Sustainability 2021 , 13, x. https:doi.org10.3390xxxxx www.mdpi.comjournal sustainability [616736]

Sustainability 2021 , 13, x. https://doi.org/10.3390/xxxxx www.mdpi.com/journal/ sustainability
Article 1
Phytoremediation of metal contaminated soil of firing area by 2
use of Helianthus. Annuus (Sunflower) plant 3
Bilal 1, Muhammad Noman 1, Kokab Saba Ali 3, Asim Khan 4, Qunshan Wei 1,2,* 4
1 College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China; bi- 5
[anonimizat] (B.); [anonimizat] (M.N.) 6
2 State Environmental Protection Engine ering Center for Pollution Treatment and Control in Textile Industry, 7
Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China; [anonimizat] (Q.W.) 8
3 Department of Geospatial Sciences (GIS/RS), National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Pesha- 9
war, Peshaw ar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 25120, Pakistan; [anonimizat] (K.S.A.) 10
4 School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 11
Shanghai 200237, China; [anonimizat] (A.K.) 12
* Correspondence: qswei@dhu.e du.cn ; Tel. & Fax : +86 02167792557 13
Abstract: Helianthus. Annuus specie capability of Phyto -remediation was observed for the dirty 14
soil with have metals, Cd, as well Pb. Selected plant seedlings germinated in loamy and sand soil 15
mixture were moved to pots of soil carrying through areas of firing as well for the stage of repro- 16
ductive growth allowed to grow. By using AAS, the harvested plant was analyzed for selected met- 17
als. During picking research plant, Helianthus. Annuus highest removal efficiency exh ibited (i.e., 18
73.04%) for Pb in control environment while in an open environment (i.e., 62.52%). By this proof Pb 19
to be hyperaccumulator through the soil of firing areas. The Helianthus. Annuus reduced in the soil 20
appreciably the level of selected metals C d and Pb, but excessive phytoextraction capability for Pb 21
was represented. H. annuus showed for Pb the excessive capability of removal. Therefore, it was 22
concluded that various plant species acquire various phytoremediation capabilities under given 23
conditi ons. 24
Keywords: phytoremediation ; firing areas ; Cd; Pb 25
26
1. Introduction 27
Areas of firing are utilized as the most part for common acts as a military to little 28
weapons as well ammo and generally contain a type as metal targets set before an effect 29
embankment furnished with projectile snares. The bullet travels enter -into point place as 30
well come upon effect shoulder, entering as well spreading. Pb is utilized for mid creation 31
in shot development alongside different metals, for example, Ni, antimony, and arsenic. 32
These metals on firing, falter revealed as accomplished as well rough particulate and get 33
put away on near to soil, consequently contaminating it strongly. For the most part, those 34
metals move on the prompt region of the picked region as the well tainting level of 35
pointed region diminishes quickly to profundity [ 1]. The soil contamination level of ter- 36
minating areas was likewise founded to increment to expansion on time terminating bi- 37
ography. Therefore, critical require w ith toxic metals through those tainted regions to con- 38
trol the perilous impacts emerging thereof because of close by groundwater as well as 39
horticultural soils. As of late, Phyto -extraction has raised a financial value strategy with 40
rectifying the mental de filement. For Phyto -extraction perfect plant subfamily are these 41
own capacity with gathering as well endure more amounts of metals in harvestable or- 42
gans, as well show the quick rate of growth [ 2, 3]. The gath ering of metals through plants 43
is managed through their enlargement value and potentiality to move metals the beyond 44
the ground organs [ 4, 5]. Plant species large assortment tried theirs phytoextraction 45 Citation: Lastname, F.; Lastname , F.;
Last-name, F. Title. Sustainability
2021 , 13, x.
https://doi.org/10.3390/xxxxx
Received: date
Accepted: date
Published: date
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu-
tral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and insti-
tutional affiliations.

Copyright: © 2020 by the authors.
Submitted for possible open access
publication under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses
/by/4.0/).

