money
came from the Lorraine Region, the French State and the EPML. One third came fromthe EU. All in all, 97 locations in 109 communi ties were treated. Since treatment, 30 %
of the sites have been re-used for econom ic purposes, 22 % remain available, 17 %
used for parks, 27 % designated for natu re and 4 % developed for housing. Due to
the strong position of EPML, the industrial land owners were persuaded to sell theirproperty at favourable prices. At the same time, partial sales of attractive and unen-
cumbered properties directly by the owner was prevented.
The strategy chosen was exemplary as it succeeded in linking the interests of the pri-
vate property owners, the community and other actors in the framework for a co-ordinated regional master strategy. The regional stakeholders are co-operating in a
common network with research activities and international services.
In 1998, the Federal Ministry for the Environment in Germany published the Draft
Environmental Programme with a set of polit ical objectives: The following relate to
brownfield redevelopment:
• rehabilitation of industrial sites and elimination of hazards to human beings and
the environment;
• reintegration of rehabilitated sites into the economic cycle;

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria22
• reduction of land consumpti on from a current 120 hectar es per day (status 1998) to
30 hectares per day by 2020.
Various development agencies have develope d regional brownfield initiatives in the
Federal states, for example the ”Lande sentwicklungsgesellschaft Nordrhein-
Westfalen” (LEG,1999). By establishing a Property Fund in 1982 the region has made
the redevelopment of brownfield sites an d disused buildings central to its policy of
creating an integrated urban development model. The activities of the Property Fund
go beyond the establishment of new attractive business parks. They include:
• the accumulation of wide experience in the economic framework and prudent
dealing with contaminated and derelict sites;
• placing quality targets in urban construc tion before purely economic considera-
tions, whether it is the architectural pla ns for the commercial building itself, or sur-
rounding landscaping and recreational areas and facilities;
• preserving industrial architecture wh ich had been abandoned and which bears
witness to the history of the industrialisation which was so important to this state;
• safeguarding monuments such as the co almine Zollverein XII in Essen or the
Landscape Park in North Duisburg, which are now becoming new tourist and
cultural attractions within the Ruhr area.
Until the late 1990’s 2.400 hectar es in 178 locations have b een purchased. Of these,
971 hectares have so far been rehabilitat ed, developed and placed on the market. 61%
of the developed business sites have been sold. This is a significant success given thatthere are many other sites available on market. Many brownfield redevelopment
projects have been part of the International Building Exhibition (IBA) at Emscher
Park. The exhibition was completed in 1999. The IBA aimed to provide overall im-
pulses for the ecological, ec onomic and social restructur ation by providing new land-
scape schemes, brownfield reconversion e. g. for technology centres and innovative
housing schemes.
Since the German reunification specific brownfield problems emerged in the new
German states. High greenfield consumption promoted by tax incentives met the
decline of industry and military conversion . The high stock of brownfields e.g. 18.000
ha in Saxony, is widely seen as a majo r handicap for the urban and economic re-
structuring. The region of Saxony began in mid 2001 with a new integrated and in-
terdepartmental brownfield redevelopment program funded by the European Union.
The project is testing a stepwise approach investigating technical options including
cost optimisation for the interim management of brownfields (demolition and con-servation of buildings, management of risks and interim landscaping).
In the Netherlands , urban brownfield site s are defined as “… areas in towns and cities
where in the past industrial acti vity has taken place, but whic h have since fallen into disuse
(MINISTRY OF HOUSING, 1998)” . In such areas there is often a combination of a
weak social, economic and spatial structure. The position of these inner city sites can
be strengthened by restructuring and urban economic development. The Dutch havefewer and more specific issues with brownfield sites in comparison to other coun-

National Backgrounds
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria23
tries, due to the long planning tradition in the Netherlands and the relatively high
demand for space in urban areas. The Netherlands uses an integrated approach,
meaning that efforts are made to produce a coherent solution drawing from variouspolicy sectors and from different administrati ve levels. The result is a policy ‘patch-
work quilt’, in which central government, the provinces and the municipalities have
very different responsibilities and tasks.
The investment costs needed for urban regeneration can largely be met from the re-
sulting benefits. Government policy tends to leave it to the private sector to tackleurban areas. It will no longer bear the brunt of investment costs. Where the costs are
not fully covered by the benefits, the gov ernment will provide a safety net, but even
then, it will have a supporting rather than a leading role. The government’s contri-
bution will generally be directed towards in creasing amenity value and the attrac-
tiveness of the areas concerned as places to live, work and do business.
There are several governmental grant schemes to cover the shortfall in funding for
redevelopment projects often linked to various policy programmes. For example:BELSTATO urban renewal fund (appr oximately NLG 800 million – 363 million
EURO per year available over the period 1990-2005). A number of other specific
sources of funding are also available. Thes e generally are linked to a particular char-
acteristic or a component of the project concerned. Schemes such as StiREA and sub-sidies granted under the major cities po licy are intended sp ecifically to promote
commercial activity in cities. A multiplicity of specific acti vities which strengthen the
economic structure of cities would qualify for subsidies, su ch as the construction and
revitalisation of industrial estates, shar ed industrial premises and developing com-
mercial property in deprived areas.
A single project can often obtain funding from a number of different financial
schemes that relate to different aspects of the plan. For several years the govern-ment’s environmental policy has been direc ted towards “external integration”, i.e.
encouraging other policy sectors to accept greater responsibility for the environment
and the costs associated with the environment, especially where relevant to sectorialdevelopment or implementat ion. Many sector ial policy documents and programmes
have already included provisions for the clea n-up of contaminated land in their proj-
ect cost estimates. This is the case, fo r example, for StiREA, the urban renewal fund.
The Soil Protection Act includes provisions relating to the costs of cleaning up con-
taminated land. A total of about NLG 500 million (227 million EURO) is available
each year. Where a site is severely cont aminated and is deem ed to be environmen-
tally urgent, the clean up is assumed in pr inciple to be the resp onsibility of the par-
ties concerned. It is firstly the party who caused the contamination, and otherwisethe owner/leaseholder, who is responsibl e for investigating the problem, drawing
up remediation plans and carrying out the necessary measures (and who also bears
the costs). If the party who caused the problem or owner/leaseholder refuses to carryout the necessary remedial work, the government can resort to coercion. The gov-ernment will act as safety net and carry out the work itself only where the clean-up is
not performed or where the case is environmentally urgent. In some cases it is a

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria24
public body which has caus ed the contamination or which owns land, and which
therefore has to bear the costs of clean up. The provinces are responsible for co-
ordinating soil clean up activities under th e Soil Protection Act. In their soil clean up
programmes the provinces indicate which site s will be tackled from the government
budget each year. However, the number of sites requiring clean-up far exceeds the
available budget. In practice this means that only urgent projects are tackled quickly
under the Soil Protection Act. Priorities for tackling sites based on environmentalcriteria often do not correspond with th e desired planning regime for the develop-
ment of urban brownfield sites. In order to resolve this problem, municipalities can,
with the agreement of the province, start projects in advance of Soil Protection Act
funds being made available if they cover th e initial financing. This possibility is lim-
ited however, because no guarantees can be given in advance about the size of future
budgets and grants.
In the United Kingdom significant government programmes promote and support
brownfield redevelopment. These can be split into four types of programmes:
• Spatial planning;
• Technical support;
• Financial support; and
• Direct development by p ublic bodies and agencies.
The system of “town and country planni ng” promotes brownfield redevelopment
largely by inhibiting or preventing development projects on greenfield sites, and by
making brownfield land available for develo pment. This is brought about by a hier-
archy of:
national planning policy (set out by national government in Planning Policy Guid-
ance notes);
• regional planning policy (set collectively by local government bodies in the region
and the Regional Development Agency), which also includes overall “structure”
planning for the region;
• local structure and developm ent plans (set by the co unty and district councils)
which make zoning decisions for the future use of particular areas of land in the
area, and
• individual decisions on applications for planning permission (made by local plan-
ning authorities) which normally should conform with the relevant development
plan.
Of particular relevance is a new requirem ent, set out in Planning Policy Guidance
Note 3 Housing (DETR 2000b), for a “sequential te st” for new developments. This
test means that before allocating any greenfield land for new housing projects, a local
planning authority has first to satisfy itself that there are no suitable and available
sites in the area which have been previously developed.
Technical support takes both “pro-active” and “re-active” forms. On the “pro-active”
side, national government and other private sector led groups fund research and de-

National Backgrounds
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria25
velopment, and the developmen t of “best practice” advice to assist the development
and construction industries in working on brownfield sites.
On the “re-active” side, the focus is on removing factors that might inhibit brown-
field redevelopment. This work includes:
• research and development on the applicat ion of new remediation techniques and
technologies;
• confidence-building initiatives with the financial and property sectors;
• setting out a system of liability for contaminated land;
• reviewing the licensing system for land remediation activities, and
• wider policy development on issues such as “land assembly” for larger develop-
ment projects, and changes to the system of compulsory purchase by publicauthorities.
Brownfield redevelopment is eligible for dir ect and indirect public sector financial
support where this is necess ary to achieve social and economic policy objectives. This
support can take a number of different forms, such as:
• grant aid, either for particular elements of the costs of development or as “gap
funding”;
• support for loans, including paym ent of interest and guarantees;
• other guarantees, e.g. inco me stream guarantees, support for warranty purchase;
• partnership projects with ri sk and profit sharing, and
• tax incentives, e.g. 150% tax credit for cost of site clean up as part of redevelopment
projects and a proposed cut in property sales tax in areas of social and economic
disadvantage.
Direct funding is generally provided by na tional government through arms’ length
public sector regeneration agencies – English Partnerships and the network of Re-
gional Development Agenci es in England; the Wels h Development Agency; and
Scottish Enterprise. In some cases, the funding is provided through local authorities,either directly from national government or via the national or regional regeneration
agencies. In addition to these national sources of funding, other projects receive sup-
port through Objectives 1 and 2 of the European Regional Development Fund andother structure funds (such as RECHAR and RENAVAL).
Funding regimes available in England to support brownfield redevelopment have
recently been the subj ect of scrutiny by the EU in te rms of compliance with state aid
regulations and EU competitio n policy. These regulations place strict limits on the
geographical availability of financial support for privat e sector development, and
also on the amount of support for any individual project. Some regimes have been
approved by the European Commission, others are being submitted for approval.
The public sector regeneration agencies and local authorities also carry out “direct
development” projects of the following kinds:
• fully worked-up developments;

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria26
• preparing “development platforms” for s ubsequent development by the private
sector;
• more simple “site clea rance” projects and
• providing roads and other infrastructure on or near potential redevelopment sites.
In common with other Member States, the UK has implemented Integrated Pollution
Prevention & Control legislation (IPPC) wh ich partly addresses brownfield preven-
tion by placing an obligation on industry to restore land to the condition prior to the
regulated use.
Some smaller countries deal on a region al level with brownfield programmes, like
Flanders in Belgium and Ireland.
Recent changes in the Organisation of Town and Country Planning of Flanders , has
resulted in a spatial planning system that covers the whole region of Flanders. Zonesreserved for industry, farmland, housing, etc, have been defined. This plan has re-
sulted in restricted areas for industrial purposes and has ther efore stimulated the
remediation of contaminated sites.
The Department of Environment and Local Government (DELG) makes policy on the
environment in Ireland , with the EPA offering technical advice on relevant issues.
Since 1986 the DELG has developed and implemented an Urban Renewal Scheme
that provides measures for a planned, inte grated and focused approach to urban re-
newal. The urban renewal scheme must address the physical, economical, social andenvironmental regeneration and rejuvenati on of urban areas. The scheme gives fi-
nancial incentives for developers to develo p brownfield sites in urban areas. Under
the guidelines for the 1998 Urban Renewal Sc heme local authorit ies are responsible
for the selection and prioritisi ng of sites and key developments to be included in In-
tegrated Area Plans (IAP’s). In selection and prioritisation of sites, local authorities
must identify areas where ther e are substantive barriers to redevelopment. Priority
will be given to areas in cities and towns wi th strong urban characteristics where the
greatest concentrations of physical deca y, social and econom ic disadvantage occur.
Where a local authority design ates an area for inclusion in the scheme, this must be
justified on the basis that such financial in centives are required to overcome identifi-
able, substantive barriers to development. Contamination constitu tes a potential bar-
rier to development.
In other countries the decision-making processes are dominated by the site-specific
approach handled by responsible authorities. For example in Norway , the pollution
control authority prioritises the handling of cases where buildings and construction
is planned on contaminated sites by providing permits in corporating environmental
criteria. These are structured to allow sound solution, but also with sufficient consid-
eration of economic issues.
Some countries, like Austria have no central governmental plans for supporting
brownfield redevelopment, but single pr ogrammes in specific regions are more
common. For example, the City of Vienna has initiated specific local programmes.
Since the development of peripheral urba n development zones needs both time and

National Backgrounds
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria27
substantial financial means, the use of existi ng unused spaces is given priority. These
urban areas are often partially equipped with infrastructure. The capitalisation of the
land can support many of the companies in their restructuring activities, and theiruse makes no inroads into existing green spaces. In order to exploit those sites in im-portant areas for town planning, the City of Vienna uses two funds, the Vienna Busi-
ness Promotion Fund (WWFF) for industrial and commercial spaces and the Vienna
Land Provision and Urban Renewal Fund (W BSF) for housing space. The funds are
involved in the purchase, division and provis ion of sites, with tasks not strictly dif-
ferentiated between the two funds. Their activities also include the distribution of
subsidies. Co-operation between urban pla nners, the funds and the developers run
smoothly, although decision-making is not always easy. There are several examplesof targeted development of unused commercia l, industrial or infrastructural sites in
Vienna. They differ widely in size, planning and implementation.
In Portugal /Lisbon, the area of the EXPO98 site is the single programme supported
by public funding.
In Greece specific programmes supported by the Ministry of Environment concern
the area of Lavrion in Attica, the ”Thriassi on Pedion”, and the industrial area in the
Assopos river valley. Greece is planning to develop policies including special guide-
lines for reclamatio n and rehabilitation.
In Italy and Spain brownfield redevelopmen t is partly relevant under contaminated
land programmes. Italian public funds are available for a number of listed sites de-
fined as “sites of national interest” and are directed at contaminated sites with spe-
cial features (e.g. location , extension, heavy contamin ation, economic and social
stresses, urgency of redevelopment) that locally might justify a 'brownfield' label.
Some examples of these are Porto Marghera (Venice), the Bagnoli and Crotone sites.This is only the first part of a complete list to be expanded in the future on the basisof regional inventories and national gove rnmental provision. The initial budget for
rehabilitation of these sites is 500 million Eu ro, to be shared amongst fourteen sites.
In 1997 five programmes for redevelopment of urban areas (P.R.U .) were started in
the municipality of Milan invo lving a total surface of 160 hectares, prev iously occu-
pied by brownfields. Up to now only a part of the remediation works is achieved
with the construction of 4300 housing units, 4 urban park s, commercial and produc-
tive areas currently in progress. Around 700.000 Euro are invested, mainly by private
companies.
In Spain , the existing National Plan define s a 10-year period in which 132.000 million
pesetas ( 793 million EURO) are provided by the government to the Autonomous
Regions in order to address identified prob lems deriving from contaminated land.
6.3 Conclusion
The review of national approaches for th e redevelopment of brownfields in Europe
made quite clear that the problem is clea rly identified in many countries and action

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria28
has been taken. However, such action may not always be based on a national strat-
egy but rather relates to single or regional efforts to cope with the problem. Taking a
broad view across Europe, there is a genera l need for development of effective sup-
port systems for programme management for urban brownfield regeneration. It ishowever unlikely that a sing le model for the European Union would be sufficient.
The general overview also indicates that in urbanised areas, in many cases, the costs
for redevelopment will exceed the benefits . Therefore metropolitan regions will need
focused programme support, includin g different models for funding.

7 BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE / PROJECT
PROCEDURES
Brownfield project practice in Europe demo nstrates a range of different approaches
in specific urban and economic contexts . Within the work of CLARINET Working
Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ some sele cted case studies have been subject to
further evaluation. They are listed in table 2. By analysing planning methods, techni-
cal solutions and funding systems from examples across Euro pe, common problems
and solutions, as well as general research needs can be identified. Data sources con-
sist of project information from CLARI NET members, general literature, database
and published international projects.
7.1 Future use/Planning procedures
Determination of the after-use on former brownfield sites is one of the key elements
for the success of a project. In general considerations of after-use operate at two lev-els: strategic land-use planning and deta iled, site specific, planning decisions.
Land-use planning provides the overview that determines the general viability of
proposed after-uses and ensures that zoning of after-use is compatible with the sur-
roundings and conditions of the site. As brownfields are often located in mixed ur-
ban areas, many traditional industrial region s and cities have given priority to strate-
gic land use planning issues either at the urban level, or sometimes at the regional
level (e.g.: Thames Gateway/ London, IBA Emscher Park/ Germany, Mission duBassin Minier/ France). The German Minist ry of Transport, Building and Housing is
evaluating the possibilities fo r “Strategic land management ” in metropolitan areas as
a tool for urban or regional area based brownfield redevelopment policies. Site spe-
cific decisions should be integrated with the general needs of public investment andprivate property sector.

Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austr ia30 CLARIN ET – Brownfield Redevelopme ntTable 2: Project Examples
Country Projects Size Former use Project profile References
Austria Tar and Linoleum
Factory, Brunn am
Gebirge21 ha Linoleum
factoryConversion of the tar factory into a business park and a
residential areaCLARINET
(2000)
Belgium -FlandersFormer coal mines (6
sites in Limburg
province)1200 ha Coal mining The coal mining activities in Flanders were finished between
1986 and 1992. Due to this closure about 20.000 miners lost
their jobs. In view of the crea tion of new economic activities
there was a need for rehabilitation and redevelpment of the
former coal mines sites. Immediatly after the closure, demo-
lition of the installations started. Soil remediation and re-
stauration of some buildings was carried out. Six years after
the closure of the last site, each coal mine site has got a new
designation. Total cost: ca. 125 million /G189/G17Van Dyck &
Wille (2000)
OVAM &
TECHNUM (inpreparation)
Denmark Chemical factory,
“Soyakagen, Copen-
hagen17 ha Chemical
factoryThe former factory was situated at the harbour in Copenha-
gen. The area is being converted to a housing and business
area, with 1100 flats and 2-3000 jobs. The total cost of reme-
diation 10 –12 M. Euro. The area is seriously contaminated
with heavy metal e.g. mercury.
Finland Disused sawmill site
in the old industrialarea of Penttilä, Joen-
suu37 ha Sawmill The urban sawmill and industrial tip in the city of Joensuu
in the Eastern part of Finland. Planned to transform into a
residential, business, recreation and community area.CLARINET
(2000)
France Lille Tertiaire, Lille 3.8 ha Textile fac-
toryMulti – storey textile building with good architectural qual-
ity was transformed into offices and restaurants by a private
developer.CLARINET
(2000)
Steel works, Pompey,
Lorraine89 ha Steelworks Development of a new business centre and interim land
management for future developmentEPML (1996)

Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – AustriaBrownfield Redevelopment in Practice / Project Procedures 31Table 2: Project Examples (continued)
Country Projects Size Former use Project profile References
Germany Research and in-
novation centre –
Gelsenkirchen7 ha Steelworks The old Thyssen steel factory was transformed into a science
and business park.Lutze, A.
(1990).
VölklingerHütte, Saar120 ha Mining and
steelworksThe Völklinger Hütte is a historic inner-urban steel area in the
Saarland. In 1994, the Völkinger Hütte was registered on the
UNESCO world heritage list. Today it is a centre for art, indus-
try and culture. It also houses an industrial museumClausen, W.
(1991)
Hüls AG, Bot-trop41 ha Chemical and
coking industryHas been converted to a mixed use area including residential
area, buisiness area and parks. The project has been supported
by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). Projectwas started in 1996 and is expected to be completed in 2001.HochTief Um-
welt Gmbh,
2001
Greece Former mining
area, LavrionMining Lavrion is a historic mining area. Contaminated soils are an is-
sue here due to uncontrolled urban development. Redevelop-
ment strategies include new clean industries in connection with
an Industrial and Technological Research centre, development
of port facilities, and local tourism based on the remnants ofindustrial archaeology.CLARINET
(2000)
Italy Municipal Gas
Production /
Bovisa gas-works, Milan42 ha Gasworks This project started in February 1997. The objective of the rede-
velopment is the requalification of an abandoned industrial
area to new public functions.CLARINET
(2000), A. Mi-
lani, MilanMunicipality:
Netherlands Wolfsdonken’s
Hertogenbosch20 ha Mixed industrial
areaDe Wolfsdoken is an derelict industrial area in the West of the
centre of Hertogenbosch. The esta te is very mixed in character,
containing small and large, modern and outdated businesses.CLARINET
(2000)
Céramique
Maastricht23 ha Ceramic indus-
tryThe Ceramique site is situated at the edge of downtown Maas-
tricht between the historic quarter of Wyck and the Randwyckcommercial centreCLARINET
(2000)

Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austr ia32 CLARIN ET – Brownfield Redevelopme ntTable 2: Project Examples (continued)
Country Projects Size Former use Project profile References
Norway Mo I Rana Coal Mining Mo I Rana is a former coal mining refinery site, located in
the North of Norway. Following its closure in 1987 it was
sold to the municipality by the Ministry of Trade and Com-
merce. The objective of this project is the remediation of thecontaminated site together with its redevelopment, to
achieve positive economic uses to reinforce the local com-munity.OECD (1998)
Portugal Area of Seixal Metal and steel
industryOne of the important brownfield sites in Portugal – Lagoa da
Palmeira. Formerly used for smelting, steel and chemical
industries, there is mixed land contamination.CLARINET
(2000)
Chemical indus-try, area ofEstarrejaMixed industries Estarreja is located between Po rto and Aveiro in the coastal
fringe. This area is an industrial area with problems of con-
tamination of soils and waters. The main uses are related to
the chemical industry.CLARINET
(2000)
Spain Steel works in
Langreo, Astu-
rias30 ha Steelwork Transformation of the former steel works into a new indus-
trial estate and qualification centre.CLARINET
(2000)
Sweden Norrköpping Textile Norrköping is a form er textile manufacturing city. Conver-
sion of the industrial landscape into a dynamic urban centre
is promoted by the City of Norrköping, with support fromthe European Union.
Future uses include: Campus Norrköping university; infor-
mation technology and knowledge oriented companies;
cultural and residential facilities.OECD (1998)
United
KingdomBrynbach Park,
South Wales600 ha
park
15 ha
lakeMining A former coal mining area which was subject to extensive
opencast coal extraction and tipping. The site has been re-
claimed for recreational use, including the provision of a 15
ha lake The project provided a critical element for the re-
generation of the surrounding area.Richards (1993)