Sustainability 2021 , 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 10
abilities with regards to various metals, e.g., different clover (Trifolium pra -tense L.), pani- 46
cum (Panicum counteractant), Brassica sp., Nicotiana sp as well Salix populous [ 6–8]. Ag- 47
riculture yields like Amaranthus sp., Zea maize, Cucurbita pepo, as well sativus olei- 48
formis have effectively utilized as well metal gatherers just as translocators [ 9, 10]. [11] 49
examined that R. sativus as well Brassica napus developed on various sullied soils shown 50
up smarter to recover an insignificantly contaminated soil. Brassica juncea plant species 51
shown maximum groun ded power to collect Pb in plant roots as well, consequently shift 52
toward shoots of the plant from soils through accommodating sulfates fertilizer as well 53
phosphates [ 12]. Same, between vetiver grass different diversities, grasses , were founded 54
on enduring better Pb polluted soils [ 13, 14]. Phytoextraction span fundamental cost factor 55
is for Phyto -extraction. Phyto -extraction word through specific gigantic metal spoil soil is 56
evaluated by preferring straight connection transport linking the absorbent consequential 57
metal material on earth and tremendous metal material in shoots of plant shoots [ 15]. In 58
current cases, efficient metal absorb through reme diation plants species is blocked by little 59
Phyto openness of zeroed on metals. That’s why many chelates like EDTA were utilized 60
to update the bioavailability of the metals in the earth as high as various proficiency 61
through describing succulent M -chelant shape. In any case, these chelates likewise im- 62
prove the danger of metal filtering through soil to groundwater [ 16, 17]. Danger metal 63
filtering through the dirt might be diminished through utilizing re asonable chelate com- 64
pounds on fitting portion [ 18–20]. For EDTA, optimal phytoextraction portion for soils for 65
7 days was seen as ten mM profoundly polluted through Pb [ 21, 22]. In substandard soil, 66
EDTA of two usages than once were more harmful [ 23]. Chelan use for various phases for 67
the development of plant creates various outcomes. The uses of EDTA before seed devel- 68
opment fundamentally diminished Seedling evolution of Helianthus annuus as well as 69
dried weight. So, soil accessible Pb and then biomass in the herbs, Pb's fixations were 70
founded increment to EDTA aggregation yet the exact measure of Pb of phytoextracted 71
diminished it huge EDTA focuses due to extreme development despondency [ 24]. Control 72
through environment and Pb -derelict soil division was bio -availability, remedy and ab- 73
sorb Pb throu gh coffee weed were reform through convert dirt to willing chelate mixture 74
especially after plants presented itself all opinion regarding unthinkable imprint [ 25]. 75
Heavy metals in soils at massive focuses adversely pretentious herbs tallness and horti- 76
cultural profitability. The current examination thus targets that remediation method for 77
polluted soils of shooting areas by using of H. annuus specie. 78
2. Materials and Methods 79
2.1. Soil Collection 80
The Soil was gathered from 0 to 6 cm profound from the soil upper layer through site 81
of shooting to assistance shovel of plastic behind leaves of evacuating grass as well other 82
enormous outer items in sacks of polythene put away at cooler to 4 LC to limit movement 83
of bacterial. So as main tain a strategic distance from any error with the metal examination, 84
utilization through the gathering of metal holders, blending as well capacity, was endure 85
away from. Soil pH was examined through put up a 2:1 water -soil conglomeration, that 86
was noted as 5.7. 87
2.2. Assurance and Quality control 88
All crystal utilized and current experimentation was excellent during that time, Pyrex 89
glass, acid -resistant. Evaluation of analytical reagents verified immaculateness of 99% as 90
well metal standard stock arrangement 1000 ppm through Atomic Absorption Spectrom- 91
eter (AAS) investigation, through E. Merck Germany were obtained. By installation debil- 92
itating of stock, standard plans the working benchmarks were set up with twofold puri- 93
fied water. AAS Z -5000 HITACHI framework outfitted with the Zeeman adjustment of- 94
fice's surround was utilized through the whole analytical situation of mental calculation. 95