Brownfield Redevelopment in Practice / Project Procedures
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria33
The wide range of different after-uses in th e selected cased studie s detailed in Table 2
reflects quite specific consid erations for the needs of ur ban and economic systems. In
general, the focus on indust rial after-uses of the 1980s has changed towards the
mixed and flexible after-use co ncepts of today. For example:
• After 90 years of industrial usage the 21 hectare Tar –and –Linoleum –Factory site
in Brunn am Gebirge, Austria was transformed into a modern business park;
• The 42 hectare Municipal Gas Production -site in Milan (Bov isa Gasworks), Lom-
bardy Region of Italy, was redeveloped into a university campus, a recreational
area, parks and a residential area;
• The 37 hectare inner urban, old sawmill site of Penttilä, Finland, is planned for
conversion into a residential area, a business and recreation area and a community
area;
• The 23 hectare centre of ceramics indu stry since 1850, Maastr icht, Netherlands.
This is situated between the historic quarter and the new commercial centre. The
site has been transformed into office buildings;
• De Wolfsdonken, Netherlands is an obsolete industrial estate that lies to the west
of the centre of Hertogenbosch. The estate occupies an area of some 20 hectares,
and is very mixed in character, contai ning older and modern businesses, both
small and large. An academy of art is also located on the site. Overall, the area has
been neglected. The low intensity of site usage is reinforced by the presence of
burnt-out buildings belo nging to one of the companies. The site is also subject to
contaminated soil and groundwater, noise nuisance and odours;
• With the decline of the former industry during th e 1970s in the old textile manu-
facturing city of Norrköping, Sweden, a planning objective was determined toconvert the industrial landscape into a dynamic urban centre. Today a university
campus with 6000 – 7000 students, inform ation technology and knowledge ori-
ented companies have located on the site. Existing buildings have been extensively
re-used. for cultural and residential uses;
• A former coal refinery site, located in Mo I Rana, a small town in the north of
Norway was sold to the municipality by th e Ministry of Trade and Commerce fol-
lowing its closure in 1987. Mo I Rana’s econ omy relied on heavy industry until the
1980’s when both the coke and steel plant cl osed. At that time it was accepted that
the site was severely contaminated and so it was agreed that the department
would cover clean-up costs. Local authorities, national government and the private
sector partnered the initiative which co mprised the remediation of the contami-
nated site together with its redevelopment to achieve positive economic uses forthe local community. Consequently several new industrial plants have located on
the site providing large numbers of jobs;
However, some mixed-use projects have failed because of insufficient planning con-
trol systems:
• In the traditional mining region of Lavrion, south-east of Athens, Greece (where
silver and other metals have been proc essed since the 7th century BC, followed

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria34
more recently by the chemical industry , power production and other industries)
the economic cris is in the 1990s lead to rapid de-industrialisation. Several strategies
have been devised for the revitalisation. These include a new clean industries and
technological research centre; developmen t of port facilities to serve the Cyclades
Islands; and local tourism with industrial archaeology. Unfortunately this has re-
sulted in an uncontrolled ur ban development with mixed land uses e.g. residential,
recreational and agricultural activities where contaminat ion risks have been insuf-
ficiently considered;
From this experience, and recognising the complexity of brownfield projects, it is
clear that site-specific planning and assessment are integral to the proposed after-
uses of the site and vice-versa. Planning and site assessment are interactive processesto ensure that constraints an d aspirations are effectively addressed and proposals are
thus appropriate for the site. Compared to “greenfield projects” the planning activity
requires a wide information basis to define the location, size and distribution of all
retained features includin g historical buildings and in frastructures. Often infra-
structural links with surrounding land are not appropriate to the new use and need
to be improved. Specific planning aspect s like landform, drainage and vegetation
have to be integrated at an early stage of the planning phase. One current method ofworking in an integrated manner is the de velopment of a masterplan prior to starting
with formal planning procedures . (e.g.: Ceramics, Maastricht).
In this process stakeholder participation and community involvement represents a
major element in urban brownfield regeneration projects. For example, in the UKvoluntary organisations such as “Groundwork UK” play a major role in reclamation
projects for conservation and preservation of green spaces in an urban context. The
local community has deep influences on the brownfield redevelopment process, par-ticularly in the development of a masterpla n process, zoning decisions and the choice
of levels of cleanup and acceptable risk.
Increasing importance has been given towar ds preserving the industrial heritage as
an element of brow nfield redevelopment projects. For the fi rst time in 1994 the
UNESCO listed a former steel work-site "Völklinger Hütte “, Saar-region, Germany as
a UNESCO world heritage site. Many new projects try to incorporate their industrial
heritage in their conceptual outline for future uses, e.g.:
• technology and "start-up-centres“ using fo rmer industrial bu ildings for specific
image and advertising purp oses (e.g. Technology Center Oberhausen; Industri-
epark Langreo / Asturia);
• former warehouses in city centres that ar e transformed into lo ft apartments. (e.g.
Lille, France) ;
• leisure centres and garden festivals on former brownfields are integrating indus-
trial buildings and technical installations (e.g. South Wales; St eelwork Meiderich /
Duisburg, Germany);
• as a locality for industry-museums (e.g. Barcelona, Spain).

Brownfield Redevelopment in Practice / Project Procedures
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria35
This transformation of indu strial heritage buildings requ ires specific architectural,
engineering and legal knowledge and new qualification profiles for the building in-
dustries are appearing. Nevertheless cons ervation and refurbishment of industrial
buildings to reuse is often costly compar ed to demolition and reconstruction. The
legal protection of heritage law and related funding covers only a small amount of
buildings of specific architec tural or historical interest . These schemes are often too
restrictive in providing support for a more flexible change of use of former industrial
buildings.
7.2 Site preparation / technical procedures
Brownfield redevelopment requires expertise from a number of different technical
disciplines, which need to be effectively integrated to achieve a valid assessment of
feasibility. Decisions have to be made on such issues as;
• how to manage or treat any contamination problems;
• whether to dismantle or reuse exis ting buildings and infrastructures;
• the influence of any natu rally developing ecology.
• Development of techniques, and procedures to address all aspects has been pro-
gressing for a number of years, particularly within the traditional industrial re-
gions of Europe.
The need for an integrative planning and te chnical approach is demonstrated by the
case example of Lavrion , 60 km south-east of Athens , an area with 10.000 inhabi-
tants. It is a historic mining area with activities dating back to the 7th century BC.
Modern-day mining and metallurgy, focused on lead recovery, started again in 1864
and was the main activity up to the 1950s, wh en several others industries were es-
tablished in the area (textile, chemicals, power production etc). The crisis in tradi-
tional industries in the ea rly 1990s resulted in rapid de-industrialisation. Lavrion has
had to face dramatic environmental problems . Mining and metallurg ical activities for
more than 2.700 years have resulted in the ge neration of millions of tons of toxic and
hazardous waste, deposited all around the city. Moreov er, uncontrolle d urban de-
velopment has expanded on the top of these wastes, with mixed land uses, i.e. resi-
dential, recreational and agricultural acti vities. Natural processe s and systematic use
of wastes in several construction works have resulted in the widespread contamina-tion of soils. Further development of this area could only be achieved by an inte-
grated environmental, economic and spatial planning approach supported by all the
relevant actors.
Several European countries are providing spec ific guidelines to parts of this process –
mainly on co ntamination assessment (CARACAS, 1998). Brownf ield investigations
and risk assessment incorporates a wide range of technical and ecological aspects.
The site assessment process is based on a integrated approach in order to identify:
• risks to people or to the environment from the site in its present state;

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria36
• constraints on the future use of a site, such as poor ground conditions or areas of
contamination;
• the opportunities presented by a site, such as ecologi cal or wildlife value or the
presence of structures of historical importance;
• buildings and structures which cou ld be put to beneficial use and,
• materials which could be put to beneficial use.
In consequence site assessment and future site use are closely related, and a particu-
lar proposed site use will require the investig ation of aspects of th e site that are spe-
cific to the after-use concerned.
The complexity of brownfield sites requires a step by step approach to site assess-
ment according to the spec ific national regulation s (EEA, 1999,). A common ap-
proach to the initial stages of a ph ased site assessment will include :
• a walkover survey;
• a desk study, with pre liminary investigations;
• detailed investigatio ns and surveys; and,
• analysis of the in formation collected.
A critical appraisal of the information ga thered by the desk study and preliminary
investigations enable s identification of lik ely constraints on, an d opportunities for
the reclamation and reuse of the site. This analysis is used to en able the development
of the reclamation proposals to proceed in an informed way, and to include the
preparation of broad budget costing. In the European industrial regions the prepara-
tion of a reclamation scheme will generally involve a team of people from different
disciplines.
In the 1990s rapid advances in the de velopment of tec hniques for the decontamina-
tion of chemically polluted so ils and associated groundwater have been developed.
Environmental disasters, pressure group activities, and national governmental andEuropean policies and legislatio n, have focused attention on the need for safe options
for dealing with potentially toxic wastes and contaminated materials (EEA, 1999). At
many contaminated sites a combination of remedial techniques is often the most ap-propriate way to deal with contaminated material.
The remediation was part of the redevelopm ent process of a 42 he ctares area which is
now used as a university campus, a recreati onal area / parks and a residential area.
About 80.000 m³ of soil contam inated by PAH, Cyanide, Lead, Arsenic and Benzene
was remediated. In accordance with the Lombardy Region legislation of 1996, a spe-
cific risk analysis on the area was performed. Remedial investigation was carried out
from 1995 to 1999, with soil, gas and geophy sical surveys, drilling, collection and
analysis of soil samples and remedial planning. Remediation took place in 2 phases:
• first phase – on site soil washing – 1 year;
• second phase -soil venting in VOC (benzen e) localised contamin ated area- 3 years.

Brownfield Redevelopment in Practice / Project Procedures
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria37
Groundwater protection was monitored by th e installation of 40 sampling bore holes,
with monthly measurements of water table level, collection and chemical analysis of
groundwater. Groundwater is still slightly contaminated by PAH and ammonia, but
sources have been localised.
Nevertheless, contaminated soil presents a major challe nge to brownfield developers,
and the risks associated with the presence of potentially toxic chemicals in soil and
water need to be managed or reduced. For example European legislation on the pro-
tection of the water resources is expected to drive clean up of many sites. Each Euro-pean country has its own approach to the classification and treatment of contami-
nated sites, and to waste management and disposal practices. Current trends suggest
a common approach, where landowners, local authorities, central and regional gov-
ernments have increasing commitments tow ards the avoidance and clean-up of con-
taminated land.
Existing buildings can be a major element of risk in terms of safety and environ-
mental issues, but they also provide potential for brownfield regeneration. Thoughdemolition work is required in many cases, existing bui ldings can be adapted for
new uses when appropriate. Dealing with redundant buildings in the past was often
based on low cost demolition strategies where the demolition work was carried outfor the scrap value of the materials and machinery, e.g. in the New Länder of Ger-many in the beginning of the 1990s. Thes e demolition methods have subsequently
given rise to problems where unforeseen ground conditions were encountered dur-
ing site redevelopment, due to buried foun dation structures (RICHARDS, 1992). To-
day in the most western European countrie s, the rehabilitation of brownfields in-
volves the controlled identific ation and segregation of mate rials used in the original
construction. An inte grated and disciplined approach is adopted and the demolition
and site clearance works is carried out as part of a reclamation scheme specificallydesigned to suit the proposed end-use of the site.
Other specific technical procedures th at assist brownfie ld reclamation are:
• Pre-closure assessment: In general the presence of contaminating substance derives
from activities and processes which were or may still be carried out on a site. Much
information on the location of contamination will be gain ed from a pre-closure site
audit;
• Remodelling of landforms: A ssessment of achievable la ndforms requires informa-
tion on instability, presence of hazardous materials an d location of any residual
substructures. Other factors includethe re-use potential of materials, visual consid-
erations and land use needs or opportunities;
• The establishment and care of vegetation: The most successful revegetation scheme
matches the establishment of vegetation to the needs of the intended land use. A
temporary vegetation cover has been established on some reclaimed sites to en-hance their appearance to potential develo pers and to control erosion prior to de-
velopment being progressed.

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria38
7.3 Economic viability
Information available on the cost and benefits of brow nfield redevelopment projects
has proved to be very limited. Public and private project developers often cannot or
do not provide transparent information about property prices, treatment cost and
benefits. Nevertheless in general three di fferent economic types of redevelopment
could be identified (BÖRNER et al. 2000).
A: "Self-developing"
These are sites of local and regional impo rtance with high property value and low
reclamation costs that have their own dynamic development potential. In most casesthe redevelopment implies an increase of the va lue of the site and th ere is no need for
specific public sector intervention. Hence, the normal planning and administration
system can handle such redevelopment sites (MGP, Milan; Lille, Moulins; Ceramics
Maastricht).
B: "Passive-developing"Sites of local and regional importance with a specific development potential but with
accompanying risks of development, whic h therefore require dedicated advice and
assistance with planning and funding. In or der to achieve this, however, special pol-
icy concepts in the shape of public-private partnerships are often developed, since
they can be very effective. Risk sharin g and co-ordinated planning and financing of
projects by public-private co-operation should be seen as an ingenious approach to-ward this objectiv e (Swawmill/Penttilä).
C: "Non-developing sites"
These are sites without development potential at least during the foreseeable future.
These are the most problematic sites in our monostructural industrial regions. A highdensity of brownfield sites in a certain ar ea and low site values coupled with high
site preparation costs do not allow self-sus taining redevelopment. As a result, these
sites will not be reclaimed without addit ional mechanisms to make them viable
(Lavrion/Greece; Popey, Lorraine). Some sites require reclamation for ecological,environmental or safety reasons e.g. hillside spoil tips in the South Wales coalfield.
Recultivation, interim management and inte rim greening as “reserve sites” for po-
tential future development is one cost effective strategy in dealing with this large
category of brownfields.
Brownfield redevelopment is composed of multiple cost elements . The selected case
studies tend not to include general cost overviews. Budgets and funding are often
restricted to individual parts of the pr oject like decontamin ation, de molition or
equipment and not the whole process. Funding gaps and project failures are the con-sequence. A general financial package agreed in the initial stages of project develop-
ment, which includes an agreed allowance for variations in cost because of uncer-
tainties at the outset (a "contingency sum"), would be more able to provide a long-term basis for planning the project and ensu re that each phase of development will
not be delayed by shortfalls in resources.

Brownfield Redevelopment in Practice / Project Procedures
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria39
Complex planning-related issues, technical problems, conflicting ownership interests
and, in many cases, long project impleme ntation periods, cou pled with long term
aftercare costs can constitute a risk for the viability of many brownfield projects.These risks often translate into uncertainty over the costs of the project. A significantaspect of risk arises from the adequacy of data, and its interpretation, in respect of
ground conditions and the e xtent of contaminated areas.
In terms of viability , the most significant shortcoming seems to be a lack of inter-
disciplinary collaboration (e.g. Flanders /Finl and). Many of the pr ojects analysed are
carried out without a complete calculation of the overall profitability and without
integrated project control. The consequences are non-viable projects, or a too heavy
reliance on public money from Government or EU funding.
Valuation methods (determining the value of land) are mostly subject to national
regulations and / or professional judgement. In general, they do not necessarily con-
sider any problems specifica lly related to derelict land, for example the existence of
non-reusable buildings or soil contamination. The consequence of this is that owner
perception of value, fed by expert opinion, often determines a very high land value
that can be unrealistic in the light of re habilitation costs. Re development therefore
often proves to be unprofitab le. Specific methods have b een developed for valuation
of areas from the iron, steel and coal in dustries in Lorraine, France. Guidelines on
valuation of land which aim to make clea r whether contamination has been allowed
for, have been produced in the UK.
7.4 Legal Frameworks
In Europe over the last 10 years, considera ble efforts have been undertaken to solve
environmental problems aris ing from contaminated sites. Legal frameworks have
been developed, along with high scientific and technological standards. However,
the task of revitalising brownfield sites, including developing effective concepts to
bring the land back into ec onomic use still lies ahead.
In practice it is the existi ng Planning, Water and Environm ental Acts that provide the
legal framework for the management of ur ban brownfields. In many countries, most
of them focus on environmental aspects of contaminated land management and not
on brownfield redevelopment an d there is little em phasis on the need for an integra-
tion between the environmental, economic, financial and social measures. Brownfield
redevelopment however, requires an inte grated approach between planning, reuse
and clean up legislation. Against this ba ckground, many countries underlined the
need for more specific regulati ons for brownfield redevelopment.
The legal framework of the countries evaluated within CLARINET Working Group
„Brownfield Redevelopment“ is listed in table 3.

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria40
Table 3: Legal framework
Country Legal Framework concerni ng brownfield redevelopment
Austria • Building Permits, Industrial Code
• Water Act; Land development and zoning plans
Belgium/Flanders • Decree on unoccupied business accommodation
• Decree on Soil Remediation
Belgium/Walloon • Regional Planning Act and Building Code
Denmark • Act on Contaminated Soil
Finland • Environmental Damage Act, 1995
• Planning and Construction Act 2000
• Environmental Pr otection Act 2000
France • Law on environmental permits for industrial sites 1997
• Mining Code for former mines
• Civil Code
• Urban Planning Code for the redevelopment of brownfield
sites in an urban context
Germany • Federal Soil Protection Act 1999
• Regional Planning Acts
• Building Code
Greece • Environmental Protection Law
Ireland • Planning and Development Acts 1963 to 2000
• Waste Management Act 1996
• Water Pollution Acts 1977 and 1990
• Building Control Act 1990
• Derelict sites Act 1990
Italy • General law for remediation of contaminated sites, Waste
Act 1997
• National contaminated site s remediation plan, Law 426/1998
• Technical regulation for remediation of contaminated sites,
Env. Min. Decree 471/1999
• Urban redevelopment programs , Law 493/1993, Min. De-
cree 1/12/1994, Min. Decree 21/12/1994

Brownfield Redevelopment in Practice / Project Procedures
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria41
Table 3: Legal framework (continued)
Country Legal Framework concerni ng brownfield redevelopment
Netherlands • Urban and Rural Regeneration Act 1985, The Soil Protection
Act 1987 extended with a soil clean up paragraph in 1994
• Housing law
• Spatial Planning Act
• Environmental Protection Act
Norway • Pollution Control Act, Plan and Building Act
Portugal • Soil Act,
• No special legal regulations concerning brownfield redevel-
opment
Spain • Law of waste ”Ley de Res iduos” and ”Ley 10/1998, de 21 de
abril, de residuos”
• Specific laws for the regions Galacia and Catalunya
• Special regulations to soil quali ty issued in an Order by An-
dalusian regions
Sweden • No special legal regulations concerning brownfield redevel-
opment
United Kingdom • Town and Country Planning Act 1990 with additional
building regulations
• Environmental Protection Act 1990; Water Resources Act
1991; Environment Act 1995

8 DEFICITS AND RESEARCH NEEDS
The general context of brownfield redevelopm ent in the EU is set out in the previous
chapters. This context is complex in terms of triggering environmental, economic,
social, spatial planning and legal effects. As a result, the scope of recommendations
ranges from recommendations for politicians and regulators to recommendations forresearch and development tasks. In additio n, in view of the complex context in an
area of policy development, continuous evaluation and assessment of the necessary
administrative structures to provide the framework for action on brownfield sites is
highly recommended.
Research and development needs in the field of brownfield redevelopment must be
particularly designed to support the decision making process of the stakeholders in-
volved in the process, including municipa lities. R&D on brownfields requires much
more integration of disciplines wo rking towards the same objective.
CLARINET Working Group „Brownfield Rede velopment“ identified the main defi-
cits and research needs on the basis of the strengths and weaknesses of national ap-
proaches and project examples. The ai m of the CLARINET brownfield Working
Group was to analyse the subject in as much depth as possible, but inevitably this
analysis can not be more than a snapshot of the situation in the member states. For
the derivation of the recommendations it was important to find consensus about a
common interest across the EU avoiding the domination of potent ially only national
interests. Evaluation considers policy an d programmes, future use and planning pro-
cedures, site preparatio n and technical procedures and economic viability.
Furthermore, as part of the discussion process, the Working Group „Brownfield Re-
development“ identified some more issues that cannot simply be assigned to one of
the above areas, some of which were not specifically derived from the project exam-ples examined. They are summarised separately as other relevant and potential top-
ics of interest for the European Commission, to be tackled under their research pro-
grammes.
8.1 Policy and programmes
A specific overall deficit in achieving br ownfield regeneration is the lack of co-
ordination across existing pr ogrammes. European, national and regional policies and
programmes are lacking both co-ordinatio n between each other and, within each
programme, full integration of the economic, environmen tal and social implications
of brownfield redevelopment. This deficit underlines the need for more integrated
approaches and more co-ordin ation as a general task for future action on brownfield
redevelopment. Most stakeholders also su pport a need for more comprehensive un-
derstanding. The need for this on the urba n and regional level was advocated in dis-
cussions about structural fund reform and the formulation of an EU urban develop-
ment policy (EXPERT GROUP, 2000).

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria44
European Community research is one option to provide a scientific basis for testing
the success of such integrated project approaches in brownfield regeneration. Key
areas for policy in vestigations are:
• National framework analysis
• Brownfield prevention policies
• Derelict land listings, and
• Strategic land management
National framework analysis
As described in chapter 7, the conditions for brownfield redevelopment show signifi-
cant disparities between national ba ckgrounds. This applies equally to the
stakeholders involved, the planning and legal conditions and the project funding
systems and priorities. With regard to ongoing economic integration in Europe, theaim should be to achieve more coherence of brownfield redevelopment strategies.
National programme analyses in chapter 6 and project requirements in terms of be-
ing flexible and integrative – see chapter 7 – show the need for more regional ratherthan national approaches.
European Community research could assist policy and programme development by
comparative analyses and me asures to develop and exchan ge innovative policy ap-
proaches.
The main topics in terms of potential R&D projects to be investigated as part of na-
tional framewor k analyses are:
• Criteria for policy approaches to reduce the number of brownfields in Europe,
• Tools and methodologies to supervise this process, and
• Indicators and monitoring tools for the allocation of effective funding.
Ongoing discussions about regular measurement of sustainability using indicators
point out the appropriateness of the development of benchmark indicators for
brownfield redevelopment. Regular measur ement of such indicators assist policy
making on the national and regional level. Indicators to be investigated for their ap-
propriateness, particularly in terms of the availability of background data, are:
• ha/ annum for development for each country or region, normalised by population
density;
• costs/ ha for different categories of brownfield remediation including indicators
for brownfield land restored for environmental benefit;
• use of brownfield for development: ha/ annum / million population.
Further research efforts should also be put on the use of public funding, taking into
account the specific requirem ents of private land-owners. Issues that merit further
research include:
• Development of tools for th e handling of betterment on project costs and profits;

Deficits and Research Needs
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria45
• Development of criteria for the establishm ent and the role of intermediary organi-
sations during revitalisation;
• Development of criteria and priorities for project funding.
A specific new area to be investigated is the transfer of European funding instru-
ments to the Central European accession ca ndidates. Preliminary studies should pre-
dict the quantitative and qua litative dimension of the w ider issues and thus provide
criteria for the intervention of structural funds.
Brownfield prevention policies
The avoidance of the creation of new brownfield sites is a key political issue con-
nected with land management. Manufacturing and production cycles are becomingincreasingly rapid with an escalating need for flexibility. This requires the develop-
ment of strategies and “early warning systems” to avoid future derelict land. The
Working Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ concluded that a combination of in-
centives and penaltie s would stimulate effective la nd recycling and reduce new
brownfield creation. The Integrated Pollution Prevention & Control legislation (IPPC
Directive) partly addresses brownfield prev ention by placing an obligation on in-
dustry to restore land to the condition pr ior to the regulated use (see chapter 6.2).
Key questions for related research projects are:
• Is it possible to avoid future brownfields by reforming the legal / planning sys-
tem?
• Should legal instruments be co mbined with fiscal instruments?
• Should these instruments be subject of a European, national or regional initiative?
Research addressing these questions can be combined or incorporated in the analysis
of national frameworks. The essent ial issues for in vestigation are:
• existing and new legal inst ruments such as an obligation to reclaim areas (for the
landowner or manufacturer) after factory closure (along the lines of mining lawregulations or the Walloon planning law);
• the obligation to release land after activity closure in the condition it was before;
• fiscal means such as a specific levy on unused land;
• planning and architectural measures such as flexible design for new commercial
buildings.
Derelict land listings
Inventories of derelict land can be used as a tool to support both planning activities
and marketing of the site. The lack of integrated data sets about brownfields is onesignificant obstacle for rede velopment. Environmental regulators as a rule collect
data about the environmental situation. Land planning authorities generally do not
fully consider the envi ronmental condition.

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria46
As shown in the national overviews, dere lict land and unused urban areas are, if
registered, presently managed at different administrative levels, including environ-
mental authorities, economic development authorities, and planning offices. Due to
their individual sectorial perspectives, no ne of these regimes can provide a wholly
effective planning and decisi on-making basis for brownf ield redevelopment. Based
on the registers that are available, the development of regional brownfield registers is
proposed in order to record constraints and development potent ial in a systematic
way.
Future work in this area could focus on the shape and content of inventory sheets,
electronic masks, criteria for the recordin g of brownfields and methods of collecting
and maintaining data for practical applicatio n by local authorities and project devel-
opers.
Key issues for possible projects are:
• What data are needed for which purpose?
• Data availability and scope of action for their collection?
• Technical issues for the registration (computing)
• Responsible authority for registration?
• Cooperation between authorities
• Maintenance of the databases?
Strategic land management
The need for strategic land management in urban and regional planning has been
highlighted recently by the expert group on the Urban Environment, for DG Envi-ronment of the European Commission. As a conclusion from programme and project
analyses in chapters 6 and 7 it can be stated that best results were achieved in tradi-
tional industrial regions. One main reason for the success of projects in such regions,
for example Lorraine/Franc e and Northrhine-Westphalia/Germany, was their inte-
gration in an overall an d strategic land management policy, including
• Ownership issues;
• Concepts for the marketing of former industrial urban areas;
• Control of land use (urban development planning etc.);
• Land use regulations (purchase, appropriat ion, the right of first refusal for munici-
palities);
• Interactions with the property market.
Justification of future action in this field is based on recognition that current urban
and regional planning structures in Euro pean countries have been developed and
established in periods of general prosperity together with some focus on the devel-
opment of new land (greenfields). Dea ling with urban brownfields, however, re-
quires integration and flexibility in planni ng and land management. For the consid-

Deficits and Research Needs
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria47
eration of brownfield issues in strategic land management decisions it is essential to
define the scope and dimension of strategic issues for the regions involved.
Key areas to be researched are:
• Definition of strategic land management in a regional context,
• Development of indicators to identify the need for strategic land management,
• Development of criteria for the integrat ion of brownfield policies and programmes
in an overall regional land management,
• Evaluation of existing models,
• Identification of the rules for interactions between the property markets and public
management systems (Success consists of inter-linked activities on all administra-
tive levels, resulting in a more dynami c character for the property market, par-
ticularly in metropolitan areas),
• Criteria for the establishment of regionalised management structures,
• Investigation of potential impacts of property fund mo dels in structurally weak
areas with inactive private property markets.
8.2 Future use and planning procedures
The core element of successful regeneration of brownfield sites is the identification of
the appropriate after use. This is, as already mentioned, a component both of strate-gic planning and detailed planning for an indiv idual site. Key issues identified by the
Working Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ are:
• Practices for the early identification of the characteristics of the site and the way in
which these can be best integrat ed into spatial planning decisions,
• Ways of improving community participation in brownfield redevelopment, par-
ticularly for example in relation to risk communication,
• Development of methods and skills to respon d to the increasing importance of pre-
serving the industrial herita ge in brownf ield projects.
More specifically the Workin g Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ studied effects
and benefits of brownfield redevelopment for urban planning issues on the basis of
planning systems and project examples in the member countries (see chapters 6 and
7).
Clearly, in most European urban areas br ownfields are a relatively new problem for
urban planning. Most planning systems and regulations focus fr om their derivation
and philosophy on the management of green field development under the precondition
of economic growth. As already mentioned, brownfield redevelopment in urban areas
needs active interventions and initiatives wi th a high degree of flexibility in the proc-
ess. Key questions to be addressed in the near future are:
• Are existing urban planning procedures adaptable to inner city redevelopment
policies?

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria48
• Integration of demands and proposals for brownfield redevelopment in urban
planning procedures , e.g. flexibility and mixed uses?
• How could the involvement of all re levant stakeholders be organised?
• Is it possible by urban planning to raise private funding on brownfields?
In consequence CLARINET Working Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ con-
cluded on the need for more proactive co-ordination between remediation, planning
and redevelopment strategies. A modernis ed urban planning framework should link
all these aspects. Recomme ndations for further rese arch initiatives include:
• Development of practical tools to supervise and control dereliction in urban devel-
opment processes;
• Investigation and doc umentation of current practice in brownfield land reuse, in
the context of regulatory and planning procedures, in order to learn from each
other and to develop more dynamic and fl exible project deve lopment, approaches
and procedures;
• Investigation and structuring of the profiles and interest s of relevant stakeholder
groups in order to generate a common purpose for interaction on brownfield de-velopments,
• Investigation of mechanism to influence the property market and public funding to
attract financial resources to brownfields reuse;
• Investigation into the phenomena of temporary use and under-use of brownfield
sites in order to define life cycles of buildings.
8.3 Site preparation and technical procedures
The technical solutions to the problems of land contamination ha ve been developing
rapidly over the last 10 or more years. From the perspective of brownfield applica-
tion, there is now a clear opportunity to provide greater access to information on
these solutions to achieve more impact in this wider area. Technical approaches in
some specific areas can be critical to su ccessful management of land contamination
during brownfield redevelopment. In partic ular the need to ensure protection of the
environment and to minimise the use of reso urces can be identifie d during the initial
site preparation phase.
Improved co-ordination of sectorial research and increased transparency of the re-
sults achieved are a gene ral recommendation of the Working Group „Brownfield
Redevelopment“. The Workin g Group „Brownfield Redevelopment“ further recom-
mends the stimulation of guidance, new techniques and further assessment of policy
and practice in the following areas:
• The management of redundant buildings and infrastructures
• Demolition and recycling
• Contamination management

Deficits and Research Needs
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria49
Redundant buildings and infrastructures
A common feature of brownfield sites is th e presence of redundant buildings. These
structures represent many ty pes of buildings and former industrial facilities. The tra-
ditional approach of project promoters has demanded that the conditions on brown-
field sites are close to that expected on a greenfield site, in order to provide total
flexibility. This approach can be extremely wasteful of resource s but has clear bene-
fits, particularly where the infrastructure has been in place for many years and can-
not comply with present day standards. In many brownfield reclamation concepts
complete highway layouts, utility service networks and drainage systems are de-stroyed and replaced by new infrastructure. In the worst case, this may include thedisposal of the materials arising from infr astructure removal and the use of primary
raw materials to construct replacements.
Further research is recommended to:
• Develop rational criteria for decision making on the fate of these residual struc-
tures. Identification and appraisal of a ll relevant factors influencing the primary
decision of whether to retain or demolish the structure;
• Investigate norms and standa rds at the European level such as building and fire
regulations. (These are often based on th e construction of new buildings, not con-
sidering the existing constraints posed by brownfield conversions);
• Investigate criteria to balance between co nservation of buildin gs under safety as-
pects;
• Examine safety aspects in relation to cont aminated materials in existing buildings
e.g. asbestos;
• Development of criteria as to whether redundant site infrastructures should be
adopted, modified or removed.
Key questions for potential research projec ts particularly related to the legal frame-
work are:
• Do current regulations present significan t obstacles for the re use of buildings and
infrastructures on brownfields?
• Which are the main requirements of current regulations that hamper reuse?
• Are there legal and technical options to overcome such obstacles?
• Where are the main risks in case of not complying with current regulations?
Demolition and Recycling
Brownfield redevelopment offers the opportunity to adopt sustainable methods of
resource management. Demolition requires the controlled ident ification and segre-
gation of materials used in the original construction. Recently, the UK has developed
characterisation methods which assist in the selection of recycling processes andwhich enable optimal reuse applications for recycled materials – either individually,
in combination, or after treatment. The results of these projects demonstrate that re-
cycled materials can be successfully reus ed in brownfield rede velopment projects.

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria50
Such materials include the use of ash and cr ushed material as road base for new in-
frastructure. As outlined in chapter 7.2 there are already some practical experiences
on the demolition of existing buildings on brownfield sites.
Nevertheless, the Working Group „Brownfi eld Redevelopment“ identified a lack of
guidance and criteria for th e selection and assessment of available techniques. Of
particular concern were uncertainties relate d to suitable reuse options for demolition
material and economic concerns regarding the benefits related to the use of raw ma-terial. The Working Group „Brownfield Re development“ concluded that research,
including market studies, and identification and dissemination of good practice in
the following fields can provide guidance an d substantially assist in stimulating the
development of new technologies:
• harmonised approaches for th e use of recycled materials in public or private con-
struction projects;
• methods to avoid the spread of contamination during the demolition process;
• financial and regulatory measures adopted by EU member states for recycling and
the use of primary raw material s in brownfield redevelopment.
• approaches for the creation and maintenance of demand for recycled materials in-
cluding technical measures to optimise the economic value of recycled materials;
• innovation in recycling processe s and related technical concepts;
• handling of recycling materials on small sites;
• demolition techniques – in particular the sorting and grading of materials.
Contamination management
In most cases, contamination management is an integral part of brownfield projects.
It interlinks with liability issues of potential investors and sets the general framework
for a spectrum of reuse options at the brownfield site. Appropriate contamination
management in a cost effective manner, ther efore, is an essential element that also
determines the marketing potential of a site. The risk based land management ap-proach that has been developed by the CLARINET project provides valuable assis-
tance to combine the demands for reuse with those for risk management.
One particular factor is that in many ca ses the redevelopment of brownfield sites is
not straightforward because of high cost estimates for expected remediation re-quirements. As outlined in chapter 7 it frequently ha ppens that projects are in
“waiting” positions due to high costs or uncertainties in costs. The realisation of
many projects is, as already mentioned, dependent on the availability of funding.
Reliable models for cost estimation for remediation would provide fundamental as-
sistance for better management of the redevelopment scheme, reducing unexpected
cost variations which will help to keep the proj ect in progress.
The Working Group „Brownfield Redevelopm ent“ also concluded that integrated
practical guidance and improved technical standards on contaminated soil manage-
ment would help to transfer tools and expe rience to the brownfield sector. Addition-
ally, the following activi ties would provide valuab le background knowledge:

Deficits and Research Needs
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria51
• technical and economic reviews of decont amination and site rehabilitation tech-
nologies;
• databases on case histories of risk assessment and remediation strategies;
• database on re-use schemes of deco ntaminated soil and raw materials.
• Regarding research and development, key needs for contamination management
in the context of brownfield rede velopment are th e provision of:
• Tools and guidance to harmonise site management from a planner’s viewpoint
with environmental risk management.
Tools and guidance to reduce uncertainty an d to facilitate cost es timates for redevel-
opment projects, for example better sam pling and analysis procedures and protocols.
Tools and guidance for the re-use of decontaminated materials focussing on
(groundwater) vulnerability and target aspects.
8.4 Economic viability
The cost of dealing with contamination and other legacies, together with the wider
context of the economic development that relates to brownfield sites, mean that theviability of site and regional projects can be a critical factor. Public funding is often
needed to stimulate the inve stment in brownfield areas.
Planning-related issues, technical problems , conflicting ownership interests and often
long project implementation periods, constitute a risk for the viability of manybrownfield projects. Managing these risks often depend upon defining the exact costs
of the project. As outlined in chapter 7.3 uncertai nties with regard to the assessment
of the underground conditions and contaminated areas constitute a significant finan-
cial risk. In terms of viability, the most significant shortcoming seems to be a lack of
inter-disciplinary collaboration (e.g. Flanders /Finland). Many of the projects ana-
lysed are carried out without calculation of the overall profitability and without inte-grated project control. Often funding opportunities could not be used because of theintegrated needs of brownfield projects in combining infrastructural, urban and envi-
ronmental works.
The Working Group „Brownfield Redevelo pment“ identified key areas where new
tools might assist in enhancing viability:
Development of specific valuation methods to determine the value of derelict land
Methods to determine the value of land are the subject of national regulations and
professional judgements. In general they do not consider any pr oblems specifically
related to derelict land, for example the ex istence of non-reusab le buildings or soil
contamination. The consequenc e of this is that expert opinion often determines a
very high land value which is unrealistic in the light of reha bilitation co sts, and
therefore unprofitable for project developers. Specific methods for valuation of
brownfields have been developed in the UK and in Lorraine. Future activities should
concentrate on the development of new evaluation methods for brownfields based

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria52
on existing experiences, particularly in the UK and in France. Evaluation protocols
could ensure that all relevant factors are accounted for. Such protocols should seek to
be accredited by national and/or professi onal bodies to ensure that they are recog-
nised by all parties.
Insurance models for brownfield projects
The far-reaching economic dimension of the brownfield subject is closely connected
with a number of financial and liability risks raising the question about insurance
involvement. Liabilities and possible future obligations for the land owner are a ma-
jor obstacle to brownfield in vestment. Appropriate products of insurance companies
can contribute to minimise risks and stimulate investments to brownfields. There aresome products from insurance companies on the market but these are only randomly
used. The Working Group „Brownfield Rede velopment“ stated that these products
are not yet fully appropriate to meet the specific needs of br ownfield redevelopment.
The Working Group „Brownfield Redevelopm ent“ concluded that, based on US and
UK models, future research projects shou ld investigate new in surance models. Spe-
cific research is particularly needed in defi ning criteria on the definition of the insur-
ance rates depending on th e specific risk situation.
Key questions are:
• What is the definition or “risk” in th e context or brownfield redevelopment proj-
ects?
• How could risks been evaluated and monetarised?
Cost structures
The lack of satisfactory cost reference systems for brownfield redevelopment is a sig-
nificant gap for the evaluation of the economic viability. Better information on realcosts and better techniques for determining costs and benefits, such as a methodol-
ogy specifically adapted to the problems involved in brownfield redevelopment,
could clarify cost transparency and cost security on a European level.
The key question for research activities in this issue is whether it is possible to define
cost structures for brownfield projects similar to those used in the construction in-
dustry. Standardised cost catalogues and indicators would be an appropriate tool for
early viability considerations and could also be used as a tool for the control of public
funding systems.
Tools for Project Management
The achievement of cost-effe ctive and low-risk brownfie ld redevelopment is the re-
sponsibility of the project manager. Many project management approaches for
brownfields do not consider th e complexities and interactio ns of all the parties in-
volved in such processes. There is a specific demand for specialised tools and meth-odologies to manage brownfield projects. For example the development of specificcontract forms and guidance on different options for risk sharing for reclamation /
redevelopment would be a beneficial tool for the management of brownfield projects.
European research and other initiatives ca n support the development of tools, meth-

Deficits and Research Needs
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria53
odologies and skills for proj ect management. Analysis of existing approaches can
provide guidance regarding cost effectiven ess and time management of redevelop-
ment projects. It would help to identify gaps and provide assistance for the definition
of quality standards for this issue.
The Working Group „Brownfield Redevelopm ent“ has agreed upon a Checklist on
Land Recycling that is attached as annex 2 to this report. This checklist provides an
example for such a management tool for the comprehensive analysis of land recy-cling projects. By a pplying the checklist, the user becomes more aware of the com-
plexity of such projects and obtains an overview of all relevant issues.
8.5 Other relevant topics for future action
Brownfield redevelopment is a complex issue. The process of brownfield reclamation
impacts on a wide number of other topics. Its urban planning dimension means thatthere are of course close linkages to architecture and urban design questions. Manybrownfield sites include old industrial buildings, which require maintenance under the
special aspect of preserving the cultural heritage. Also the social environment of the site
is affected. On one hand, citizens are frequently concerned about the inconvenience ofthe redevelopment work as such, but on the other hand, after successful revitalisation,
the location benefits from an improved appearance and better social aspects.
CLARINET Working Group „Brownfield Rede velopment“ discussed these cross cut-
ting issues and identified a number of suggestions for future research on an interna-tional level. However, CLARINET is a ne twork of mainly environmental experts and
was not necessarily in a position to reach firm conclusions on the R&D needs in these
related areas. Nevertheless, to document the full content of the Working Group„Brownfield Redevelopment“’s work the essential issues are outlined below.
Urban and architectural design
Successful project practice shows that the planning process should encourage the adop-
tion of a level of urban design practice compatible with the aim of producing a higherquality urban environment. In pursuit of this , creativity in urban, architectural and land-
scape design is a key issue for the redevelopment of brownfield sites. Nevertheless, due
to the critical constraints and potentials of inner city locations, architects and plannersneed to be specifically qualified in dealing with the complexity of these problems. The
objective should be the wider application of best practice experience. Promotion of inte-
grated planning and design practice and the transformation of existing planning tools,
by for example architectural competitions, would be enhanced by the establishment ofquality standards for sustainability criteria, both within the planning process and within
professional qualifications. In the last decade many cities have made significant efforts in
revitalisation of former industrial, military or railway land. Quality criteria could beidentified by analysing classic project examples of specific aspects of brownfield rede-velopment via a comparative desk study.

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria54
The following research topics are suggested:
• Investigation of environmen tal aspects in brownfield redevelopment (saving en-
ergy and water, recycling of building mate rials, integration of green spaces in
earthworks, density of bu ildings…) as basis for common European evaluation
methodologies;
• Investigation of time-dimensions for the longer term urban redevelopment process
in order to develop early warning sy stems for future brownfield creation;
• Life cycle assessment of buildings for redevelopment;
Conservation of heritage and culture aspects
The listing of the Völklinger Hütte/ Saarland as part of the UNESCO world cultural
heritage in 1994 showed that many buildings constitute valuable cultural heri-
tage(see chapter 7.1). As has been demonstrated by nume rous individual projects in
Europe, brownfield redevelopment can go fa r beyond the purely conservation as-
pects: It can become the nucleus for economic activities in the field of culture. Newly
established businesses and innovation centres from the media sector, designers andartists as well as cultural initiatives appe ar to favour the use of abandoned industrial
facilities. It would be worthwhile to investigate if the conservation of industrial
heritage buildings can be developed as a dr iving force for the revitalisation of brown-
fields
The following research topics are suggested:
• To investigate phenomena on the conservation of heritage and cultural aspects and
the associated secondary effects on urban development and employment within
the socio-economic research programmes of the EU;
• The development of tools for the classification and maintenance of architectural
heritage of industry as major element of adding value to urba n surroundings(e. g.
International Building Exhibition – Emscher Park).
Social aspects
Socio-economic research activity in the area of brownfields includes the immediate
social effects of structural changes, effe cts from the redevelopment process and par-
ticipation issues of the public as part of the redevelopment process. Socio-economicresearch activities on such issues have been undertak en since the mid 1970’s. It is
recommended to support further resear ch and development activities in:
• Investigation of the long-term effects of economic restructurin g in traditional in-
dustrial regions. This includes the analysis of demographic factors and social mod-
els for the conversion of former indust rial complexes e.g. for the application in
Eastern Europe, in relation to strategies of brownfield rede velopment projects;
• Incorporating citizen participation to ad just common principle s and identify inno-
vative practices that can improve the quality of projects in brownfield areas, andthe efficiency of urban governance;
• Improving communication of risks and acceptance criteria for rehabilitation
schemes.

9 REFERENCES
ALKER (2000): “The Definition of Brownfield” in Journa l of Environmental Planning
and Management 43(1), 2000.
BARDOS, P. (1998): International networ ks for contaminated land. Nottingham.
(9/98)
BELLOTTI R. & GARIO G. (ed.) (1991): Il governo delle trasformazioni urbane: analisi e
strumenti , Angeli, Milano.
BÖRNER, S.; PATERNOGA, W. & FERBER, U. (2000): Financing an d organisation of
brownfield recycling – development of a strategy for Saxony; In: ContaminatedSoil 2000, Leipzig
BUNDESMINISTERIUM FÜR UMWELT, JU GEND UND FAMILIE (1999): 10 Jahre
Altlastensanierungsgesetz und Bayrisch-Ö sterreicher Altlaste ntag, In: Schriften-
reihe des BMUJF Bd. 29, Wien.
CARACAS (1999): Risk Assessme nt for Contaminated Site s in Europe, Volume 1 –
Scientific Basis, Volume 2 Policy Frameworks, Nottingham.
CIRIA (1997): “Remedial Treatment for Cont aminated Land, volume XII: Policy and
Legislation”, Construction Industry Research and Information Association Spe-cial Publication 112, London 1997
COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES; Association Des Eu-
ropéennes De Technologie Industrielle – R.E.T.I. (1992) : Etude Des Problèmes
Poses Par Les Sites Abandonnes Et Pollues Des Industries Charbonnières EtSidérurgiques.
CIOCCHETTI A.; CASER M. & PERLETTI M. (1998): L’indagine sulle zone urbane di
trasformazione e sulle aree da trasformare per servizi , Atti e rassegna tecnica della
Società degli ingegneri ed architetti di torino,2.
DANSERO E. (1993): Dentro ai vuoti. Dismissione indu striale e trasformazioni urbane a
Torino , Collana di studi e ricerche del D ipartimento Interateneo Territorio del
Politecnico – università di To rino, Cortina Edit ore, Torino.
DENNER J. & LOWE M. (1999): “Effective Re generation of Brow nfield Land in the
United Kingdom”, paper presented at seminar on brownfield regeneration,
Duisberg Germany, 1999.
Department of Environment, Transport and the Region s (DETR) (2000a): “DETR An-
nual Report 2000”, the Statio nery Office, London, 2000
Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (2000b): “Planning
Policy Guidance Note 3: Housing”, Th e Stationery O ffice, London 2000
Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (2000c): “DETR Cir-
cular 2/2000: Contaminated Land”, Th e Stationery O ffice, London 2000

CLARINET – Brownfield Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria56
Department of Environmen t (DOE) (1995): “Su rvey of Derelict Land in England,
1993”, HMSO, London, 1995
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA ) (1999): A Sustainable Brownfields Model
Framework
Establishment Public Foncier de la Metropôle Lorrain e (EPML) (1996) : Histoire
d´une mutation, Pont á Mousson
Establishment Public Foncier de la Metropôle Lorraine (EPML) (1996) : La Re-
conquête des Friches Industrielles, Metz
EAUE – European Academy of the Urban environmen t (1995): Redevelopment of
derelict Land in Europe, Berlin
EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY (1995): Study on derelict industrial
sites of the coal and steel industry.
EEA – EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENC Y (2000): Management of contami-
nated sites in Western Europe, Copenhagen
EUROPEAN UNION: (1998): Sustainable Ur ban Development in the European Un-
ion: A Framework fo r Action (COM(98)605),
EXPERT GROUP ON THE URBAN ENVIRON MENT (2000): Toward s more sustain-
able urban land use: Advice To The European Commission For Policy And Ac-
tion.
FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE:http://www.vyh.fi/eng/fei/fei.html,
http://www.vyh.fi/eng/landuse/
FERBER, U. (1995): Aufbereitung und Revita lisierung industrieller Brachflächen in
den traditionellen Industrieregionen Europas – Sonderprogramme im Ver-
gleich, Darmstadt.
KOMMISSION DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEIN SCHAFTEN – Generaldirektion Re-
gionalpolitik (1991): EUROPA 2000 – Pe rspektiven der künftigen Raumordnung
der Gemeinschaft, Brüssel, Luxemburg.
Landesentwicklungsgesellsch aft LEG Nordrhein-Westfalen (1999): Rechenschaftsbe-
richt, Düsseldorf
MILLER J. & RASUMNY C. (1992) : La réno vation des sites d’activité économique
désaffectés: critères de sal ubrité des sols et problème s de contamination à pren-
dre en compte en vue réam énagement des sites. Report for the Walloon Region.
MINISTRY OF HOUSING, SPATIAL PL ANNING AND ENVIRONMENT (1998):
National environmental Policy Plan 3.
OECD (1998): Urban Brownf ields, http://www1.oecd.or g/tds/bis/brownfields.htm
OVAM (1999): Overzicht betreffende de ui tvoering van het bodemsaneringsdecreet
in Vlaanderen

References
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria57
RICHARDS, I.G.; PALMER, J.P. & BARRATT, P.A. (1993): The reclamation of former
coal mines and steelworks, Amsterdam.
RUTGERS, M.; FABER, J.H.; POSTMA, J.F. & EIJSACKERS, H. (2000): Site-specific
ecological risks: A basic approach to the function-specific assessment of soilpollution, Waginingen.
SECCHI, B. (1990): Aree industriali dismesse; il progetto Bi cocca e altri progetti analighi in
Europa , in Commissione delle Comunità Europee, Libro verde sull’ambiente ur-
bano. Lussemburgo.
SIEVERTS,T. (Hrsg.) (1991): IBA Emscher Pa rk – Zukunftswerkst att für Industriere-
gionen, Köln
UMWELTBUNDESAMT (2000): Ha ndlungsempfehlungen für ein effektives Flächen
Recycling, Berlin.
Urban brownfields (1998): Rest ructuring and urban econom ic development, Utrecht,
Urban Mines (2000): National Brownfield Sites Project,
http://www.urbanmines.org.uk/brown.htm.
UTF (1999’): “Towards an Urban Renaissance – final report of the Urban Task Force”,
E & FN Spon, London 1999.
VATTER, K (1995): Reactivation of unused commercial, in dustrial or infrastructure
sites in Vienna
Welsh Development Agency (WDA) (1994): Ma nual on the Remediation of Contami-
nated Land, Cardiff

ANNEX 1
Country specific Information

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria60
Content
PREFACE ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……..61
AUSTRIA………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……..62
BELGIUM, FLANDERS………………………………………………………………………………………….65BELGIUM, WALLOON ………………………………………………………………………………………….69
DENMARK ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ….72
FINLAND ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …….74
FRANCE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………78
GERMANY………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …..81
GREECE …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………85
IRELAND………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……..88
ITALY ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. …………90
THE NETHERLANDS…………………………………………………………………………………………….94NORWAY …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ……96
PORTUGAL ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ….97
SPAIN………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ……….102
UNITED KINGDOM ……………………………………………………………………………………………107

Country specific Information – Preface
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria61
PREFACE
This annex is a compendium of country spec ific information that has been compiled
during the continuance of the CLARINET project by the Working Group on
“Brownfields Redevelopment”. Between th e meetings, the membe rs of the working
group reviewed country sp ecific documents and cons ulted additional national
experts to accumulate national background information about brownfields. They arestructured along the topics:
• Extent /localisation / types,
• Policy /programs / actors,
• Legal regulations, and
• Gaps and obstacles.
This information has been the principal ba sis for working group discussions and the
analyses of national approaches concerning brownfield redevelopment. Extrainformation for the derivation of recommendations were in some cases obtainedfrom additional sources and literature reviews.
There has been no external examination in terms of auditing the country information
for consistency. The informat ion purely reflect the essent ial issues as they are seen
and identified by the country represen tatives from a national perspective.
Contact persons and relevant literature are listed at the end of each country profile.