Sustainability 2021 , 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 10
The standard technique of calibration was received through the evaluation of outcomes, 96
and tests of triplicate were raced to guarantee quantitative outcomes perfection. 97
2.3. Greenhouse experimental designing 98
Seed plant species, i.e., H. annuus, was developed at a blend of alluvial soil as well 99
sand. After four weeks pot plantlets were moved through soil carrying stewpots, 1 kg 100
gathered at areas of firing. Plants were kept in stewpots for growth to two categories for, 101
i.e., control as the well open environment. After 15 days, these gathered plants were dried 102
to consistent weight and washed then with deionized water . In this way, the plants in a 103
ball processing plant were ground. 104
2.4. Concentration of metals determination 105
So as assessed metal substance of herbs through Atomic Absorption Spectrometer 106
(AAS), tissues of herbs were gathered, entirely cleaned through deio nized water as well 107
in this way air dried up. Precisely (0.5 g) weighed of maintained up, as well topsoil plant 108
tests finely were processed to HNO3, H2SO4, and HClO4 through around 15 min at a 109
Kjeldahl absorption vessel. Substances were boiled for a couple of minutes as well filtered 110
[26]. The solution in this manner acquired was suctioned through AAS. Samples of soil 111
were calculated before when plantlets of pot were shift with regard to stewpots, as well 112
after yield volatilized models was contented griddle of 2 mm as well sometime later re- 113
sected of policy made by (US -EPA) for assessment metals reachable in soils [ 27]. In short, 114
2.5 mg/kg part of desiccated as well griddle soil was extract care of t o a blend HNO3 and 115
30% H2O2 for 30 minutes as well accordingly warmed through HCl Conc. for 20 minutes 116
without bubbling. The constituents were then filtered, cool, as well weakened up to 50 mL 117
to purified water [ 28]. 118
2.5. The following formulae were used for Bioaccumulation coefficients (BAC), Bio- 119
concentration factor (BCF) as well as Translocation factor (TF) 120
Bioconcentration factor (BCF) as well Bioaccumulation factor (BAC) give shoots ca- 121
pability indication and accumulate hea vy metal by roots to regard concentration of heavy 122
metal in soil [ 29]. Bioconcentration factor (BCF) was determined through equation 2 [ 30]. 123
The Translocation factor (TF) was determined through equation 3 [ 31]. The Bioaccumula- 124
tion Coefficient factor (BAC) was determined by using equation 1 [ 32] 125
126
BAC = Metal concentration in shoot (mg/kg)
Metal concentration in soil (mg/kg) (1) 127
128
BCF = Metal concentration in roots (mg/kg)
Metal concentration in soil (mg/kg) (2) 129
130
According [ 33] Translocator factor (TF) was determine d 131
132
TF = Metal concentration in shoot (mg/kg)
Metal concentration in roots (mg/kg) (3) 133
134
2.6. Statistics 135
Comprehend connection among all out -metal concentration in the soil and their take – 136
up through plants, factual butt -centric examination of the metal information acquired 137
through Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS) was done. It intricates the draw out of 138
fundamental factual parameters key to decide the expansion as well appropriation of eval- 139
uated information, i.e. standard deviation, mean as well so forth. 140
3. Results and Discussion 141

Sustainability 2021 , 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 10
The areas of firing are exceptionally polluted t hrough metals, for example, Pb due to 142
rigorous activities of firing. These considerable metals will not just destroy close through 143
prepared scenes yet may also soak into the groundwater as necessities compromise its 144
quality. The current assessment subseque ntly oversees not simply the affirmation of im- 145
purity soil level of released area of firing yet furthermore phytoremediation by H. annuus 146
using of species. The soil region of firing in same way demonstrated a multi -metal devel- 147
opment that authentic to a vita l circumstance Table.4.1 addresses the basic encounters re- 148
lating to levels of metal in soil tests gathered of various experimental vessels i.e., H. an- 149
nuus. Soil models gathered at H. annuus vessel after collect demonstrated essential means 150
focus for Pb whi ch was found to be open at 1.086 mg/L in the plant root in the control 151
environment. While in open environment, mean of Pb was found 0.960mg/L and mean of 152
Cd was saw to be available at the minimum level of 0.144mg/L in control environment in 153
plant root as w ell with 0.106 mg/L mean in open environment respectively shown in Ta- 154
ble1. 155
156
Table 1 . Cd and Pb accumulation of H. annuus plant 157
Control Environment Open Environment
Cd
Mean Cd
Std
Dev Pb
Mean Pb
Std Dev Cd
Mean Cd
Std Dev
Pb
Mean
Pb
Std
Dev

Soil
sample 2.5
mg/k
g 2.5
mg/kg 2.5
mg/kg 2.5 mg/kg
Root 0.144
mg/L
0.0299
1.086
mg/L
0.0101
0.106
mg/L
0.0121
0.960
mg/L
0.0475