AUSTRIA
Extent / localisation / types
Brownfields in Austria are located in the traditional industrial regions often linked
with infrastructural dereliction in the metropolis of Vienna. So far, there is no knownreliable national data on the extent of brownfields in Austria. Soil loss due to soil
sealing is assumed to be some 20 ha/day or 7 – 12 m
2 /person/day. Between 1991
and 1991 increase of total amount of buildin g area has been 30% on average – up to
50% in western part s of the country.
Projects targeting a systemat ic identification of potentia lly contaminat ed industrial
sites revealed that on average 2% to 4% of the industrial sites are abandoned and
cover about 2% of urban areas.
Policy / programmes / actors
To date no governmental programmes su pporting brownfield redevelopment exist at
a national level. Policy makers and the au thorities are becoming increasingly aware
of the extensive use of greenfield and the existence of derelict land with a potential
risk to human health. Therefore, there is an increased interest in their re-use and
redevelopment. Issues related to the re-use of abandoned industri al sites are mostly
dealt with by local authorities. However, within these authorities competencies fordealing with brownfield-problems are not clearly structured. Due to the lack of
general regulations, decisions are made on a case by case basis.
Specific local programmes have been init iated by the City of Vienna. Since the
development of peripheral urban deve lopment zones needs both time and
substantial financial means, the use of existi ng unused spaces is given priority. These
urban areas are often partially equipped with infrastructure. The capitalisation of the
land can support many of the companies in their restructuring activities, and theiruse makes no inroads into existing green spaces.
In order to exploit those sites in important areas for town planning, the City of
Vienna uses two funds:
• the Vienna Business Promotion Fund (WWFF) for industrial and commercial
spaces;
• the Vienna Land Provision and Urban Renewal Fund (WBSF) for housing space.
The funds are involved in the purchase, div ision and provision of sites, with tasks
not strictly differentiated between the two funds. Their activities also include thedistribution of subsidies. Co-operation between urban planners, the funds and the
developers run smoothly, although decision-making is not always easy. There are
several examples of targeted developmen t of unused commercial, industrial or

Country specific Information – Austria
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria63
infrastructural sites in Vienna. They differ widely in size, planning and
implementation.
Legal regulations
There is no specific legislation directly assigned to brownfield redevelopment. The
following legislation has an influence on handling the problem:
• Building permits
• Aspects of brownfield redevelopment are also considered when granting building
permits for any kind of construction.
• Industrial Code
• Among others, the Industrial Code includ es provisions for granting permissions
for the set up or closure of in dustrial or commercial facilities.
• Water Act; Austrian Standard fo r Risk Assessment for Groundwater
• As a consequence of the lack of regulations on soil protection guidelines or
regulations stipulating water quality (especially groundwater) are of utmostimportance for defining necessary remediation measures.
• Austrian Standard for Risk Assessment for Soil
• Austrian Standard for the use-depend ent assessment of soil contamination
• Land development and zoning plans
Dedication of ground for a sp ecific use – especially fo r industrial or commercial
interests – is allocated with respect to regional and supra-regional planning
instruments.
Gaps and obstacles
• lack of any specific regulation to handle the redevelopment of brownfields
• lack of regulations for soil quality with respect to specific land-use
• lack of or insufficient co-ordination for granting construction permits in the case
of a need for remediation
• the aspect of re-using land is not sufficiently considered in the granting of funds
for remediation
• better conditions prevail for in vestment in greenfield sites
• potential clean-up risks for investors in brownfields.

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria64
Further Information
KASAMAS Harald, Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und
Wasserwirtschaft, Stubenbaste i 5, 1010 Vienna, Austria, e-mail:
kasamas@bmlfuw.gv.at
SCHAMANN Martin, Umweltbundesamt, Spittelauer Laende 5, 1090 Vienna,
Austria; email: schamann@ubavie.gv.at
Literature
VATTER, K: Reactivation of unused commercia l, industrial or infrastructure sites in
Vienna, 1995

BELGIUM, FLANDERS
Extent / localisation / types
The actual number and size of brownfields in Flanders is not exactly known, but the
problem of brownfields in Flanders is as important as elsewhere. Brownfields are not
attractive for investors due to the high legal, environmental and financial risks. Theuse of ‘clean’ industrial land is ch eaper and easier. 4000 unoccupied business
accommodation sites are known, however not all of these are contaminated, and only
a part of these can be considered as brownfields.
Starting in 1981, the Public Waste Agency of Flande rs (OVAM), which is the
competent authority for soil remediation, began actions that resulted in the closure of
about 250 landfills. In the mid 1980s 10 large sites were selected for remediation. At
the beginning of the 1990s, OV AM started a comprehensiv e inventory of potentially
polluted sites. To date, about 6.500 former industrial and landfill sites are listed.
The soil remediation policy in Flanders is based on a tiered approach. The first step
was a preliminary investigat ion that gave a distinction between contaminated and
non-contaminated sites. From this comprehensive inventor y 970 sites. Nearly half of
these posed a risk (489 sites) and required further investigatio n. 223 sites have been
thoroughly investigated of which 94 sites presented a serious risk and remediation is
necessary. 60 remediation projects are already approved by OVAM.
10.000 reports on soil cont amination have been filed at OVAM to date, as a result of
the Soil Remediation Decree (22/2/95). In 40% of these cases contamination was
present and a 2 investigat ion was ordered. 1917 risk assessments have been
completed, resulting in 801 sites where a re mediation project is needed. In 446 cases,
a remediation plan has been introduced by OVAM (figures to the end of 1999).
The term brownfield is not defined in Flemis h legislation. Based upon the criteria as
used by the USEPA, about 30 sites can be considered as brownfield, the largest sites
of which are the former co al-mines. 1.600 ha of these areas have been assessed and
remediated between 1993 and 2.000, with spec ial employment measures established.
Policy / programmes / actors
OVAM, the Public Waste Agency of Flanders, is the responsible body for the
environmental aspects of brownfields. OVAM has a number of tasks concerning
waste management including prevention , recycling, imposing environmental
taxation, raising awareness etc.
Following the waste de cree (article 21/§2,c) and the amen dments to this article since
1990, OVAM can also act to enforce the elim ination of the waste from enterprises,
contaminated soils and disused industrial installations, if it presents a risk to the
public and environmental health. After a suit able procedure of declaration of default

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria66
conducted by OVAM or the Flemish Ministry, the party is declared in default where
they have omitted to undertake the measures imposed, or to carry-out the works
prescribed within the required period or time. In such a case, the work is prefinancedby OVAM from a special fund constituted on the basis of environmental taxation.Afterwards legal action is taken to recover the expenses from the liable party.
Apart from OVAM, local authorities (provincial governors and mayors) and the civil
protection administration also have the power to take remedial action in specific
cases of pollution. In certain other cases the courts may also impose action regardingsoil remediation.
Since a rising number of sites were known to present problems of soil and/or
groundwater contamination, an efficient and systematic approach was needed tocharacterise and eventually to clean-up such sites. The following phases were
considered in the action of OVAM following the Soil Remediation Decree:
• Addition to the inventory of p otentially contam inated sites,
• Preliminary investigation of all available information and limited field work to
rank the sites in an order of priority for further investigation,
• Descriptive soil study to circumscribe the extent of the problem and the risk to
public health and the environment,
• A soil remediation project to compare the clean-up alternatives and to select the
best option,
• Execution of the remediation project, followed by an aftercare phase.
Recent changes in the organisation of Town and Country Planning, have resulted in
a spatial planning system that covers the whole region of Flanders. Zones reserved
for industry, farmland, housing, etc., ar e well defined. This plan has resulted in
restricted areas for industrial purposes and has therefore stimulated the remediation
of contaminated sites.
A project is currently running (under the authority of OVAM) to develop a decision
support system for ‘Active So il Management’ integration as pects as well as skills for
project management. The aim is to generate advice for precautionary measures and
land use limitations based on risk assessment, allowing the adjustment of the use of
the site to the actual risks caused by so il pollution. As well as prohibiting certain
activities on the si te, the activities that are st ill possible without risks are also
indicated, along with measur es that can be undertaken to allow certain activities
pending remediation of the site.
The ministers competent fo r Environment, Economy and Urban planning, started in
2000 a strategic project on brownfield (re)development. The main goals of this
program are:
• the environmental improvement of the sites themselves;
• the reduction in ‘development pressure’ on greenfields;
• the economic and social regeneration of the surrounding areas.

Country specific Information – Belgium, Flanders
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria67
A task force is responsible for overseeing efforts to redevelop brownfields statewide.
The major responsibilities are to evalua te the legal framework and practical
procedures, and make recommendations on ways to better promote the brownfielddevelopment.
Legal regulation
In Flanders the following legislation relevant to brownfields is in force:
• The Decree on unoccupied business accommodation, which levies taxes on
unoccupied manufacturing space. In th e case where renovation (including
remediation) is planned, exemption is given from taxes for a maximum of 2 years.
• The Decree on Soil Remediation, aiming at co ntaminated sites, and clean up of all
historical contaminated sites before 2036 – in urgent cases before 2006.
According to the Decree on Soil Remediation contaminated land can only be
transferred after:
• A remediation plan has been handed in by OVAM (the Public Waste Agency of
Flanders),
• A financial guarantee is given to cover the costs of the remediation works,
• An obligation towards OVAM to remediate the site is made.
In specific circumstances, exemptions can be made by the Flemish government.
Gaps and obstacles
• Two years of exemption from taxes for site vacancy is usually too short to finish
the procedure of soil remediation following the Decree on Soil Remediation.
• Soil remediation is a complex issue an d a lot of industries, citizens and
stakeholders need more in formation and support to deal with it. Better and
quicker decisions can be made if communication is optimised.
• A specialised institute for brownfield development does not exist at present. This
means that the different parties (owners of polluted sites, investors, remediation
firms, governmental agencies) can not collaborate easily.
• Brownfield development is also a br oader issue than remediation of a
contaminated site and cu rrently there is not much expertise in this matter.
Actions are taken on different levels, but there is seldom an integrated approach.
• The Soil Remediation Decree has had an impo rtant impact on the transfer of land
and the control of industrial facilities. Still, abandone d sites seem to escape this
legal system because there is no exploit ation or sale. Due to soil pollution, these
sites often remain disused or under-used and no action related to the above
mentioned legislatio n will be taken in the near future.

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria68
Further Information
WILLE Eddy; OVAM; Kan. de Deckerstraat 22-26; 2800 Mechelen; Belgium; e-mail :
ewille@ovam.be
http://www.brownfields.be (in preparation)
Literature
OVAM: Overzicht betreffende de uitvoering van het bodemsaneringsdecreet in
Vlaanderen, 1999
VAN DYCK, E. & WILLE , E. 2000: – Revalorisati on of inactive industrial land. The
case of Flanders, Belgium. Naturopa nr. 94, 2000

BELGIUM, WALLOON
Extent / localisation / types
The Wallonia region is one of the industrial regions in continental Europe. There are
approximately 9,000 hectares of derelict industrial land, over half of which consists offormer coalfields. Specific legislation has existed since 1978 to facilitate the reclamation
of contaminated land for new uses. During the mid-1980s attention was paid to the
significant issue of contamination, and an extensive programme of investigation and
policy initiatives to identify and remediate sites emerged. The 1978 legislation forces
the owners of a derelict site to renovate th eir properties and contains obligations for
rehabilitation. However its essential goal is th e improvement of the visual aspect of the
site coupled with the reintegration of the rehabilitated site into the economic cycle.
Environmental impacts have only been subject to legislation since 1993. A PlanningAct also enabled sites to be reclaimed in such a way that they could be assigned a new
use, economic or otherwise. At this time a complete inventory of derelict sites on the
Walloon territory leading to a priority classifi cation (based on historical data and
actual state of the site), was conducted. Of 2,000 recorded sites:
5 % were classified with real risks (RR level) ;
42 % with potential risks (RP level) ;
48 % with likely to be minimum risks (0R level) ;5 % where more information is needed (Undefined).
Policy / programmes / actors
The risk of contamination on urban and industrial derelict land raised little attention
in Wallonia until the mid-1980s. Since then public concern – and governmental care –
have been rapidly growing since both parties discove red that, considering the
importance of the industrial past of the Region, this was really a major issue at a
regional level. A twofold strategy was initiated:
• Firstly, a public body was created to reclaim polluted sites: SPAQUE (Société
publique d’aide à la qualité de l’envi ronnement), whose main mission assesses,
prioritises and reclaims former waste disposal areas. SPAQUE is now in charge of
17 “priority sites”, 4 of whic h are undergoing reclamation.
• Secondly, the experience acquired in other regions with similar industrial
traditions has pointed to the number of problems posed by production sites. This
equals, and in some instances, is more serious than those generated by wastedisposal areas. Therefore the Walloon Region launched a special research
programme focusing on the risk of cont amination from former industrial sites.
To assist rehabilitatio n of sites, the Walloon Region pr ovides assistance in the form of
subsidies and loans. If the site operator is a local authority or pub lic operator, this aid
will cover 50 % of the purchase cost and th e whole of the costs incurred in cleaning

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria70
and remediation, excluding the cost of an y new structural wo rk. Where a private
operator is involved, loans are provided where the Region pays part of the interest.
At the time the Act of 1978 wa s constructed, there was no requirement to investigate
or control the risk of soil contamination. However, in the following decade, the
problems encountered in German, Dutch an d British industrial areas induced the
Walloon Government to add this new concern to its derelict land policy.
Legal regulation
In 1993, because of a highly contaminated si te, the authorities were faced with the
new problem of pollution potentially genera ted by industrial activity. The Regional
Development Administration decided to entrust ISSeP (reference laboratory) with a
preliminary environmental analysis based on soil controls and a complete historical
study performed by GEHAT (Brussels University). This regional programme nowconsiders about 35 derelict sites per year. A commission regrouping the relatedAdministration (Regional Development, Environment), ISSeP, GEHAT and invited
site owners to discuss the preliminary results and judge the future actions needed for
each site i.e. further investig ations, remediation and future use.
The Walloon Government is currently re viewing specific regulations on soil
contamination and brow nfield strategy will be the subjec t of a particular chapter of
any revision.
The legal regulation for brownfield redevelo pment only concerns visual aspects and
reintegration of the site into the economic cycle, and does not concern any
environmental issues. At the moment, this is only covered by the "goodwill" of the
related Administrations (e.g. Regional development and Environment) who considerthe soil pollution impact. The Regional Planning Act and Building Code (CWATUP)
is relevant for brownfield redevelopment an d contains obligations for rehabilitation
but does not define standards for risk assessment and clean-up. These last points are
actually involved in the review. Other regulations are related to waste, which meansthat each brownfield site could become or be considered as a landfill as polluted soil
is considered a waste. This le gislation is not adapted to this subject but can be used if
necessary to solve difficult cases.
Gaps and obstacles
The main difficulties are:
• A practical difficulty in accurately and ex haustively reconstructing the industrial
history of a given site and in localisin g risk areas with sufficient precision,
• A difficulty of methodological nature in discriminating between situations which
present a real risk in the long term, from those where the contamination burden
will, in time, be limited by natural attenuation processes,

Country specific Information – Belgium, Walloon
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria71
• The management of the “post-closure period”
• In terms of contamination risk, the most critical period in the life of a site, is the
period from the closure of the industrial operation, to the time when it is decided
to remediate or re-use the site,
• Two types of problems are encountered during this period:
• Those associated with negligence, following the progressive and then total
discontinuation of the site, in particular the cessation of internal and external
controls and maintenance,
• Those arising from inappropriate zeal in the initial work carried out during
the general clearing of the site.
• Economic limitations on a decontamination project
Given the present-day level of knowledg e and existing practice in respect of
decontamination, it appears that the techniqu es most commonly implemented
remain extremely costly. As regards the financial support of Walloon Region, there isno doubt that only sites or partial sites with a high social or economic value could bedecontaminated in the short term.
In the medium term it is hoped that less expensive remediation technologies,
currently at the experiment al stage, will become more generally used and more
effective. In a few years such develo pments should permit a more thoroughly
remediation of sites which are maintained until that time in a state of passive safety.
Depending on the individual circumstances, it will be possible for sites of this kind to
be cleared immediately of any buildings and then planted or landscaped, in order to
eliminate the visual b light they represent.
The major obstacle encountered in brownf ield redevelopment is clearly the absence
of legal regulation related to soil pollution and risk assessment.
Literature
NOTE: Act of 27 June 1978 concerning th e reclamation of abandoned Walloon
business sites, incorporated within the Walloon Town and Country PlanningCode (Arts, 79 to 93 and 333 to 344). Duly amended in April 1995

DENMARK
Extent / localisation / types
In Denmark, traditional industrial location s are typically located close to harbours in
the major cities. Denmark has no legal de finition of brownfields and no specific
regulation directed towards this issue. Thus, no estimates of the number and extentof brownfields have been conducted.
Policy / programmes / actors
No specific programmes support the re development of brownfield in Denmark.
Existing programmes for the renewal of towns do not regulate the use ofcontaminated areas in the cities, but aim at improving the quality of the existingcities. Remediation of contamination is not a goal of the programme but an element
of this is often included in order to fulfil the main objective, th at is city development.
Spatial planning establishes a framework for land use and the construction of
buildings, roads and other infrastructure, in cluding the way in which existing urban
features and landscapes can best be protected. Tasks related to environmental
protection are increasingly integrated in the work of spatial planning. Spatial
planning in Denmark is carried out at th ree levels: local and municipal planning in
the municipalities, regional planning in the counties and national planning co-
ordinated by the Ministry of Environment and Energy.
The Spatial Planning Department prepares a national planning report after each
national election. These reports describe the vision of the Danish Governmentregarding national planning policies and are supported by de monstration projects
intended to inspire new solutions and innovative co-operation schemes.
The Minister of Housing and Urban Affairs appointed in June 1999 the Industrial and
Urban Committee. The Commi ttee finished its work in May 2001. The committee
recommend a number of new initiatives and acts that can strengthen development of
sustainable cities in relation to localisat ion and land-use and su ggests that there are
made legal basis for creating companies for development of cities taking specifically
care where barriers of development e.g. contamination exist. In The Danish
Governments national strategy for a sustainable development, June 2001 the
committee’s idea is supported.
Specific programs for protecting and improving the urban environment
The urban environment and urban developmen t is an important focus of the Spatial
Planning Department. They participate in European co-operation to promote
sustainable urban development. For example, working to reduce the environmental
burden of transport through urban and transport planning.

Country specific Information – Denmark
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria73
There are no specific proced ures for including contaminat ed land treatment in city
development activities. The Act on Soil Contamination gives the municipalities a
possibility of financial support for the reme diation of sites that are not included in
the county plans for remediation. This can be linked with city development activities,but has only recently b een used in practice.
The counties are the authorities responsible for the public funding of remediation
according to the Soil Contamination Act. They cannot, however, fund urbandevelopment projects, as remediation of co ntamination can only be financed if it
constitutes a risk to groundwater that is al ready reserved or used for drinking water
purposes, or the contamination constitutes a risk to the present land use (i.e. housing,
children institutions and pu blic playgrounds). The coun ties pay the total cost of
remediation. The municipalities do not have any budget to finance remediation of
contaminated sites. In 1999 the counties total budget for the investigation and
remediation of contaminated sites amounted to 235 million DKr.
In practice many projects have been carried out without public funding chiefly at
attractive areas located in the bigger cities.
Legal regulation
On January 1 2000 the new So il Contamination Act came into force, and forms the
legal basis for regulation of contaminated sites. Brownfields are covered by this Act.
This Act makes it possible for municipa lities to contribute to investigation and
remediation of contaminated sites. Th is is expected to further improve the
possibilities for the remediation of brownfields.
Brownfields are consequently included in the counties’ mapping programmes. If a
private landowner wishes to develop a cont aminated site (i.e. a brownfield), the
county must approve the project in relation to the remediation of contamination
before the project can be initiated.
In Denmark valuable experience with this system has been gained and many
contaminated sites have been cleaned up by private owners wishing to make use ofsites attractively situated within the cities.
Gaps and obstacles
In Denmark it is observed that in period s of prosperity, brownfield redevelopment
works very well, whereas when trade is declining brownfield redevelopment is very
limited.
Literature
PACTE PROJECT (1997): Environmental Effects of structural change in old industrial
cities. Tampere

FINLAND
Extent / localisation / types
The history and structure of industrial de velopment in Finland is different compared
to many other European countries. The indu stry is relative ne w (mostly developed
after the second world war) and industrial locations are quite small and individually
situated around Finland (e.g. paper and pulp, wood processing, mining and metal,
machine and textile industries). There ar e not many brownfields compared to many
other European countries and there is also not a very big pressure for brownfieldredevelopment. One reason fo r this is that usually ther e is adequate greenfield land
in Finland.
The first investigations of hazardous waste landfills star ted in the early 1980s and the
systematic restoration of contaminated sites began in the mid 1980s. Between 1989
and 1993 the SAMASE project was conducted. Some 10 000 sites suspected of being
contaminated were mapped. Their actual environmental and health impacts are
being investigated. In Finland no comprehensive research about the number ofcontaminated industrial sites in inner cities has been conducted. An updating of the
original survey of contaminated sites is bein g made this year and it is estimated that
2001 about 20 000 sites are suspected to be contaminated in Finland.
Policy / programmes / actors
There is no policy strategy specifically concerning brownfield redevelopment in
Finland. Policies on urban
renewal are integrated into the
general planning policy.
The new planning system ( Land
Use and Building Act) came into
force on 1st January 2000 and
has three levels of land useplan: the regional land use plan ,
the local master plan and the local
detailed plan . In addition the
Government defines national
land use goals , which apply to
regional structure, quality of
the living environment,infrastructure, ecologicalsustainability and natural and
cultural heritage of national
importance.

Country specific Information – Finland
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria75
The regional land use plan transfers national and regional land use goals to land use
planning at the local authority level. Th e plan ensures appropriate regional and
community structures, preserves ecological sustainability and provides the properoperating conditions for business and indu stry. The plan is compiled by a regional
council (alliance of municipalities), which is made up of local authorities and
confirmed by the Ministry of the Environment.
Within local authorities the local master plan is an instrument for guiding and co-
ordinating land use at a general level. It is used to ensure the functionality and
economics of the community structure, the accessibility of services, the preservation
of natural and cultural values, the quali ty of living environment and the reduction of
environmental hazards. After the plan is constructed, consultations have to be held
with the Regional Environment Centre, whic h ensures that national goals are taken
into account.
Local detailed plans , such as town plans are used fo r regulating building and formation
of the physical townscape.
According to suggested national land use goals it is necessary to determine that the
land is suitable (no risk to human he alth) for the planned land use. Planned
remediation of suspected contamination also needs to satisfy the planned land use.Present land use and operational needs to reduce possible health impacts are also
assessed.
The Finnish Ministry of the Environment is responsible for the general development
of land use planning. The main aims of the new act in relation to urban developmentand brownfields are to create a sust ainable basis for the development of
communities, to improve public participation in area development and to delegate
more decision-making to local authorities.
Responsibility of clean up
The Ministry of the Environment is the national authority on environmental affairs,
but the Regional Environment Centres make decisions about the individual clean-upprojects and set the conditions for the clean-up measures. The polluter has the
liability for the remediation in principle and in legislation. In practise, however, the
polluter is often resourceless, bankrupt or out of reach. Thus the owner of the realestate has the environmental liability, but often the requirement to restore the sitewould be unreasonable. In cases where the primary liable party cannot be found, the
municipality has the secondary respon sibility for risk and remediation.
Even though the majority of remediation work has been financed with private funds,
1/3 of projects are financed by the public sector. Annually government funds used
for clean-up projects have been at the le vel of 6 million Euro and the municipal funds
8 million Euro, a total of 14 million Euro. For th e restoration of contaminated soils the
annual total expenditure is 34 million Euro . To date more than 600 contaminated
sites have been remediated.

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria76
Research and development projects
The main purpose of the national SAMASE project was research and development,
developing soil guidelines and quantifyin g the problems pose d by contaminated
sites. It included an estimation of clea n-up costs for priority sites. New waste
legislation was drafted simultaneously and the findings of the project were directly
applied. In August 1998, the Working Grou p for Soil Protection gave a report:
Objectives in Soil Protection (The Finnish Enviro nment 248). This deals with
objectives and the current situation for soil protection in Finland, and gives
guidelines for future measures. This includes the implementation of therecommendations of the Council of Europe, to prevent contamination, to establishthe remediation need of sites and to clea n them up by the year 2015. The importance
of prevention and remediation of contaminated sites was acknowledged by this
report.
The Finnish Council of State issued a Deci sion-in-Principle on the Water Protection
Targets to 2005 on 19 March 1998 (The Finnish Environment 226). The main goals of
the Decision-in-Principle are the reduction and prevention of eutrophication. In
addition those contaminated sites which present a risk to water protection, will be
studied and redeveloped on a case by case basis.
Legal regulations
In Finland there are no specific legal regulations for brownfield redevelopment.
Issues raised by this subject are addressed within the new Environmental Protection
Act (in force since 1st March 2000).
In the new Environmental Pr otection Act soil and groundwater polluting activities are
prohibited, or the soil or groundwater must be returned to its original state so it can
be used for any desired purpose. The Act al so contains regulations for the clean up of
soils.
The Environmental Damage Act (in force since 1995) applies to new environmental
damage. Other regulations (such as the Damage Compensation Act) are applied to
those environmental damages that are excluded by the Environmental Damage Act.
The applicable law defines the severity of liability and the conditions for sufficientproof. In this respect th e Environmental Damage Act applies strict liability on
entrepreneurs. Expanded liability for damages has made it easier for the
environmental authorities to recover damage prevention or clean-up costs from theresponsible party.
The 1990s saw proposals by committees and working groups for secondary
compensation for environmental damage in cluding old contaminated sites. As a
result of these proposals a new law came into force in 1998, however it was limited to
new incidents. By law the compensation of new environmental damages is funded
by charges levied on firms using dangerous chemicals and the restoration of old
abandoned sites is funded from the state budget.

Country specific Information – Finland
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria77
The liability questions for remediation issues are complicated, because the legal base
is broad and the liable party is often hard to trace. These reasons delay the carrying
out of remediation projects.
Gaps and obstacles
• It is not always self-evident as to the correct remediation method. In Finland there
are no general criteria fo r objectives for redevelopm ent or for acceptable risk
evaluation concerning an in dividual contaminated site.
• Planning and construction decisions are not made by environmental authorities,
but by other municipal authorities, that do not have expert knowledge about the
redevelopment of contaminated sites.
• Redevelopment is a rather complicated i ssue at the administrative level. The
procedure for granting a permit is slow and complicated and the content of the
authority’s decision might be unexpected. These facts cause obstacles and
hindrances to the realisation of remediation projects. There is a lack of qualified
consultants for remediation projects and the quality assurance is ofteninsufficient. The situatio n is now improving rapidly.
• Liability issues with respect to remediati on are still unclear. There have been
problems with re-utilisation and final dispo sal of decontaminated or treated soils,
because there has been a shortage of landfills to take the material.
• Development for creating new reception and treatment sites for contaminated soil
has been slow because the landowners have been uncertain about the scale of
activities that are required by soil clean-up projects. The landowners have also
been concerned about the extent to whic h it is profitable to invest in the
infrastructure required for this clean-up activity.
• In principle there is a general financia l system in Finland, which could grant
partial financial support to the polluters or the real estate owners for these clean-
up projects. However, this is not used, due to a lack of money. The active financesystem supports only the polluters and the real estate owners who are insolvent.
• If the prior use of the br ownfield areas could be more rigorously evaluated, it
would make it possible to choose the most cost-effective remediation method.
Unfortunately, the history of the areas has not always been fully examined, and
this sometimes leads to remediation me thods with unnecessarily high costs.
Further Information
http://www.vyh.fi/eng/fei/fei.html
http://www.vyh.fi/eng/landuse/

FRANCE
Extent / localisation / types
France considers that brownfields are di fferent from contaminated sites. The
definition of brownfield site is: “space prev iously been developed (agricultural, port,
industrial, service, processing, military de fence, storage or transport); that are
temporarily or definitively abandoned following the cessation of activity; and they
need to be reclaimed for a future use. They can be partially occupied, derelict, or
contaminated.
Brownfield sites are of considerable interest in some former industrial French regions
since the 1970s (in particular, Lorraine and No rd – Pas de Calais), and more recently
in other regions because of extensive urba n development (Paris and Île de France,
Rhône–Alpes). Most of the available information on brownfields management(regional procedure, location of brownfields, regional database, examples of sites
reclamation, etc.) is provided by the regional authorities.
Different questions have been addressed, related to inventories of brownfield sites,
suitability of sites for future use (when sites are not considered as contaminated) orsite reclamation according to the regions’ situation (cf. next chapter). In the first
approximation, brownfields include ab out 200.000 former industrial and service
sites, and about 200 former mi nes. The stock of industrial brownfields is estimated at
about 20,000 ha. This is concentr ated as expected in the tr aditional industrial areas of
the northern and eastern part of the country, especially in the region of Nord-Pas de
Calais (9.400 ha) and Lothringen (2.500 ha). Most of these are large sites (more than
10 ha) in suburban or periurban locations. The stock of brownfields has notdecreased in the last decade despite of considerable recl amation activities.
Policy / programmes / actors
In France long-term policies and programmes exist in the traditional industrial
regions piloted by Lorraine. Since the 1980s , and in the context of the national
“contact de plan” – funded by the state, region and the EU -, specific brownfield
reclamation programmes have been develope d. It was important to create a new
economic foundation and modernise urban and infrastructure structures, which had
been exclusively geared to the former indu strial use. Altogether, 3.350 ha of derelict
industrial land had to be treated between 1987 and 1998. Due to the regional
dominance of derelict land, a joint intervent ion of national, regional, and local actors
was necessary. As it was clear from the beginning that it would not be possible to
immediately find new uses, the strategy de veloped in 1986 concentrated on the rapid
improvement of the ecological situation through large-scale landscape treatment.Preparation of the land for new uses, whic h involves much higher costs, will be a

Country specific Information – France
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria79
medium and long-term task. Therefore, all efforts were focussed on overcoming the
negative image caused by derelict land. The programme priorities were based on:
• the first, and simple priority of rapid identification of derelict land;
• the establishment of a regional development agency;
• a clear and comprehensive methodol ogy – „requalification sommaire“;
• adequate and regular funding;
• a partnership of all parties involved;
• support for the preparation and deve lopment of derelict land for the
implementation of leading projects with regard to the development of theagglomeration.
Ordinary "re-qualification" (" requalification sommaire" ) is clearly preferred if any
after-use project could be defined. The derelict land strategy known as "Remise en
état" contains:
• demolition as well as clea ring work in the area;
• construction of terraces and planting , enclosing or the planting of screening trees
• construction of recreational paths;
• where necessary, treatment of contamination using all legal instruments to make
the polluter pay.
Subsequently, the properties are to be ma naged on a regional level and in individual
cases left to the free property market. The executive body of this part of the
programmes is the regional development agency, the "Establis hment Public Foncier
de la Metropôle Lorraine" EPML, 1996). EPML had b een entrusted with the
realisation of this strategy. Since 1970 EPML, which has been created by the central
state in order to implement land policies with local authorities, has been undertaking
planning and developing tasks.
Due to financial support by the state, the re gional council, the agency itself and the
European Fund for regional development, it was possible to mobilise a total of 120
million /G189/G3/G69/G72/G87/G90/G72/G72/G81/G3/G20/G28/G27/G25/G3/G68/G81/G71/G3/G20/G28/G28/G26/G15/G3/G76/G81/G3/G82/G85/G71/G72/G85/G3/G87/G82/G3/G76/G80/G83/G79/G72/G80/G72/G81/G87/G3/G87/G75/G72/G3/G81/G72/G90/G3/G71/G72/G85/G72/G79/G76/G70/G87/G3/G79/G68/G81/G71/G3/G83/G82/G79/G76/G70/G92/G17
By 1997, 3.350 ha of derelict land had been treated.. Two thirds of the money came
from the Lorraine Region, the French State and the EPML. One third came from theEU. All in all, 97 locations in 109 communit ies were treated. Since treatment, 30 % of
the sites have been re-used for economic purpos es, 22 % remain available, 17 % used
for parks, 27 % designated for nature and 4 % developed for housing. Thanks to the
strong position of EPML, the industrial land owners were persuaded to sell their
property at favourable prices. At the same time, partial sales of attractive and
unencumbered properties directl y by the owner was prevented.
The strategy chosen was exemplary as it succeeded in linking the interests of the
private property owners, the community and other actors in the framework for a co-ordinated regional master strategy. The regional stakeholders are co-operating in a
common network with research activities and international services.

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria80
Legal regulations
No special legal regulations for brownfie ld redevelopment exist in France. Legal
aspects will be covered by:
• Law on environmental permits for industrial sites,
• Mining Code, for the former mines (Code recently modified to take into account
the cessation and the abandonment of mine sites),
• Civil Code (liability on harm caused by owned properties),
• Urban Planning Code for the redevelopm ent of brownfield sites, in the urban
context,
• Some specific regulations on historical building prese rvation and requalification.
Gaps and obstacles
• Definition of liabilities related to soil co ntamination with respect to the difference
between the impact on the environment or health and the re-use of a site.
• Current land planning tools that do not take into account soil contamination
(inducing breakdown of reclamation works when pollution is suspected or
established).
Further Information
PAQUOT Alexandre, Ministre de l’Enviro nment, 20 Avenue de Segur, 75302 Paris 07
SP, France, e-mail: alexandr e.paquot@environnement.gouv.fr

GERMANY
Extent / localisation / types
In Germany, there is an increasing awareness about the wider brownfields issues.
These are frequently discuss ed as an essential element of contaminated land
management. In the last 10 years considerable efforts have been made to solve theenvironmental problems arisin g from contaminated sites and a high scientific and
technological standard has been achieved in this field. However, the task of
revitalising derelict land and of developing effective concepts for bringing the land
back into economic use still is a primary task for the futur e. Presently th ere are about
362.000 suspected contaminated sites nation -wide. The total resource of brownfields
is projected to be 128,000 hectar es across the country. Th e presence of brownfields
hamper the economic development in the affected regions as its negative appearanceand the risks associated with the enviro nmental hazards are major obstacles for
investment. However, at the same time land consumption is increasing and is
presently at a rate of 129 hect ares per day. This area of land is sealed every day for
building purposes. This indicat es that there is competit ion between greenfields and
brownfields with respect to attraction of investors for the development of land.
Policy / programmes / actors
In 1998, the Federal Ministry for the Envi ronment in Germany published the Draft
Environmental Programme and set the following objectiv es for brownfield
redevelopment:
• rehabilitation of industrial sites and elimination of hazards to human beings and
the environment;
• reintegration of rehabilitated sites into the economic cycle;
• reduction of land consumption from 120 hectares per day (status 1998) to 30
hectares per day by 2020.
Various development agencies have develope d regional brownfield initiatives in the
Federal states, for example the ”Lande sentwicklungsgesellschaft Nordrhein-
Westfalen” (LEG,1999). By establishing a Property Fund in 1982 the region has made
the redevelopment of brownfield sites an d disused buildings central to its policy of
creating an integrated urban development model. The activities of the Property Fundgo beyond the establishment of new attractive business parks. They include:
• the accumulation of wide experience in the economic framework and prudent
dealing with contaminated and derelict sites;
• placing quality targets in urban construction before purely economic
considerations, whether it is the arch itectural plans for the commercial building
itself, or surrounding landscaping and recreational areas and facilities;

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria82
• preserving industrial architecture wh ich had been abandoned and which bears
witness to the history of the industrialisation which was so important to this state;
• safeguarding monuments such as the co almine Zollverein XII in Essen or the
Landscape Park in North Duisburg, which are now becoming new tourist and
cultural attractions within the Ruhr area.
To date 2.400 hectares in 178 locations have been purchased. Of these, 971 hectares
have so far been rehabilitated, develo ped and placed on the market. 61% of the
developed business sites have b een sold. This is a significant success given that there
are many other sites available on market. A lot of hard work is currently being
undertaken on a further 514 hectares in order to place them on the market within
another two to three years. This applies particularly to the projects for the
International Building Exhibition (IBA) at Emscher Park. The exhibition was
completed in 1999. The IBA aimed to provide overall impulses for the ecological,
economic and social restructuratio n by providing new landscape schemes,
brownfield reconversion e.g. for technology centres and innovative housing schemes.
Since the reunification specific brownf ield problems emerged in the new German
states. High greenfield consumption with tax incentives met the decline of industry
and military conversion. The high stock of brownfields – e.g. 18.000 ha in Saxony
became a major handicap for the urban an d economic restruct uration. In 2001, the
State of Saxony started with a new integrated and interdepartmental brownfield
redevelopment program funded by the European Regional Development Fund
(ERDF) of the European Commission.
Legal regulations
There is no special legislation for brow nfield redevelopment in Germany. Legal
aspects are covered by the Federal Soil Conservation Act, by Regional Planning Acts
and by the Building Code. The Federal Soil Conservation Act came into force on 1st
March 1999 with requirements for contaminated land remediation in terms of
defining country wide standards for risk assessment and clean-up. The SoilProtection Act gives some guidance on th e provision of a clean-up plan and a
remediation contract. The Regional Pla nning Acts and the Building Code include
regulations for the unsealing of surfaces, for the restriction of greenfielddevelopment and define basic guidance for the careful handling of soil.
Gaps and obstacles
There are a number of deficits in practice:
• Location of business and industry on green field sites is easier, cheaper and faster
than on brownfield sites, thus more attractive to sti mulate investments
• High legal, environmental and financial risks for investors

Country specific Information – Germany
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria83
• Lack of integration of environmental and spatial planning policy and procedures
• Insufficient awareness of already available legal options to enhance the
redevelopment of brownfields sites
• No or poor incentives for invest ors, long term investment risk
• Negative appearance and environmental risks
Further Information
http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/altlast/web1/start.htm
Literature
Federal Environmental Agency/Umwel tbundesamt 1998: Revitalisierung von
Altstandorten versus Inanspruchnahme von Naturflächen – Gegenüberstellungder Flächenalternativen zur gewerb lichen Nutzung durch qualitative,
quantitative und monetäre Bewertung der gesellschaftlichen Potentiale und
Effekte, ARGE focon/WCI im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, Texte 15/98,
Berlin, Germany, 1998,http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/altl ast/web1/berichte/gwiese/gwiese.htm
Federal Environmental Agency/Umwelt bundesamt 1999: Praxis einführung der
Boden-Wert-Bilanz und Syst ematik zur Abschätzung des Brachflächenbestands
in Deutschland, UFOPLAN – FKZ : 298 77 284 Arbeitsgemeinschaft
focon/WCI/Prof. Burmeier Ingenieurgesellschaft
http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/altl ast/web1/berichte/gwiese2/wiese2.htm
Federal Environmental Agency/Umwelt bundesamt 1999: Handlungsempfehlungen
für ein effektives Flächenrecyclin g UFOPLAN – FKZ 203 40 827, DB AG,
Kompetenzzentrum Sanierungsmanagement GPE Gesellschaft für
Projektmanagement und Grundstücksentwicklung mbH unter Mitarbeit von:
Anwaltssoziätät Leinen und Derichs, EA Herdecke Ingenieurgesellschaft fürGeotechnik und Umwelt, Projektgruppe Stadt und Entwicklung, Leipzighttp://www.umweltbundesamt.de/altlast/web1/berichte/recycl/recycl.html
Federal Environmental Agency: Brownfields versus Greenfields – Economic and
Ecological Aspects of Land Developm ent options, Berlin, Germany, 1999
Federal Environmental Agency: The Land Value Balance – A local Authority
Decision Aid for Sustainable Land Management, Berlin, Germany, 2000
GRIMSKI, D.: The Land Value Balancing Sy stem – A Tool for Greenspace Protection,
Presentation at Brow nfields2000 Conference, 13.10.2000, Atlantic City, USA,
http://www.brownfields2000.org/proceedings/1-14g.pdf

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria84
GRIMSKI, D. % FERBER, U.: Strategic approach for sustainable land use –
Recommendations for action for an effective brownfield Redevelopment,
Contaminated Soil 2000 (2000) , Volume 2, S. 1358-1366
GRIMSKI, D.; DOETSCH, P. & RÜPKE, A .: Brownfields versus Greenfield sites
under economic and long term enviro nmental considerations, Contaminated
Soil ‘98 (1998), Volume 1, S. 651-660

GREECE
Extent / l ocalisation / types
In Greece there is no offici al or systematic collection of information and data on
contaminated land. Part of this inform ation is currently scattered among various
public and private organisa tions and establishments.
As far as brownfields are concerned, no sy stematic efforts have been undertaken to
quantify this problem, but, due to the lack of heavy industry, the extent of this
problem is limited. Areas of traditional indu stries in the sense of de-industrialization
are located in smaller pocket s. De-industrialization is a relatively recent phenomenon
in Greece. It came about from the late 1980s onwards with the closure of large
traditional industries (in sectors such as clothing, mineral extraction, shipbuilding
etc.) which were, for certain areas (urban an d rural) the main local employer. Due to
this decline, there are area s where unemployment levels locally have risen to 30% or
more. Such areas have been officially de signated as high unemployment areas and
get special assistance from the structural funds.
Industry is concentrated in the metropolitan areas of the country: (Athens-Attica
41.8% of industrial GDP, Thessaloniki 16.0% – 1994 figures).
Policy / programmes / actors
Brownfield redevelopment st rategies in Greece are today under development.
Although there is no national plan for brownfield redevelopment, there are relevant
programmes. These programmes are supported by the Ministry of Environment andconcern the area of Lavron in Attica, the “Thriassion Pedion” in Attica, and the
industrial area in the Assopos river valley (Viotia).
However, some basic principles are incl uded in the recent legislation (1997),
regarding the planning and the general gu idelines for solid wast e management. One
important issue in this legi slation is the registration and the gradual elimination of
sites contaminated due to waste disposal, through their reclamation and
rehabilitation.
The Regions (NUTS II authorities) undertak e the general urban planning, except for
urban planning in Athens and Thessaloniki, where the Ministry of Environment,
Physical Planning & Public Works are responsible. The Prefectures (NUTS III
authorities) are responsible for the approval of urban studies, in cooperation with the
local authorities (Municipa lities and Communities).
The evaluation of contaminated land in urban planning is not specified in national
legislation. However, they are specified in urban studies, as they are based on
scientific data and include environmenta l investigation as one of their main
parameters. Under the Joint Ministeria l Decision 69269/5387/1990 (”Classification of

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria86
activities into categories, content of Environmental Impact Studies (E.I.S.) etc.”), the
responsible authorities, that is the Ministry and other Ministries, the Regions and the
Prefectures (depending on the capacity and the kind of activity), examine for everyactivity all information related to physical and urban planning and land use in the
proposed (for a new activity) area of the acti vity. This examination occurs at the stage
of the decision making for the location of the activity and if contaminated land is a
factor, it is then taken into account.
In the national operational programe ”ENVIRONMENT” of the CSF (III,) the
proposed objectives included in the priority sector ”PHYSICAL & URBAN
PLANNING AND REGENERATION ACTION S” for the period 2000-2006, are as
follows:
• Decentralisation of im plemented plans, parallel to an upgrade of the role of the
center.
• Promotion of strategic physical planning.
• Completion of urban planning in the new spatial units.
• Improvement of the efficiency of the physical and urban planning.
• Upgrade of the metropolitan center of Athens, of the cities of Thessaloniki,
Piraeus and of other ur ban centers in Greece.
• Implementation of integrated actions for coastal zone protection in tourist areas.
• Implementation of the national policy fo r sustainable urban development of the
cities and settlements, in the framework of the countr y’s fulfillment of relevant
EU and national obligations (im plementation of Habitat II Agenda).
The European URBAN Initiative funds ur ban regeneration (including employment
creation) projects as well as operational programmes of the Community SupportFrameworks (CSF). The new CSF (III) incorporates a policy for urban centres andmost regional programmes include town-specific urban development sub-
programmes or measures.
Legal regulations
The most relevant legislatio n includes principally the Environmental Protection Law
1650/86 and two Joint Minist erial Decisions (J.M.D.):
• 69728/824/1996, regarding “measures an d provisions for solid waste
management”.
• 19396/1546/1997, regarding “Measures and pr ovisions for h azardous waste
management”.
Two other J.M.D’s. have been recently issued, following the provisions of J.M.D.
69728/824/1996, that is:
• 113944/17.11.97, regarding the “General guidelines for solid waste management
policy”.