Shoot 0.121
mg/L
0.0044
0.376
mg/L
0.0603
0.101
mg/L
0.0070
0.305
mg/L
0.0206

Leaves 0.111
mg/L
0.0163
0.364
mg/L
0.0285
0.098
mg/L
0.0115
0.298
mg/L
0.0271

158
After harvested of H. annuus plant the contents of metal reduced to a level which 159
revealed the ability of phytoextraction of different metals intended as Cd:15.04%, Pb: 160
73.04% in control environment shown in Fig. A1, while Cd: 12.20%, Pb: 62.52% was deter- 161
mined in the open environment shown in the Fig.. A2 However, the maximum capacity of 162
the phytoextraction of H. annuus plant for Pb was exhibited. H. annuus showed the high- 163
est removal capabil ity for Pb. 164
165

Sustainability 2021 , 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 10
Root Shoot Leaves010203040Percentage (%)
Control Environment Cd Pb
166
Fig.A1 Adsorption of Cd and Pb percent composition of H. annuus in control envi- 167
ronment 168
169
Root Shoot Leaves010203040Percentage (%)
Open Environment Cd Pb
170
Fig.A2 Adsorption of Cd and Pb percent composition of H. annuus in open environ- 171
ment 172
3.1. Accumulation of metals in plant various parts 173
Plants filled to metal build up soils take up particles of metal in fluctuating amounts. 174
Plant metal adsorb is temporary distressed through openness of metals, that is later con- 175
strained through of both factors of plant -related as well soil factors related. Past investi- 176
gations were indicated just indigent connections be tween's metal take -up through plant 177
species as well contents of metal [ 34]. In the current evaluation, Cd and Pb metal particles 178
were affix up with dissolvable structures to guarantee its tall transparency for the specie 179
of plant take -up. Sunflower indicates excessive ass urance from significant metals as well, 180
are utilized for phytoremediation [ 35, 36]. Finding got [ 37] investigated that little assess- 181
ment of Cd, Pb as well Ni practice animated root as well shoot reaching out plants of 182
Helianthus. annuus at any level at excessive adsorption, basically decreased plants pro- 183
gression as well germination (%) specifically shoot as well root enlargement. Cd and Pb 184
substance in root as well sho ot frameworks of Helianthus. annuus increase as metal accu- 185
mulation in soil increased (Table.1). The most imperative Cd (1.44 and 106 mg/L), and Pb 186
(1.086 and 0.960 mg/L) substance in plant root, separately both in the control environment 187

Sustainability 2021 , 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 10
and open environme nt. Shoot Cd and Pb substance from 0.101 to 0.121 and from 0.305 to 188
0.376, separately, while root Cd and Pb substance from 0.106 to 0.144 and from 0.960 to 189
1.086, separately. Metals adsorption was observed highest in control environment as well 190
lowest in o pen environment root Pb was more than shoot, Pb in plant grown on soil. 191
Nonetheless, show up were no critical contrasts linking the contents of Cd in shoots as 192
well in roots. 193
3.2. Cd and Pb translocation factor (TF) and bioaccumulation factor 194
The utilizati on of translocation as well bioaccumulation factors demonstrated to be 195
appropriate instruments for distinguishing power of developing plant species for parti- 196
cles of metal absorb. The Results were shown in Fig. A3 and Fig.4 which indicates assess- 197
ments of bi oaccumulation components of Cd as well Pb. For the most part, H. annuus 198
aggregates a lot of quantity of Cd and Pb in its root contrasted with the shoot. H. annuus 199
uptake more quantity of Pb into their roots contrasted to Cd. From soil, the exchange of 200
Cd i nto plant root prompted evaluation of BAF >1 average estimation with 1.39. BAF >1 201
value demonstrates the capacity of the developing plants for the accumulation of metals. 202
The got results suggested that H. annuus can aggregate a lot of quantity of Cd in the ir 203
tissues contrasted with Pb. Therefore, studied plant can utilize for Cd sullied soil through 204
remediation. Fig.3 and Fig. A4 demonstrate Cd and Pb Transfer Factor (TF). H. annuus is 205
very positive for Cd take -up contrasted with Pb; therefore, the moving quantity of Cd 206
toward tissues of plant was excessive than Pb. Gained results are simultaneousness with 207
past research work [ 38] and [ 39]; they detected that H. annuus plant species isn't us eful 208
for gathering Pb in their tissues appeared differently in relation to other heavy metals . 209
210
BAC BCF TF0.00.20.40.60.81.0Concentration (mg/kg)
Control Environment Cd Pb
211
Fig.A3 H. annuss plant BAC, BCF and TF values in control environment 212
213