Country specific Information – Greece
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria87
• 114218/17.11.97, regarding the “Framework of specifications and general
programmes for solid waste management”.
Moreover, in urban planning, the way that contaminated land should be taken into
account is not specified in national legisl ation. This is specif ied in urban studies,
since their specifications, based on scientific data, include environmental
investigations as one of the main para meters. The above le gislation does not
sufficiently cover the subject of brownfields and there is a need for development of
more specific legislation.
Gaps and obstacles
• Insufficient legislation and no specific policy on brownfield redevelopment.
• Environmental, financial and timing risks
• No specific advantages for investors with respect to economic aspects.
Further Information
LIAKOPOULOS Alexandros, Mesoghion Av enue 70, Institute für Geology and
Mineral Exploration, 11527 Athens, Gr eece, e-mail: envigme@otenet.gr
PAPASSIOPI Nimfodora, National Techni cal University of Athens, Zografos
Campus, 15780 Athens, Greece, e- mail: papasiop@metal.ntua.gr
VARELIDIS N., PrismaCentre for development studies, e-mail: Prisma@ath.forthnet.gr

IRELAND
Extent / localisation / types
To date no specific national survey has been conducted to identify and register
brownfields in Ireland. The Environmen tal Protection Agency (EPA) undertook a
preliminary desk-top assessment of sites th at were potentially contaminated. It has
estimated that there are somewhere be tween 1900 to 2,300 sites where historical or
current industrial activities may pose a ri sk to soil and groundwater. These activities
include old gaswork sites, wa ste disposal sites, closed mining sites, old fertiliser
plants, tanneries, timber treatment activiti es, petroleum depots and retail stations,
dockyards, scrap yards and agricultural activities such as sheep dipping and the use
of pesticides. Most of these sites are generally located in urban areas, around major
cities and towns particularly Dub lin and around the Cork region.
Policy / programmes / actors
Policy on the environment in Ireland is made by the Department of Environment and
Local Government (DELG), with the EPA offering technical advice on relevant
issues. Since 1986 the DELG has develope d and implemented an Urban Renewal
Scheme that provides for a planned, inte grated and focused approach to urban
renewal. The urban renewal scheme must address the physical, economical, social
and environmental regeneration and rejuvenation of urban areas. The scheme gives
financial incentives for de velopers to develop brownfield sites in urban areas.
Under the guidelines for the 1998 Urban Re newal Scheme loca l authorities are
responsible for the selection and prioritising of sites and key developments to be
included in Integrated Area Plans (IAP’s). In selection and prioritisation of sites, local
authorities must identify areas wher e there are substantive barriers to
redevelopment. Priority will be given to area s in cities and towns with strong urban
characteristics where the greatest concentrations of physical decay, social and
economic disadvantage occur.
Where a local authority design ates an area for inclusion in the scheme, this must be
justified on the basis that such financ ial incentives are required to overcome
identifiable, substantive barriers to develo pment. Contaminated sites constitute a
potential barrier to development.
More recently, the DELG have introduced the Town Renewal Scheme that came into
operation in 2000 and aims to revitalise smaller towns. This scheme is similar in nature
to the Urban Renewal Scheme and is rest ricted to towns with a total population
density of between 500 and 6,000 people per km². Local authorities are responsible forselection and preparation of Town Renewal Plans. The scheme gives financial taxincentives to develop brownfield sites in towns. Particular attention is directed at
measures to regenerate older industrial bui ldings, which have become under-utilised

Country specific Information – Ireland
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria89
or derelict. Designation and tax incentives ar e only justified where it can be shown that
they will assist in overcoming identi fiable barriers to the desired development.
Legal regulations
Ireland does not have legislation dealin g specifically with contaminated land.
However, existing legislat ion provides a considerable ra nge of powers for dealing
with brownfield site redevelopment. These include the EPA Act 1992, the Waste
Management Act 1996, Water Pollution Ac ts 1977-1990, Local Government Planning
and Development Acts 1963- 2000, Buildings Control Act, 1990 and Derelict Sites Act,
1990. These Acts and associated Regulations are used by both local government and
the EPA to control and encourage brownfield site redevelopment.
Depending on the size of a site, the types of contaminants present and the
remediation proposed, the developer of a brownfield site may require a WasteLicence from the Environmental Protection Agency or a Waste Permit from the LocalAuthorities. Large scale industrial activiti es are also licensed by the EPA, and where
historical contamination has been ident ified, the company may be required by
conditions attached to the Integrated Pollution Control Licence (IPC) to investigateand remediate the contamination.
Under the Planning Acts, local authorities can exercise some control in relation to
brownfield site redevelopment. Some of th e larger urban brownfield sites that are
currently under redevelopment in Ireland are being managed as a result of plans
specifically designed to encourage redeve lopment. Generally, land development acts
as a catalyst for brownfield site redeve lopment, particularly where the land in
question is of potential value from a development perspective.
Gaps and obstacles
Ireland has a relatively low population density in comparison to other European
countries. As a result the pressure to develop brownfield sites is also reduced.
However, the current economic boom has led to considerable development and
clean-up of several contaminated sites in urban areas such as Dublin and Cork. Thedevelopment of generic guideline values for priority contaminants in soil and
groundwater applicable to Ireland are curre ntly underway. These generic guideline
values will provide a useful tool to support the redevelopment of brownfield sites in
addition to the use of site specific risk assessment.

ITALY
Extent / localisation/ types
The redevelopment of brownf ields may affect several urban areas in the Italian
territory, with special regard to the north of the country. Regions with the highestnumber of brownfields are Lombardia, Piemonte and Veneto, due to the strongindustrial development of the northern regi ons in the past decades. In central and
southern Italy there are few large in dustrial plants because the industrial
development was focused in the past only in limited areas. Some of those old
industrial plants, such as o il plants, chemical plants, steel and iron industries, mining
sites, are undergoing total or partia l decommissioning and are characterised by
brownfield features since they are located next to urban areas and their rehabilitation
is strongly linked to social and economic issues. These sites, addressed by a special
legislation as contamin ated "sites of national interest" may have an area of some
hundreds of hectares and are often located close to the Mediterranean coast, at
Bagnoli (Naples), Crotone (Calabria), Brindisi and Taranto. Some areas within thelarge industrial poles are being cleaned up and rehabilitated, but their requalification
for a more sensible use, is not always feasible.
On the local scale, even though the Regi ons are still developing local inventories of
contaminated or potentially contaminated sites, it is possible to predict a quite
relevant number of brownfield sites altogether . Several industrial sites are located in
the proximity of, or within urban areas, and many of them have been abandoned
since the 1980s.As an example in the Prov ince of Milan about 150 old industrial
abandoned sites of different sizes have been counted, reaching up to an area of 1260
hectares.
Policy / programmes/ actors
No specific government pr ogramme for brownfield rede velopment is available in
Italy. The only national legal framework regarding this aspect is the National Decree
no. 22/1997 (Waste Act) and related imple mentation Decr ee no. 471/99 on the clean-
up of contaminated sites.
In addition, Law no. 426/98 established public funds for a number of selected sites
defined as “sites of national interest” that are relevant contaminated sites with
special features (e.g. loca tion, extension, heavy environmental contamination,
economic and social stresses, urgency of redevelopment) that locally might justify a
'brownfield' label; some examples of th ese are Porto Marghera (Venice) and some
subareas in the aforementioned Bagnoli, Crotone sites. The original list has beenexpanded by a recent (2001) decree and the number of "sites of national interest" isnow approximately 40.

Country specific Information – Italy
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria91
The initial public budget fo r rehabilitation of these sites is over 500 million Euro for
the next three years.
Local level activities
It is important to underline the increa se of local activities on brownfield
redevelopment and valorisation promoted by municipalities, local groups and
authorities. These actions affected mostly northern cities. The strong urban and
industrial development of th ese cities, such as Milan, suffered from an economic
crisis in the ’70s, ’80s and later, which was followed by the shut down of several
industrial plants. The abandonment of th ese industrial areas was not felt as an
environmental issue and urban passivity has predominated until recent times: only
in the last few years local government has started to take care of these areas by
means of clean up and redevelopment under land planning programmes.
The need for urban spaces, infrastructu res and the recent awareness of the
importance of quality of life in urban area s, has led to the development of integrated
policies and approaches aimed at the sust ainable management of these territories.
These approaches involve the private sector, communities and public authorities.
Some projects are co-financed by the European Commission e.g.:
• ’Urban Pilot projects’ (Mun icipalities of Genoa and Venice): financing specific
programmes of renewal of historical or traditional urban areas.
• ’Municipia’ (Municipalities of Terni and Tr ento): network of towns managing the
urban environment.
Most of the European funds dedicated to brownfield regeneration programmes arise
from the Structural Funds for old indu strial areas and underdeveloped areas,
according to the provisions and obje ctives of the funding initiatives.
Laws and decrees concerning urban regeneration were issued in 1993 and 1994 for
financing programs of redevelopment of urban areas carried out by private and
public subjects. As a consequence in 1997 five programmes for redevelopment of
urban areas (P.R.U.) were started in the municipality of Milan involving a total
surface of 160 hectares, previo usly occupied by br ownfields. Up to now a part of the
remediation works is achieved and the co nstruction of 4300 hous ing units, 4 urban
parks, commercial and productive areas is currently in pr ogress. About 700.000 Euro
were invested, mainly by private companies.
Legal regulations
No specific regulatory framework addresses the complex issue of brownfield
redevelopment, besides the legislation an d funds generally rele vant to contaminated
site rehabilitation.

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria92
Gaps and obstacles
There are a number of deficits in practice:
• The absence of specific redevelopment programmes,
• Insufficient technical, legal, liability and administrative references,
• Insufficient participation of the public community,
• No uniform supporting programmes,
• No advantages for investors with regard to economic aspects,
• Location of business and industry on green field sites is easier, cheaper and faster
than on brownfield sites,
• Negative appearance and environmental risks are the major obstacle to
investment in brownfield rehabilitat ion and are a barrier to their re-use.
Further Information
ENI ’Enrico Mattei’ Foundation (www.feem.it)
Liguria Region (www.regione.liguria.it)Municipia Associatio n (www.municipia.org)
International Council for ’Local Environment Initiative’ (www.iclei.org)
Literature
BELLOTTI, R. & GARIO, G. (ed.) 1991: Il gover no delle trasformazioni urbane: analisi
e strumenti, Angeli, Milano.
BARBIERI, C. A.; GAMBINO, R.; GARELLI, M. & SACCOMANI, S. 1989: Progettare
la città e il territorio. Una rassegna critica di 100 progetti per Torino e il
Piemonte, Rosemberg & Sellier Torino.
BREGLIA, M. (ed.) 1995: Rapporto aree indust riali dismesse in Sc enari immobiliari n.
21, Milano.
CAMPEOL, G. 1994: La pianificazione nelle aree ad alto rischio ambientale, Angeli
Milano.
CIOCCHETTI, A.; CASER, M. & PERLETTI, M. 1998: L’indagine sulle zone urbane di
trasformazione e sulle aree da trasformare per servizi , Atti e rassegna tecnica
della Società degli ingegner i ed architetti di torino,2.
CRESME 1999: L’Italia da recuperare, indagine sul processo di recupero
riqualificazione e trasfo rmazione in sedici grandi città italiane, Credito
Fondiario, Roma.

Country specific Information – Italy
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria93
DANSERO, E. 1993: Dentro ai vuoti. Dismi ssione industriale e trasformazioni urbane
a Torino, Collana di studi e ricerche del Dipartimento Interateneo Territorio del
Politecnico – università di To rino, Cortina Edit ore, Torino.
DENTE, B. (ed.) 1990: Metropoli per proget ti. Attori e processi di trasformazione
urbana a Firenze, Torino e Milano, Il Mulino, Bologna.
FUBINI, A. & CORSICO, F. 1994: Aree metr opolitane in Italia, Angeli, Milano.
GOVERNA, F. 1997: Il milieu urbano. L’identit à territoriale nei processi di sviluppo,
Angeli, Milano.
MARCHESE, U. 1997: Aree metropolitane negli anni 90 EGIG Ge.
SECCHI, B. 1990: Aree industriali dismesse; il progetto Bicocca e altri progetti
analighi in Europa, in Commissione delle Comunità Europee, Libro verde
sull’ambiente urbano. Lussemburgo.

THE NETHERLANDS
Extent / localisation / types
Exact figures for the size of the brownfield problem are difficult to find as this is
highly dependent on the definition of brownfield. In a study commissioned by theMinistry of Economic affair s, between 9,000 and 11,000 hectares of industrial sites are
obsolete in the Netherlands. The problem is important in an urba n context, as every
large city with an industrial history has brownfield problems.
Policy / programmes / actors
Brownfields are legacies from an industri al past. Some forms of industry became
obsolete and the soil problems they crea ted remained unknown for many decades.
The discovery of the social and economic impact of dealing with soil pollution
became a barrier for the redevelopment of these brownfield sites. As space is scarce
in a crowded country like the Netherlands there is on the other hand considerable
pressure to redevelop the land. Recourse to greenfield is not possible in many cases
because there is no suitable space, but this is also du e to the Dutch spatial planning
system and policies like "the compact city". Solutions to urban brownfield problems
are found by the integration of variou s policies for urban redevelopment and
environmental policies. Incorporating the wishes and expectatio ns of stakeholders
such as property developers and interest groups resulted in a number of
programmes being developed. Soil contaminat ion is only one of the many aspects
covered in these programmes. It is not possible to give a complete description of
these programmes here. The 1987 Soil Protection Ac t (SPA) lays down the statutory
requirements for the clean -up of contaminated land. This Act established and
defined a duty of care for the soil, imposi ng a statutory clean-up requirement for
contamination resu lting from certain industrial activities. The party responsible for
causing the contamination is liable for the costs of clean-up, in accordance with the
polluter pays principle. In 1994 further re gulations were drawn up for cases of
contaminated soil. The regulations make a clear distinction between cases whereremediation is conducted by the party conc erned, and where the authorities have the
responsibility.
Policy objectives for redevelopment ar e given in the following policy plans:
• The policy document ’H ousing in the 1990s’,
• The supplement to the Fourth Policy Doc ument on Spatial planning (VINEX),
• The VINEX update,
• The National Environmental Policy Plan 3,
• The plan ’Space for the regions’,
• The ‘Second Transport structure plan',

Country specific Information – The Netherlands
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria95
These plans are at the national level. They provide the basis for further plans at the
provincial and municipal level and give rise to subsidies and a number of financial
schemes. More (but still not complete) information is given in a document preparedby the Dutch ministry for an OECD study on policies for urban brownfield sites.
Legal regulations
• The Urban and Rural Regeneration Act 1985,
• The Soil Protection Act 1987 extended wi th a soil clean up paragraph in 1994,
• The Law on Housing,
• The Spatial Planning Act,
• The Environmental Protection Act.
The legal basis is generally sufficient but could be improved. Brownfield
redevelopment requires an integrated implementation of th ese laws but also an
integration at the financial level. Whether part of the budget for environmental
aspects is spent for spatial planning purposes or vice versa is always a difficult
discussion if the question arises when the pr oject is already starte d. That is the reason
why in the Netherlands so much emphasis is placed on integrated planning.
Central government is currently in the process of renewing its soil contamination
policy (the “BEVER” project) and revising it to be integrated, decentralised and offer a
larger role to the private sector. This change of policy is intended to increase both the
societal and environmental benefits, the intention being that the future remediation of
contaminated land will be adapted to the future land-use. This will allow a more
environmentally sound clean-up-process, while minimising the costs. In addition, the
government intends to take financial, legal and fiscal measures to make it more
attractive for the private sector to invest in the remediation of contaminated land.
Specific initiatives include the BELSTA TO urban renewal fund (approximately 363
million Euro per year available over th e period 1990-2005); the Intrafunds of the
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, and the VINEX
covenants (approximately 408 million Euro budgeted fo r 1995-2005 for contaminated
land). In total a sum of 34 million Euro was available over the period 1996-1999 for
the Netherlands as a whole, of which one-third was for the four large cities.
Gaps and obstacles
• Financial risks. If these are not spread amongst all interest groups the investment
required is often too large.
• Lack of integration of environmental po licy and spatial planning policy. (As far as
soil clean up policy is concerned this will be solved by the revision that is now
taking place. For historical contamination, (before the enforcement of the Soil
Protection Act, 1987) clean up will be re lated to the intended use of the land).

NORWAY
Extent / localisation / types
Brownfield sites are not a problem in Norway . Occasionally such sites emerge but it
is not possible to provide any systematic information on these contaminated sites.
Policy / programmes / actors
There are no governmental programmes as su ch in Norway in support of brownfield
redevelopment. However, government money is spent on the remediation of
contaminated sites where nobody claims th e land, no solvent polluter is known and
action is needed to achiev e a certain level of safety.
The Norwegian pollution cont rol authority prioritises th e handling of cases where
building and construction is planned on cont aminated sites by giving permits with
environmental criteria. These allow sound so lutions, with sufficient consideration of
the economy within the projects to ensure that they are carried out.
Legal regulations
In Norway there are two laws applicable, ne ither of them especially developed for
taking care of brownfield redevelopment: the Pollution Control Act and the Plan and
Building Act. The Planning and Building Ac t allows the municipalities to loosen or
tighten the development pressure on the areas, and the regional authorities tocomment on the area planning. In this way the redevelopment pressures areconcentrated with in urban areas.
Of course this is also a po litical issue, because there is generally an unwillingness
among politicians and the public to expand the borders of urbanisation further intothe greenfield areas.
Gaps and obstacles
None identified.

PORTUGAL
Extent / localisation / types
Brownfield problems in Portugal are re lated to rapid economic change since the
accession to the EU. Transformation of in dustry and relocation is still frequent
leading to under-used industrial areas.
Most of Portuguese industry is located in urban areas, close to residential areas. In
past decades, the cities have grown and spread to the nearest industrial areas. The
co-existence of heavy industry and residential areas is increasing, with severalexamples of dangerous industries (from th e environmental point of view) occurring
in the middle of important urban areas. Th e population is ther efore confronted with
contaminated sites in these urban areas. This leads to an increased number of
community led complaints regarding the potential threats posed by these industries.
For example, BARREIRO is one of worst situ ations where heavy industry is located
in an urban area. Sometimes the problems of soil and water co ntamination are very
important. This is the case with the Seix al area (Lagoa da Palmeira – Siderurgia
Nacional) and the Estarreja area. These two areas cannot be considered purebrownfields, but are characterised by unde rused sites. An important brownfield in
Almada, near Lisbon, is a former ship building area planned for residential use.
On the Portuguese mainland, industrial sites are concentrated along the coastal
areas, with a focus around the large river es tuaries. Mining and extractive industries,
whose spoil heaps and residues contamin ate the soil and the ground water, are
located in the interior of North and Sout h Portugal. Uncontrolle d refuse tips exist
everywhere, in particular close to the urban centres along the most important trafficroutes.
Although no consolidated data has been ma de available about old industrial sites in
Portugal, preliminary information is availa ble on the identificat ion and qualification
of derelict contaminated or suspected sites. In most ca ses these concern still active
industrial sites, mines and refuse tips.
In total it is assumed that at least 2000 contaminated or suspected sites exist in
Portugal as indicated in the preliminary vers ion of the only existing situation report.
Nothing is known about the number of uncontrolled refuse tips. It is reasonable toestimate that these number over 2000.
Potentially contaminated and derelict sites are mainly found in the densely
populated and industrialised centres along the coast. In the interior of the country,they exist mainly in conne ction with mining (approx. 300 sites), close to important
raw material sources (above all timber) and along the rivers.
The above survey on which all the data is based neither quantifies or qualifies the
contaminated areas. No differentiation is made between derelict sites and sites where
contamination is suspected. Contaminants are simply characterised in a general way

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria98
and roughly assigned to geographical areas. More informative data is not available,
although it is believed that improved doc umentation is in preparation. The present
situation in Portugal is characterised by a missing inventory and characterisation ofcontaminated sites as well as the non-existence of criteria and methodologies for riskassessment and rehabilitation.
Policy / programmes / actors
There is no governmental programme for brownfield redevelopm ent in Portugal. A
single programme was develo ped in Lisbon, in the area where we now have the
"Parque das Nações" (the location of the WORLD exposition of EXPO98). In theEstarreja area several studies have been conducted and the government has accepted
the need for remediation of this area. Th ese procedures are in progress and in the
near future the enterprises responsible for the clean up will be determined and thework will start. In the future, strategies will be developed for deteriorated and
priority areas and for specific situations.
The most important actor at the national administrative level is the ”Instituto dos
Resíduos” (waste institute) founded in 1997, which is su bordinate to the Ministry of
the Environment. It is in charge of impleme nting national policies in the waste sector,
the establishment of guidelines and techni cal codes of practice, as well as the
management of areas contaminated with residues or wastes. The centre is alsoresponsible for developing area management strategies, taking into accountEuropean and North-American experience. Until the final establishment of national
standards, the “Preliminary Canadian En vironmental Criteria for Contaminated
Areas” have been used on a provis ional basis (e.g. fo r the EXPO98 area).
Further institutions subordinate to the Ministry of the Environment, or working for
the Ministry and directly or indirectly in volved in area management issues, are:
• Institúto da Aqua (Hydrological Institute),
• Institúto de Meterologia (Meteorological Institute),
• Institúto de Promocäo Ambiental (Institute for the Promotion of Ecology).
The Ministry of the Environment itself is the supreme supervisory authority with
regard to ecological implications in co nnection with area management. On an
interdisciplinary basis, it watches over compliance with the environment related
regulations during all administrative and executive acts. The Mi nistry for Regional
Planning and Public Administration deal s with all planning related, legal and
administrative processes accompanying area management. As the supreme planning
authority, it is among others responsible for the control and approval of municipal
urban development planning, i.e. the most important planning procedure for area
management projects.
On the brownfield sites as such, the munic ipalities concerned are in theory the most
important actors alongside private or p ublic investors. However, there is no

Country specific Information – Portugal
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria99
practicable experience of any significant de relict land or industrial site recycling
project with the exception of EXPO98. In the case of the world exhibition, the
privately owned areas were taken over by the Government owned EXPO company.
For the above-mentioned reasons, private actors have not played any significant role
so far. While there is considerable private in vestment in area relevant projects, these
never concern the problem cases but only urban areas in high quality locations free
from contaminatio n (e.g. new construction in Amor eiras and Chiado in Lisbon) or
subsidised prestigious projec ts (e.g. construction of the new Tejo-bridge “Vasco da
Gama”).
The EXPO 98 initiative
The first comprehensive, successfully implemented and best-documented project is
the development of the EXPO98 area in Lisbon. In order to provide a suitable
framework, laws were specifically passed fo r this project, which define the area of
intervention, secure regional planning measures and grant special tax allowances.
The task consisted of decont aminating a 340 hectare land ar ea on the Tejo river and
returning it to a new use. The original structure was characterised by oil refineries,warehouses, a sulphuric acid factory, dump s and degraded residential quarters. The
measures were planned for the period 1993 – 2008:
• Discontinuation or relocation of old industrial activities,
• Area remediation,
• Construction on the area of the world exhibition,
• Strengthening of local foundations for housing, living and employment functions,
• Development of commercial, cultur al and leisure time activities,
• Enhancement of competitiveness and the outside representation of Lisbon and
Portugal.
In the final stage, the follo wing results are expected:
• 10,000 dwellings with 25,000 inhabitants,
• 16,000 new jobs,
• 64 ha residential area,
• 8.5 ha ”clean” industrial site,
• 22.7 ha traffic areas,
• 80 ha public park,
• 120 ha green spaces and public places,
• Culture and leisure time infrastructures,
• Recovery of the river banks and the harbour areas as public spaces.
Soil remediation was based on the excavation and encapsulation of the contaminated
material in landfills, separated acco rding to the type of contamination. An

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria100
international consortium was charged with planning and risk assessment. This
remediation phase is completed. As far as the general response and financial revenue
is concerned, the world exhibition was n ot able to meet expectations. The effects on
the development of the overall urban project remain to be seen. Further projects inPortugal have not progressed beyond the preliminary survey stage.
The “Specific Programmes for the Develo pment and Ecological Rehabilitation of
Estarreja” (PEDRAE) is a combination of seve ral projects. One of them, ERASE, deals
with the remediation of contaminated industrial sites in Estarreja.
• For the remediation of the Palmeira Lagoon, the type and degree of
contamination is being studied.
• The Petrogal project is studying the type and degree of contamination associated
with two refineries, five fue l storage depots and 100 petr ol stations owned by the
Government-owned oil company.
• The Metalimex project is involved in planning for the clean-up of an area
contaminated by aluminium production residues.
• All projects are financed by the Government or co-financed by the EU, without
polluter participation.
Portugal’s EU accession in 1986 created the financial pr econditions for the necessary
intervention, i.e. means were allocated from the cohesion fund. At the same timemore stringent political and legal standards were introduced by Portugal’s adoption
of EU standards.
Legal regulations
Environmental protection and correct regional planning are tasks of the Portuguese
state, guaranteed by the Constitution (A rt. 9 d, e and 66).
Soil protection is covered in Art. 278 1 and 279 1(a) of the Penal Code (Código Penal),
non-compliance is subject to punishment.
Numerous laws deal with soil, but do not directly concern ecologi cal issues. The Soil
Act (Decreto-Lei N° 794/76 of 1976, amended in 1979, 1980, 1984) regulates soil use
in terms of economic, agricultural and urban development aspects. Further laws
about soil use or soil protection are:
• Lei N° 68/93 of 1993, amended in 1997, conc erns municipal ag ricultural fallow
land and common lands,
• Decreto-Lei N° 117/94 of 1994 concerns th e approval and esta blishment of scrap
and waste iron yards, excavated waste ma terial and construction waste landfills,
and storage areas for solid fuel,
• Decreto-Regulamentar N° 31/95 of 1995 concerns the de signation of preferential
areas for clay and sand extraction,

Country specific Information – Portugal
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria101
• Decreto-Lei N° 239/97 of 1997 regulates th e collection, treatment and removal of
wastes and bans the burying of waste,
• Decreto-Lei N° 446/91 of 1991 is the only la w that establishes a direct relationship
between soil and contamination. It is related to the spreading of sewage treatment
sludge on agricultural areas.
The Environmental Fram ework Act (Lei de Bases do Ambiente, Lei N° 11/87) of 1987
”…defines the foundations of environmental policy …” with reference to the
Portuguese constitution (Art. 1). It obliges the state and citizens to behave in anenvironmentally compatible way and th reatens punishment for non-compliance.
What is important in this co ntext is that the polluter-pa ys principle is laid down in
law, not just with regard to a general lia bility but also with a commitment to restore
the status quo ante. Based on this Environmental Framework Act, numerous other
laws and regulations were adopted, dealing with waste, sewage, noise, agriculture,
and also with specific cases of a regional or topic-related nature. In this context, thesoil is often referred to as an endangered substrate that should be protected, however
it is never a central issue.
In 1998, the ”Framework Regional Planning and Urban Development Act” (Lei N°
48/98) entered into force. Ar t. 14 1 subjects land use to the principles of national
planning, sustainability and careful use of resources.
Gaps and obstacles
Area recycling or area management are almost unknown concepts in Portugal and
are not a prominent issue in a country that has used comprehensive regional
planning for less than a decade. This is pa rtly due to the rather relaxed situation in
the real estate market (with the exception of central locations) coupled with the factthat intensive industrialisation did n ot start before the middle of the 20
th century.
Other gaps include:
• Insufficient awareness by the public and the entire public administration on all
levels,
• Inadequate specific legal instruments,
• Inadequate funding,
• An underdeveloped political will to implement measures,
• Insufficient human resources, and
• A fragmentary leve l of information.
In the short and medium term, Portugal must create the legal and structural
framework for the management of contaminated areas. For this it will be necessary to
create a typology (establishing an official land register, classification and hierarchy)
for contaminated areas; to de fine evaluation criteria; and to determine land reference
values. Research and develo pment projects that will help introduce risk assessment
methods and soil remediation technologies are also needed.

SPAIN
Extent / localisation / types
The regions in which there is a significant presence of brownfield sites are those in
which there has been development of industri al activity, specifica lly related with the
mining industry. At present, these industries have ceased their activity. Sites are
often located close to urban areas and are difficult to redevelop. The most extent
areas are:
• Asturias
• Cartagena
• Basque Country
The National Inventory for Contaminated Land was published in 1993, in which
approximately 18,000 industrial sites were ide ntified as potentia lly contaminated. In
a first phase risk evaluati on, 4,532 of these sites were selected as potentially
contaminated. These sites cons isted principally of industrial sites and landfills, 52%
of which were located in urban areas. Both private and public owned sites were
included in this inventory, from which a first inspection was followed by a basic
preliminary investigation, in order to identify those sites which would be
characterised at a later date.
In 1995, the second phase of the stud y increased the number of potentially
contaminated sites to 4,900. Since 1995, the Autonomous Re gions have been
compiling an inventory of their territory, in order to obtain the total number of siteswhich could be potentially contaminated. Determ ination of sites that requires a
detailed study in order to characterise the p otential risk, taking into consideration the
possible future land use, is also taking place.
In response to an acute demand for action, the ”Secretaria de Estado de Medio
Ambiente y Vivienda” (State Secretariat for Environment and Housing) developed
the National Plan for Remediation of Contaminated Soils (Plan Nacional de
Recuperacion de Suelos Contaminados). This aims to characterise 1650 additional
sites and conducting 275 remediation pr ojects. Estimated 400 Million Euro are
necessary for capital expen diture by the Ministry of Environment and a similar
quantity will be required by the Regional Government.
The sites were characterised as follows:
• Almost all of the sites are not up to statutory (legal) standards, 59 % are often
inaccessible lands.
• 27 % of the sites are located in urban areas, 26 % on open spaces (fields), 21 % on
protected areas, 14.5 % on unplanned area s designated for development and 11.6
% on programmed building land (or construction sites).
• 60 % of the sites present a threat to groundwater.
• Minerals, heavy metals and hydrocarbo ns are the most im portant pollutants.

Country specific Information – Spain
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria103
• 61 sites were given priority as short-term remediation projects, because of the
threat to groundwater, exceptionally high environmental risk and their proximity
to urban centres.
• 85 sites were scheduled for medium-term rehabilitation soils. The remaining 128
sites are scheduled for a long-term remediation, because they do not present anydirect threat to the environment.
When all these regional inventories are co mpleted they will be centralised in the
Ministry of Environment and will be available on the EIONET network.
Policy / programmes / actors
In Spain, there is no specific programme of aid for the regeneration of brownfield sites.
Current important initiatives to redevelop brownfield sites are ongoing in areas of
abandoned mine sites and metal industry processing. Redeveloping areas includes:
• Asturias disused former coal mines and steelworks.
• Murcia; S.E., of Spain, the area near Cart agena – La Unión, in Sierra Minera. Here
there are several lead and zinc mines as well as metal foundries and chemical
facilities, the majority of whic h are no longer operational.
• Navarra
• Basque Country
• Huelva, in Andalucía; especially th e pyritic area in the Tinto River
The lead battery plant of Tudor, in Zarago za was redeveloped some years ago into a
big shopping centre, after the site was remediated.
The National Plan for the Rehabilitatio n of Contaminated Land, approved in
February 1995, could overlap with brownfield redevelopm ent but limits its action
and financing to the renovation of public owned land. Both the Ministry of the
Environment and Auton omous Regions finance 50% of the cost of these actions.
However, the majority of the contaminated and brownfield sites, are owned by theprivate sector.
It is possible for the Autonomous Regions to provide incentives to the private sector
in terms of providing credit to meet remediation costs, which have to be repaid overa period of between 10 to 15 years. This repayment has to be guaranteed by a bankendorsement or by an agreement in which the administration can benefit from the
income generated from the remediation and re-use of the land. The State
Administration can participate in these financial operations, financing 50% of the
amount provided by the Autonomous Regions . The National Plan defines a 10-year
period in which 800 million Euro are provided by the Government to the
Autonomous Regions in order to addr ess identified problems derived from
contaminated land. In-conjunction with the 10-year National Plan, the Governmenthas signed bilateral agreements of co-operation with each Autonomous Regional
Government in order to efficiently co -ordinate the site investigations and

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria104
remediation projects. 1,650 more sites should be assessed wi th 275 contaminated sites
remediated by the year 2005, in addition to the 61 priority categorised sites.
Financing
The capital expenditure for th e realisation of the above mentioned plan is estimated
as 800 million Euro. 50 % of th is is to be born by the Autonomous Governments; the
remaining 50 % have to be financed by either the Ministry of Environment, within
Central Government or from the Cohesion Funds.
Resources are distributed between 4 programmes:
• Identification of potentially contaminat ed sites and characterisation (15 million
Euro)
• Remediation of proj ects(70 million Euro)
• Execution of Projec ts (680 million Euro)
• Monitoring (35 million Euro)

Actors
The former ”Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Transportes y Medio Ambiente” (the
Ministry for Public Works, Transport and Environmental) was an important actor at
the national level. This office founded as a consequence of an expected increased
demand in the national plan to deal with in dustrial waste, pre dicted in 1990, the state
owned company EMGRISA (Empresa pare la Gestión de Residuos Industriales,
Sociaded Estatal).
EMGRISA is responsible for:
• Management, treatment and recycling of all kinds of industrial waste
• Consultation and provision of technical equipment to the industry to minimise
waste production
• Introduction of environmental management systems and environmental audits.
• Remediation of contaminated land
• Qualification and quantifica tion of industrial wastes
• The development and realisation of preven tive measures in order to avoid future
soil pollution
• The assessment and characterisation of other potentially contaminated sites.
This company co-ordinated the first two phases of the National Inventory of
Contaminated Soils. It is also in charge of exploiting the electric power plant in the
city of Melilla, a Spanish Auton omous City in North Africa.
EMIGRISA is part of the Grou p originated by this Minist ry of Environment, which is
developing the contaminated soil remediation guidelines for Spain.

Country specific Information – Spain
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria105
The plan for realisation of the above na med soil quality objectives has different
phases:
• Introduction of soil quality standards
• Publishing of a clearance certificate for remediated sites which qualifies the site as
suitable for building and industrial settlements
• Creation of minimum legal standards
• Formation of comprehensive technical guidelines.
• Qualification and quantifica tion of industrial waste
• Sewage control
• Oil and waste oil – spillage control
• Preparation of wa ste disposal plans
• Studies of environmental tolerance
Legal regulations
This recent law on waste "Ley 10/1998, de 21 de abril, de Residuos" considers
contaminated land for the first time in a le gal context in Spain. Contaminated Land is
defined in Chapter V of the said law under Articles 27 and 28. These articles
established that the responsibility for the remediation of contaminated land lies with
the contaminator and as such, they are obliged to remediate. This is based on thesystem ‘polluter pays’. In Articles 32 to 38, administrative responsibility and the
degrees of sanctions and fines are set out.
Art. 3 p defines the term Contaminated So il as: “soil, which physical, chemical or
biological properties are negatively changed through the presence ofanthropogeneous substances with damaging characteristics and concentrations, that
pose a risk to human health and the enviro nment, according to the defined criteria’s
and standards of the government.”
Art. 27. obligates the regions to compile inve ntories of contaminated sites and to set
up intervention plans. Art. 28 provides th e possibility for financial support during
the remediation, to the private sector.
The Autonomous Governments also have the authority to develop environmental
legislation. Only two regions, Galicia an d Cataluna, have legislation that refers
specifically to contaminated la nd, but this is in the context of broader legislation on
waste. These laws are:
• Ley 6/1993, de 15 de julio Reguladora de Re sidues de la Generalitat de Catalunya
• Ley 10/1997, de 22 de agosto de Residuos Sólidos de Galicia
Both regional laws were published before the national law for wastes, and as such
the only Regional Government that ha s applied the national law with special
reference to soil quality is that of Anda lusia. An Order issued by the Andalusian
Government on December 18th 1998, referred to the Aznalcollar Mine disaster in

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria106
which a tailings dam failure in April 1998 ca used contamination along the course of
the River Guadiamar. This order sets out the background and intervention limits for
soil affected as a result of the disaster.
Scientific and regional planing aspects fall under the “ley 6/1998, de 13. de abril,
sobre régimen de suelo y valoracion es (Soil planing and Valuation)”.
Gaps and obstacles
• The law with special reference to contaminat ed land is still relatively recently
published.
• Lack of background and intervention limits at a national level. Therefore, it is not
possible to penalise polluters an d oblige them to decontaminate.
• Further legislative development of the legal framework for dealing with
contaminated land, is needed as risk assessment methodology, definitions ofbackground levels, etc., are developed.
• The development of environmental legislat ion at the autonomous regional level.
• The possible end use of a brownfield site may not coincide with the municipal
urban plan and this may hinder brownfield redevelopment.
• The budgets of the Administrations are limited to the clean up of publicly owned
property and sites, and to provide incentiv es to the private sector for remediation.
• The real extent of industrially contaminated sites is possibly greater due to the
lack of historical environmental awareness and poor past waste managementpractices.
• The Autonomous Regions are responsible for environmental management and
control. At present, the number of environmental technicians employed at
regional and at local level is still very limited, resulting in environmental control
and checks that are few and far between.
• Lack of financial resources in gene ral in order to develop and execute
remediation programmes.
The regulation for the redevelopment of brownfield sites as it stands today is
insufficient for successful regeneration practise. One of the principal reasons is due tothe lack of a legal definition for remedial action. That is, the step by step process inwhich identified contaminated land is evaluate d, a remedial plan of action is prepared
and executed, and the time scale required for said execution is considered. This is
again influenced by the lack of background and intervention limits at a national level.

UNITED KINGDOM
Extent / localisation / types
Any data describing the extent of brownfie lds need to be explicitly tied to relevant
definitions. The question of a definition for “brownfields” is discussed in ALKER et
al. 2000), which also discusses definiti ons of other related concepts.
In England, successive Derelict La nd Surveys in 1974, 1982, 1988 and 1993 produced
relatively firm data for the extent of la nd which was “so damaged by industrial or
other development that it [was] incapable of beneficial use without treatment”. (Inthis context, “treatment” was taken to include the demolition or clearance ofbuildings and other structures.) The 1993 survey (DOE 1993) identified a total of
39,601 hectares of derelict land in England. The data separately identify different
categories of dereliction such as mining spoil heaps, military land and “general
industrial dereliction”, and distinguish betw een sites in rural, urban and “inner city”
areas.
However, this category of “derelict land” does not form a part icularly close match
with the notion of “brownfield land”, however. First, it excludes some categories thatmight be considered “brownfield”, including land which has been cleared or
reclaimed for development but where the actual development has not yet taken
place, and sites which are “under-used” in social or economic terms. Second, itincludes land that is unlikely to be suit able for development re-use, in particular
minerals working and other sites in rural ar eas. (Half of the “derelict” land in the
1993 English survey was in rural areas.)
In 1998, a new project was started to prod uce a “National Land-Use Database”
(NLUD). The primary purpose for the first phase of this project was to create adatabase to assist in the identification of previously-developed sites which might be,
or might become, available for new develo pment uses; this can be seen as mapping
closely onto the “brownfield” issue. Work continues on populating the database, butinterim statistics released in May 1999 reveal ed that some 33,000 hectares of land had
been identified in England which is prev iously-developed an d either vacant or
derelict, and which might be suitable for re-development. Differences in data
specifications as well as da ta-capture arrangements in comparison with the earlier
Derelict Land Surveys mean that it is di fficult to reconcile NLUD data with earlier
exercises. Although much of the difference can be explained, ther e has been criticism
from some researchers (eg Urban Mines Ltd and the National Brownfield SitesProject) and from some regional and local government bodies that the preliminarydata from NLUD represents an under-estimate of the extent of land which should be
included.
Experience suggests that many potential “brownfield” sites would not be revealed by
such database or survey exercises. This is because they become “brownfield”,
sometimes only for a short period, as their previous use comes to an end. Spatial

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria108
planners in the UK refer to this type of site as “windfall” sites, as they are sites which
become unexpectedly ava ilable for redevelopment.
Across the UK, brownfield sites result fr om a wide range of former industrial
activities. These include mineral extraction, coal and steel production, gasworks,electrical generation, traditional engineerin g-based activities, transport infrastructure
and chemical production as well as a wide range of more minor industrial activities.
In 1996, DOE (now part of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
– DEFRA) published a series of near ly 50 “Industry Profiles”, which provide
information on the history of different industrial activities in the UK and identify the
likely potential contaminatio n problems to be found on the sites involved. (See
www.defra.gov.uk).
Policy / programmes / actors
Policy
The underlying policy aims for promoti ng brownfield redevelopment include:
• The economic and social regeneration of the surrounding areas;
• The environmental im provement of the sites themselves; and
• The reduction in "development pressure" on greenfield sites.
These aims are reflected in the headline land-use policy objective for the national
Government in the UK, which is "to pr omote a sustainable pattern of physical
development and land and property use in cities, towns and the countryside". This
objective is backed up by specific "Public Service Agreement" (PSA) targets for 60%of new housing to be provided on previous ly developed land or through conversion
of existing buildings, and for brownfield land to be reclaimed at a rate of over 1,100
hectares per annum by 2004, reclaiming 5% of current brownfield land by 2004 and
17% by 2010 (DETR 2001).
This land-use objective is also specifical ly linked to a further objective "to enhance
sustainable economic development and social cohesion through integrated regional
and local action, including the promotion of an urban renaissance".
In 1999, an "Urban Task Force", set up by th e national government and chaired by the
architect Richard Rogers (Lord Rogers of Riverside), examined the current and
potential role of national government and other public sector bodies in urban policy,
including the promotion of brownfield redevelopment. The Task Force includedrepresentatives of a range of organisations with an interest in urban regeneration and
its report, Towards an Urba n Renaissance (UTF 1999), made a series of detailed
recommendations for future action.
The Government set out its own framework of policies and programmes, and
responded to the Task Force's recommend ations, in an Urban White Paper, Our towns
and cities: the future – to wards an urban renaissance (DETR 2000a), published in

Country specific Information – United Kingdom
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria109
November 2000. This included what was describ ed as a "new vision of urban living",
including:
• "people shaping the future of their community, supported by strong and truly
representative local leaders;
• people living in attractive, well-kept towns and cities which use space and
buildings well;
• good design and planning which makes it more practical to live in a more
environmentally sustainable way, with less noise, pollution and traffic
congestion;
• towns and cities able to create and share prosperity, investing to help all their
citizens reach their full potential; and
• good quality services – health, education, housing, transport, finance, shopping,
leisure and protection from crime – that meet the needs of people and businesses
wherever they are."
In the detail of the White Paper were spec ific proposals to "use the tax and planning
systems to bring previously-developed 'brownfield' sites and empty property backinto constructive use, turning eyesores into assets".
A summary of the Government's overall policy towards contaminated land issues
(which overlap with brownfield issues ) is set out in DETR Circular 2/2000
Contaminated Land (DETR 2000b); this describes the policy in terms of its impact on
sustainable development. Although the main focus of the Circular is to set out thedetails of the regulatory framework for contaminated sites, it also emphasises the
Government view that the primary route for dealing with much of the legacy of
industrial land cont amination will be through redevelopment.
Programmes and actors
At present in the UK, in ma ny urban areas the redevelopment of brownfield sites is
largely private-sector led – a very significant proportion of projects take place withvery little direct involvement from public bodies and government agencies, except in
their roles as “regulators” issuing and enforcing necessary approvals and legal
permissions (such as town and country planni ng). This private sector focus may be
the result of a combination of the following four factors:
• The fact that most of the current brownfield land stock is already privately-
owned,
• The particular “economic history” of the sites and the industries etc. which were
formerly on the land,
• The current state of the national and regional economies, and in particular the
demand for land in the areas,
• Conscious political choice by successive national governments.
However, there are also significant government programmes to promote and support
brownfield redevelopment. (A descriptio n of the history and development of

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria110
programmes to support brownfield regeneration is set out in Effective Regeneration of
Brownfield Land in the United Kingdom (DENNER & LOWE, 1999).)
These programmes can be split into four types:
• Spatial planning,
• Technical support,
• Financial support,
• Direct development by p ublic bodies and agencies.
Spatial Planning .
The system of “town and country planni ng” promotes brownfield redevelopment
largely by inhibiting or preventing development projects on greenfield sites, and by
making brownfield land available for deve lopment. This is brought about by a
hierarchy of:
• National planning policy (set out by national government in Planning Policy
Guidance notes),
• Regional planning policy (s et collectively by local government bodies in the
region, and the Regional Development Agency), which also includes overall
“structure” planning for the region,
• Local structure and developm ent plans (set by the coun try and distric t councils)
which make zoning decisions for the future use of particular areas of land in the
area,
• Individual decisions on applications fo r planning permission (made by local
planning authorities) which normally should conform with the relevant
development plan.
This structure of guidance cascades the na tional PSA target fo r 60% of housing to be
on previously-developed land or in co nverted buildings into more detailed regional
and local targets. These reflect different lo cal circumstances, such as the availability
of brownfield land suitable for redevelopm ent. To promote the achievement of these
targets, there is a new requirement, set out in Planning Policy Guidance Note 3Housing (DETR 2000c), for a “sequential test” fo r new developments. This test means
that a local planning authority must first satisfy itself that there are no suitable and
available sites which have been previously developed before it can allocate any
greenfield sites for new housing projects.
As well as their roles in development co ntrol, the Regional Development Agencies
and individual local authorities also act to promote economic regeneration of their
respective regions and areas, seeking positively to encourage inward investment andnew development.
Technical support .
This takes both “pro-active” and “re-active” forms. On the “pro-active” side, national
government and other private sector led gr oups fund research and development and

Country specific Information – United Kingdom
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria111
the development of “best practice” advice to assist the development and construction
industries in working on brownfield sites.
On the “re-active” side, the focus is on removing factors that might inhibit
brownfield redevelopment. This work includes:
• Research and development on the applicat ion of new remediation techniques and
technologies,
• Confidence-building initiatives with the financial and property sectors,
• Setting out a system of liability for contaminated land,
• Reviewing the licensing system for land remediation activities,
Wider policy development on issues such as “land assembly” for larger development
projects, and changes to the system of compulsory purchase by public authorities.
Financial support .
Brownfield redevelopment is eligible for dir ect public sector financial support where
this is necessary to achieve social and economic policy objectives. In some regions,public sector intervention is essential to ensure redevelopment. Financial support for
the private sector can take a number of different forms, such as:
• Grant aid, either for particular elements of the costs of development or as “gap
funding”,
• Support for loans, including paym ent of interest and guarantees,
• Other guarantees, e.g. inco me stream guarantees, support for warranty purchase,
• Partnership projects with risk and profit sharing.
Direct funding is generally provided by na tional government through arms’ length
public sector regeneration agencies – English Partnerships and the network ofRegional Development Agenci es in England; the Wels h Development Agency; and
Scottish Enterprise. In some cases, the funding is provided through local authorities,
either directly from national government or via the national or regional regeneration
agencies. In addition to thes e national sources of fundin g, other projects receive
support through Objectives 1 and 2 of the European Regional Development Fund
and other structure funds (such as RECHAR and RENAVAL).
Recent years have seen a slow-down in governmental funding for private sector
schemes as a result of legal problems. The European Commissio n has identified the
main programmes involved as “state aids ” and therefore potentially contrary to EU
competition policy. This means that the programmes – and in some cases, individual
projects – have to be approved in advance by the Commission, and also places strictlimits on the geographical availability of financial support for private sector
development, and on the am ount of support for any in dividual project. New funding
programmes are currently being developed and submitted for approval.
Other indirect financial tools have been used in the past – such as tax breaks for
development proj ects in designated “Enterpr ise Zones”. The 2000 Urban White
Paper committed the national government to investigating new fiscal instruments in

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria112
particular reductions for properties in ec onomically-disadvantaged areas in the sales
tax applied to property (“Stamp Duty”) and tax credits for cleaning up contaminated
land. The Finance Act 2001 has taken forwar d this second idea, allowing companies
to offset 150% of the cost of contaminated land remedia tion against the profits on
which they pay Corporation Tax; in some cases, this tax enhanced tax allowance can
be claimed as a payable "tax credit".
Direct Development
The public sector regeneration agencies and local authorities also carry out “direct
development” projects of the following kinds:
• Fully worked-up developments,
• Preparing “development platforms” for subsequent development by the private
sector,
• More simple “site cl earance” projects,
• Providing roads and other infrastructure on or near potential redevelopment
sites.
Legal regulations
The main legal control on any developmen t is the system of land-use planning set
out in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 1. Any development requires specific
“planning permission”, which may control n ot only the location of development, but
also the nature of that development and the way it is carried out. Specifically in the
context of brownfield redeve lopment, the planning permi ssion may contain specific
conditions relating to site investigation and assessme nt and, where appropriate,
remediation of contamination. Guidance to planning authorities on “contaminatedland” aspects of planning is set out in Planning Policy Guidance note PPG 23
Planning and Pollution Control (DOE, 1994). This guidance is currently being revised,
with a view to the publication of specif ic planning guidance on developments on
land which may be affected by contamin ation. Brownfield re development projects
above a certain size also require environmental impact assessments a s p a r t o f t h e
planning approval process.
In addition, the Building Regulations
2 impose a system of cont rols over the details of
construction of any bu ilding. These cover a range of issu es from the in tegrity of the
foundations, through to issues such as disabled access to public buildings. They
include specific requirem ents to ensure that buildin gs and building services are
protected from the effects of any contam inants in the grou nd under the building.

1 This is administered by Local Planning Authorities, which are usually the municipal or district authority for the
area.
2 This is administered by "registered inspectors", wh o are employed either by the local authority or by an
approved private sector body such as the National House-Building Council.

Country specific Information – United Kingdom
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria113
Land remediation activities may need prior regulatory approval under the waste
management licensing system under Part II of the Envi ronmental Prot ection Act 1990
(which implements the European Waste Framework Directive) or the system ofIntegrated Pollution Pr evention and Control (which implements the directive of the
same name)
3. Some remediation processes are defined (under the Directive) as
“waste disposal” or “waste recovery” operations, and ther efore have to be licensed to
ensure that they are carried out without risk to human health and the environment.Other licensing regimes may also be releva nt in some cases (e.g. the Groundwater
Regulations 1999). The Governme nt is currently reviewin g the operation of waste
management and other controls as they a pply to land remediation projects, and may
introduce a more specific form of regulatory control in the future.
Although the focus of the main “contaminated land” regime
4 (Part IIA of the
Environmental Protecti on Act 1990) is on th e “current” use of land, and it may not
therefore be directly relevant to the redevelopment of land (which is aboutintroducing new uses of land), it does have an indirect re levance. It sets a reference
standard both in technical terms (defining the circumstances in which future
regulatory intervention might be needed) and in legal terms (defining who would be
liable to pay for any further remediation) (D ETR 2000b). This regime is intended to
be complementary to the regime already in existence to protect water resources. Thespecific regulations under the Water Resources Act 19915 are likely to apply to
brownfield sites.
Other regulations covering particular aspects may also be relevant. For example,
Health and Safety legislation6 covers the protection of workers on construction
projects and will have relevance for dealing with hazardous substances.
A more detailed discussion of the relevant legal regimes is given in the Circular on
contaminated land (DETR 2000b) and guidanc e to the construction industry (CIRIA
1997).
A key point is that regulations have been used largely to control how redevelopment
takes place on brownfield sites, and not to force it to happen; this aspect has been
considered as not being possible to achieve by the use of regulations in the UK.
A further important factor in the UK context is that there is an overall “de-
regulatory” culture. Many of the factors that might be subject to control by
regulations in other countries – e.g. a ccreditation of professional advisers, or
protocols for sampling or ch emical analysis – are not subject to regulations. An

3 In so far as these regimes affect land remediation activities, they are adminstered by the Environment Agency
(EA) in England and Wales, and by the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) in Scotland.
4 Adminstered, in most cases, by local authorities.
5 Regulated by the EA and SEPA, as above.6 Regulated by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria114
overview of the effectiveness of efforts to regenerate urban areas generally is
provided in the report of th e Urban Task Force (UTF, 1999).
Gaps and obstacles
Gaps and obstacles in brownfield redevelopm ent have been review ed in the UK by a
number of organisations, in particular by the Parliamentary Office of Science andTechnology (POST 1998) and by th e Urban Task Force (UTF 1999).
Other identified needs include:
Drivers
• Better understanding of the social, economic and environmental factors related to
brownfield site redevelopment,
• Ways to quantify and assess the contribut ion made by brownfield redevelopment
to sustainable development,
• Ways to integrate brownfield considerations to other aspects of regeneration,
such as architecture and social development,
Integration
• Ways of building confidence in brownfield regeneration, e.g. risk communication
methods,
• Tools to promote good practice in brownfield redevelopment, e.g. by
demonstration of technologies, better integration of technical approaches withmanagement needs,
• Holistic approaches to management of la rge areas of brownfield, especially in
dealing with regional groundwater issues, and including optimization of the use
of land (spatial planning approaches),
• Maximizing the benefits from brownfield site regeneration – e.g. in terms of
recycling and re-use of resources on the sites.
Technical aspects
• Cost effective methods for assessing sites for contamination problems,
• Better methods for the evaluation of contamination management technologies,
e.g. in terms of practicability, long term effectiveness and their wider
environmental and resource-use impact,
• Improved practice for communicating with, and involving, stakeholder groups.
A number of initiatives, including research programmes and projects, are already
focused on tackling some of these aspects to promote brownfield regeneration. Theseinitiatives are coordinated by both the pr ivate and the public sectors. For example,
Professor Paul Syms of Sheffield Hallam University has carried out a survey of over
200 practitioners in brownfield redevelopment, from a rang e of different professional

Country specific Information – United Kingdom
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria115
disciplines, to identify the main issues that inhibit the re lease of brownfield land for
development. His report (SYMS 2001) includes a numb er of recommendations.
The Urban Task Force (UTF) highlighted the need for standard reporting about site
information (a "land condition record") an d for ensuring the right multi-disciplinary
skills and experience of key personnel involved in the technical assessment,
development of solutions and communication aspects of dealing with contamination.
These UTF recommendations have been taken forward by a working group
representing a wide range of stakeholders from the property industry and
environmental organisations and professions. The group has developed a standard
Land Condition Record (UTF 2000) and, in associatio n with this, a new examination
and registration systems for specialist professionals. This scheme – Specialists inLand Condition, SILC – is being mana ged by the Institute of Environmental
Management and Assessment, and is jointl y supported by the Ch artered Institution
of Civil Engineers, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, the Royal Society ofChemistry, the Association of Geotechnical Specialists and other organisationsrepresented in the "Ground Forum". Start -up costs for the SILC scheme are being
funded by the Regional Development Agencies.
For the future, a major issue is the desire from developers for a "one stop shop"
approach to licensing – similar to the "concentration effect" in the German Bundes-Bodenschutzgesetz. This was also a recommend ation of the UTF. Many of the aspects
of the current regulations are already under review – in particular the licensing of
remediation activities and the guidance issued to planning authorities.
Further Information
EDWARDS David, Exsite, Hillcrest, Main Street, Hillam, Leeds LS25 5HG, E-mail:
Exsite@btinternet.com
Literature
ALKER 2000: “The Definition of Brownfield” in Journal of Environmental Planning
and Management 43(1), 2000.
CIRIA 1997: “Remedial Treatment for Contam inated Land, volume XII: Policy and
Legislation”, Construction Industry Research and Information Association
Special Publication 112, London 1997
DENNER & LOWE 1999: “Effective Regeneration of Brownfield Land in the United
Kingdom”, paper presented at seminar on brownfield regeneration, Duisburg
Germany, 1999.
DETR 2000a: "Our towns and cities: the futu re – Delivering an urban renaissance",
the Stationery O ffice, London 2000

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria116
DETR 2000b: “DETR Circular 2/2000: Contamin ated Land”, The St ationery Office,
London 2000DETR 2000c “Planning Polic y Guidance Note 3: Housing”, The
Stationery Offi ce, London 2000
DETR 2001 – "DETR Business Plan 2001", DETR, London, 2001DOE 1995: “Survey of Derelict Land in England, 1993”, HMSO, London, 1995
POST 1998: “A Brown and Pleasant Land – Household Grow th and Brownfield
Sites”, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London 1998
SYMS 2001: “Releasing brownfields ”, RICS Foundation, London 2001
UTF 1999: “Towards an Urban Renaissance – fi nal report of the Urban Task Force”, E
& FN Spon, London 1999.
UTF 2000: “A Standard Land Condition Record”, Institute of Environmental
Management and Assessment, London 2000

ANNEX 2
Check List on Land Recycling

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria118
Introduction
The present Check List on Land Recycling provides a tool for the comprehensive
analysis of land recycling projects. By applying the chec k list, the user becomes more
aware of the complexity of such projects and obtains an overview of all relevant
issues. Deficiencies in planning and im plementation can be identified and then
counteracted by following the recommendations given. The check list thus makesthese recommendations accessible for practical use. The questions of the check listhave been derived from an original set of 68 questions which have been developed as
part of a German R&D project (based on the findings obtained in project
evaluations). CLARINET Working Group 1 modified and adopted the questions tobe compatible to the legal and planning sy stems in the countries of the European
Union.
Structure of the check list
The check list consists of an introduction including a legend and procedural
instructions, sets of questions designed to generate general project data as well asinformation on factors of influence/fields of action, a list of questions concerningdefined elements of a comp rehensive economic-viability analysis, and an evaluation
matrix which allows a direct evaluation of the answers given.
The general data are intended to enable the user to categorise the project and to
allocate it to one of the project phases which land recycling projects commonly
undergo.
A comparison of land recycling projects shows that each project goes through
specific phases which are the same for all projects irrespective of their type andscope. The process starts with the prepar ation and planning ph ase, continues with
the execution or impleme ntation phase and ends with the re sult of the project, i.e. its
completion. In the case of complex projects all sub-projects may have to be runthrough these phases, while the phases of the various sub-projects may notnecessarily coincide. As a result, the de veloper or project manager may have to
handle many different phases at the same time and to co-ordinate the results of this
work for consideration in the overall evaluation.
The categorisation and differentiation of projects to be evaluated through the check
list is based on the followi ng main project phases:
• Initiation and orientation
• Permitting under building law
• Execution/im plementation

Check List on Land Recycling
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria119
For each of these phases or milestones, a separate evaluation matrix is annexed to the
check list.
The questions included in the check list address the elements of key fields of action in
the area of land recycling. They are based on the findings obtained in projectevaluations carried out as part of the research project as well as on the
recommendations which have been derived from them. The questions reflect the
common procedural patterns identified in th e research project for land recycling
projects, in combination with the recommendations given on how to optimise theprocess. This ensures that the check list’s 50 questions cover all central issues of a
typical project.
Data evaluation
The evaluation of the data generated through the check list takes place in a phase-
oriented manner. An evaluation mask which varies according to the respective
project’s planning status, as defined above, is used to identify both the optimal status
as well as existing or emerging deficiencies of the project concer ned. The user readily
obtains an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of a project and can quicklydetermine whether the progress made m eets the minimum requirement for the
project phase in question.
The evaluation masks cover all tasks specif ied in the check list, indicating for each
the optimal status as well as different levels of deficiency in th e status of the work.
Guidance on the completion of the check list and data evaluation
The check list is filled out like a normal qu estionnaire. For each question, there are
six possible responses (yes – no – in preparation – not necessary – not possible – not
known). Upon completion of the check list the responses are copied into the
”evaluation matrix” table.
For evaluation purposes, one of the five attached evaluation masks is placed on top
of the evaluation matrix, making sure to choose the mask that corresponds to the
planning status of the project to be eval uated (initiation phase – planning phase –
permitting under building law – implementation – completion).
In the evaluation masks, all responses to the check list are evaluated by way of a
hatching code. The hatching codes encompass five evaluation categories: optimal
status, non-crit ical status, critic al status, unacceptable st atus and neutral assessment
(task not feasible).
This evaluation system facilitates a qualit ative evaluation of the status of a given
project. The evaluation mask enables the user to directly recognise whether the actual
project management status in the relevant project phase and the various fields ofaction is optimal or possibly critical.

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria120
If a response is shown to fall within the crit ical or unacceptable range, the user can
consult the catalogue of recommendations in which the steps necessary to attain an
optimal work status are mapped out for each field of action covered by the check list.
A: General project data
Name of project
Town/community
Region
B. Description of site
Size of site: in m2:
C. Location
Inner-urban
Suburban
Extra-urban/rural
D. Previous use
Existing buildings and
installations, proportion of
site occupied by buildings
Types of uses of surroundingareas:
E. Planned uses (for land recycling)
Description of the type of new use proposed

Check List on Land Recycling
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria121
F. At what stage of planning is the project ?
(Data-analysis filter to be sele cted according to the box checked)
Initiation phase (feasibility planning)
Permitting phase (spatial planning, environmental
permits
Execution phase (contract appointment, site works)
G. Present use (status of project)
The site is not used at present
Partial or interim
use:
Progress made [in %] towards realis ation of final (post-LR) use: ……..%

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria122
Section A
Options under planning law
Where a local development plan exists:
1. Have zoning decisions under planning law to coordinate post-LR use and the
clean-up of contaminated areas been used?
Yes Under not
No not necessary unknown
2. Has the proposed use or layout of the site been modified to optimise the
treatment cost and time?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
Section B:
Permitting procedures / Integrated permitting/licensing
3. Has an analysis of potential legal obstacles been carried out with respect to any
special provisions under planning and permitting law?
Yes under not
No not necessary Unknown
4. Have the results of this analysis been accepted by agreed to by representatives
of government authorities?
Yes under not
No not necessary Unknown
5. Has the permitting process been speeded up by a consolidation of different
permitting procedures and an integratio n/coordination of the responsibilities of
the various authorities?
Yes under not
no not necessary Unknown

Check List on Land Recycling
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria123
Section C:
Political framework
6. Has a land reclamation policy or guid elines been drawn up/approved/accepted
by the local government?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
7. Did the developer analyse the local political situation at the beginning of theplanning process?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
8. Has the local government clearly expressed the political will to carry out land
recycling, has it done so in writing?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
9. Were the project’s objectives discussed and co-ordinated with local-government
representatives before it was launched?
yes under Not
no not necessary Unknown
10. Has a contact person been designated by the local government who represents
or co-ordinates all departments/author ities concerned in dealings with the
developer?
Yes under Not
No not necessary Unknown

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria124
Section D:
Project organisation – Authorities
11. Is there a contact person with ade quate decision-making powers (planning,
environment, promotion of economic development) or a co-ordination unit
available on the part of the authorities?
Yes under Not
No not necessary Unknown
12. Has the local planning authority been involved in decision-making?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
13. Has an advisory body been installed, in which all relevant decision-makers are
represented?
Yes Under not
No Not necessary unknown
Section E:
Project organisation – Developer
14. Has land reuse through re clamation/remediation been made the defined goal
of the project?
Yes Under not
No Not necessary unknown
15. Have the decision-makers necessary to achieve the defined goal been
designated at the begi nning of the project?
Yes Under not possible
No not necessary unknown

Check List on Land Recycling
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria125
16. Have these decision-makers been assigned clearly defined fields of
responsibility?
Yes Under not possible
No Not necessary unknown
17. Does the developer check at regular in tervals whether the sub-goals that have
been derived on that basis are being ac hieved and orientation towards the overall
goal is being maintained?
Yes Under not possible
No Not necessary unknown
18. Has an individual responsible for performi ng this check been designated or an
interdisciplinary team with clear leader responsible for the project been formed?
yes Under not
no Not necessary unknown
19. Is the project performed by a priv ate legal structure? (Discussion)
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
Section F:
Analysis of overall economic viab ility / financial risk management
20. Has an analysis of overall economic viability, including the aspects listed in
Appendix 1, been performed?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
21. Is this analysis continued in the co urse of the project to serve as cost-
controlling instrument?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
22. Have several use options been cons idered and their costs calculated?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria126
23. Has a validation including ecological/ contamination aspe cts been performed?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
Section G:
Valuation
24. Did the methodology used determine th e value of site specific brownfield
restrictions?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
25. Have the findings obtained in other disci plines (notably site preparation) been
taken into account in the determination of the value of the site and of thebuildings it contains?
Yes Under not
No Not necessary unknown
26. Has the effect of the presence of contaminants on the site value (either positive,
e.g. through minerals recovery – or nega tive, e.g. through the co st of remediation)
been taken into account?
Yes under not
No not necessary Unknown
27. Have the results of site- and building-va luation been taken into account in the
analysis of overall economic viability?
Yes under Not
No not necessary Unknown

Check List on Land Recycling
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria127
Section H :
Funding instruments
28. Was a systematic analysis carried ou t at the beginning of the project of
available funding options?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
29. Have the project objectives been evaluate d in terms of their ability to gain best
access to available funding mechanism? Has the question been explored whether
an optimisation of the project’s objectives would enable a more effective use of the
available funding mechanism?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
Section I:
Use / Proposed use
30. Were different alternatives consider ed in drawing up the proposed use?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
31. Is the planned use and site lay out fl exible enough to a llow modifications in
the event that additional site problems are identified?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
32. Has it been ensured that results from in vestigations into site contamination
are/will be taken into account in the planned use?
Yes Under not
No not necessary unknown

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria128
33. Has a record been made of old infrastructure, underground services etc.
according to type, quantity and quality and have the results been taken into
account in drawing up the planned use?
yes Under not
No Not necessary unknown
34. Has a record been made of natural and landscape features, e.g. Protected
species, trees according to type, quantit y and quality and have the results been
taken into account in drawing up the planned use?
yes Under not
no not necessary unknown
35. Will the planned project be incorporated into a comprehensive urbandevelopment concept?
yes Under not
no not necessary unknown
Section J
Marketing / Public relations
Marketing:
36. Has a strategy for site marketing been drawn up?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
37. Has a market analysis been carried out for use in the analysis of overall
economic viability?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
38. Have site-related economic risks ( co st over runs, lower rental yields) been
taken into account?
Yes under not
No Not necessary unknown

Check List on Land Recycling
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria129
39. Does a strategy exist for responding to suggestions and concerns that investors
may have concerning the reclam ation of an abandoned site?
Yes under not
no Not necessary unknown
Public relations:
40. Does a strategy exist for responding to suggestions and reservations that
citizens and future users may have concer ning the reclamation of an abandoned
site?
Yes under not
No Not necessary Unknown
41. Have concerns and interests of thir d parties (neighbours, residents) been
determined and taken into account?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
42. Has a conflict-management procedure been instituted to jointly resolve
identified conflicts?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
Section K:
Site reclamation (contamination, underground)
43. Have investigations been carried out to ascertain whether the soil and
groundwater is contaminated as a result of previous uses?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown
44. Have detailed investigations into the site’s history and hydrogeological
conditions as well as a detailed hazard assessment been performed to allow a
sufficiently reliable estimate to be ma de of the techniques, funds and time
required for site preparation?
Yes under not
No not necessary unknown

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria130
45. Do the reports on the in vestigations conducted co ntain basic data for the
evaluation of man made fill (made ground) material?
Yes under Not
No not necessary Unknown
46. Have the remediation objectives a nd the planned use been co-ordinated?
Yes under not
No not necessary Unknown
47. Have the remediation objectives been set down in a fo rmal/legal agreement?
Has the option of laying the remediation objectives down in formal agreements
been utilised?
yes under not
no not necessary Unknown
48. Have the remediation and containment techniques to be applied been chosen
in accordance with the subsequent use of the site?
yes under not
no not necessary unknown
49. Did the analysis of remediation or co ntainment alternatives include the aspect
of whether contaminated material arising in site treatment can remain at the site?
yes under not
no not necessary unknown
50. Did the analysis include the question of whether synergie s would be achieved
by combining the developmen t and remediation concepts?
yes under not
no not necessary unknown

Check List on Land Recycling
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria131
1.1 Appendix 1 of the Check-list:
Contents of the analysis of overall economic viability (Investment appraisal)
Cost in /G189/G189 /G3 / m²
Planning costs
Project management / control
Informal planning, invitation of
tenders
Urban planning
Urban land use planning procedure
Technical costs
Surveying
Expert opinions
Public policy measures
Construction geology investigations
Investigations into sitecontamination
Remediation / containment
Earth moving works
Other costs
Site acquisition
Development
Compensation and substitutemeasures
Marketing
Financing
Total

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria132
Cost in /G189/G189 /G3 / m²
Proceeds/Income
Sale (property / buildings)
Letting (property / buildings)
Material recycling
Interim use
Total proceeds
Funding provided
Balance from costs and
proceeds/income
1.2 Appendix 2 of the Check-List
/G0 Evaluation Matrix
/G0 Legend for complete the evaluation – matrix
/G0 Evaluation Matrix – Initiation phase
/G0 Evaluation Matrix – Permitting phase
/G0 Evaluation Matrix – Execution Phase

Check List on Land Recycling
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria133
EVALUATION – MATRIX
SECTION YES NO Under not not unknown
Consideration necessary possible
1
A 2
3
B 4
5
6
7
C 8
9
10
11
D 12
13
14
15
16
E 17
18
19
20
F 21
22
23
24
G 25
26
27
28
H 29
30
31
I 32
33
34
35
36
37
J 38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
K 46
47
48
49
50

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria134
Legend for the evaluation – matrix
YES Task completed
NO Task not completedunder
consideration
not necessary Task is not necessary due to project specification
not possible Realisation of the task is not possible although necessaryunknown No information on task completion available
Meaning of the hatching
Optimal status of project progress
Indicates the tasks and the required status of planning or completion
Non-critical status
Makes clear that a project was recognised, however not suitably solved
Critical status of project progress
Status of work is likely to cause conflicts in subsequent project phases
Unacceptable status of project progress
Identifies areas of conflict, clarifies the chances for implementation and
identifies the availability of information
Achievement not possible at timeTask is under preparation or on the way

Check List on Land Recycling
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria135
EVALUATION – MATRIX: Initiation phase
SECTION YES NO Under not not unknown
Consideration necessary possible
1
A 2
3
B 4
5
6
7
C 8
9
10
11
D 12
13
14
15
16
E 17
18
19
20
F 21
22
23
24
G 25
26
27
28
H 29
30
31
I 32
33
34
35
36
37
J 38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
K 46
47
48
49
50

CLARINET – Brownfields Redevelopment
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria136
EVALUATION – MATRIX – Permiting phase
SECTION YES NO Under not not unknown
Consideration necessary possible
1
A 2
3
B 4
5
6
7
C 8
9
10
11
D 12
13
14
15
16
E 17
18
19
20
F 21
22
23
24
G 25
26
27
28
H 29
30
31
I 32
33
34
35
36
37
J 38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
K 46
47
48
49
50

Check List on Land Recycling
Umweltbundesamt/Federal Environment Agency – Austria137
EVALUATION – MATRIX – Execution phase
SECTION YES NO Under not not unknown
Consideration necessary possible
1
A 2
3
B4
5
6
7
C 8
9
10
11
D 12
13
14
15
16
E 17
18
19
20
F2 1
22
23
24
G 25
26
27
28
H2 9
30
31
I 32
33
34
35
36
37
J3 8
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
K 46
47
48
49
50

Prepared by Working Group “Brownfield Redevelopment” of
the Concerted Action Contaminated Land Rehabilitation
Network for Environmental Technologies (CLARINET) funded
by the European Commission, DG Research, under the
Environment and Climate Programme and coordinated by
the Austrian Federal Environment Agency
Brownfields and
Redevelopment of Urban Areas
Further CLARINET publications in this series:
!Sustainable Management of Contaminated Land:
An Overview
!Contaminated Land and its Impact on Water R esources
!Remediation of Contaminated Land. T echnology
Implementation in Europe – State-of-the-Art
!Review of Decision Support Tools and their use in Europe
!An Analysis of National and EU RTD Programmes related to
sustainable Land and Groundwater Management
!Clarinet Final Conference, P roceedings; 21/22 June 2001,
Vienna, Austria