Sustainability 2021 , 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 10
BAC BCF TF0.00.20.40.60.81.0Concentration (mg/kg)
Open Environment Cd Pb
214
Fig.A4 H. annuss plant BAC, BCF and TF values in open environment 215
4. Conclusions 216
This investigation was conducted to recognize efficiency of H. annuus through ex- 217
pulsion of Cd as well Pb from dirty soil. Acquired outcomes indicated that H. annuus 218
plant in their tissues (roots and shoots) can absorb Cd as well Pb. Regardless, gathering of 219
Pb in plant root was mor sure than Cd. For Cd, accumulation of BAF was more than 1, 220
showing its capacity for metal particle take -up. Furthermore, BAF values of Pb for all anal- 221
ysis didn't abundance than 1. Translocation Factor (TF) accentuation capability of H. an- 222
nuus for gathering more quantity of Cd contrasted to Pb. Extra assessments are relied 223
upon to investigate Phytoremediation execution of H. Annuus for metals in combine plant 224
development grad ual evaluation as well chelating to support flow adequacy of metals. 225
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, B.; methodology, B.; software, B.; validation, Q.W .; re- 226
sources, K.S.A .; M.N. and A.K. ; data curation, K.S.A .; M.N . and A.K. ; writing —original draf t prep- 227
aration, B.; writing —review and editing, B. and Q.W .; supervision, Q.W . All authors have read and 228
agreed to the published version of the manuscript. 229
Funding: This work was supported in part by China National Critical Project for Science and Tech- 230
nology on Water Pollution Prevention and Control (No. 2017ZX07202005 -005), the National Key 231
Research and Development Program of China (No. 2019YFC0408304) and the National Natural Sci- 232
ence Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 21876025) . 233
Conflicts of Interest : The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or 234
personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. 235
References 236
[1]. Dermatas, D., Braida, W., Christodoulatos, C., Strigul, N., Panikov , N., Los, M. and Larson, S., 2004. Solubility, sorption, and soil 237
respiration effects of tungsten and tungsten alloys. Environmental forensics , 5(1), pp.5 -13. 238
View article 239
[2]. Lee, I.S., Kim, O.K., Chang, Y.Y., Bae, B., Kim, H.H. and Baek, K.H., 2002. Heavy metal concentrations and enzyme activities in 240
soil from a contaminated Kore an shooting range. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering , 94(5), pp.406 -411. 241
View article 242
[3]. Brennan, M.A. and Shelley, M.L., 1999. A model of the uptake, translocation, and accumulation of lead (Pb) by maize for the 243
purpose of phytoextraction. Ecological Engineering , 12(3-4), pp.271 -297. 244
View article 245

Sustainability 2021 , 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 10
[4]. Selvam, A. and Wong, J.W.C., 2009. Cadmium uptake potential of Brassica napus cocropped with Brassica parachinensis and Zea 246
mays. Journal of hazardous materials , 167(1-3), pp.170 -178. 247
View article 248
[5]. Keller C., 2004. Project -number: BBW C99.0062, 01.07.2000, 31.01. 249
View article 250
[6]. Purakayastha, T.J., Viswanath, T., Bhadraray, S., Chhonkar, P.K., Adhikari, P.P. and Suribabu, K., 2008. Phytoextraction of z inc, 251
copper, nickel and lead from a contaminated soil by different species of Brassica. International journal o f phytoremediation , 10(1), pp.61 – 252
72. 253
View article 254
[7]. Abdel‐Sabour, M.F. and Al‐Salama, Y.J., 2007. Zinc and cobalt phytoextraction by different plant species. Remediat ion Journal: The 255
Journal of Environmental Cleanup Costs, Technologies & Techniques , 18(1), pp.109 -119. 256
View article 257
[8]. Neugschwandtner, R.W., Tlustoš, P., Száková, J., Komárek, M. and Jakoubková, L., 2017. MONITORING OF MOBILIZATION 258
AND UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS IN RESPONSE TO EDTA ADDITIONS TO A CONTAMINATED AGRICULTURAL 259
SOIL. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ) , 16(11). 260
View article 261
[9]. Eleni, C., Jana, K., Nicolas, K., 2005. Environ. Int. 31, 255 –262. Grispen, V.M.J., Nelissen, H.J.M., Verkleij, J.A.C., 2006. E nviron. 262
Pollut. 144, 77 –83. 263
View article 264
[10]. Aggarwal, H. and Goyal, D., 20 07. Phytoremediation of some heavy metals by agronomic crops. Developments in environmental 265
science , 5, pp.79 -98. 266
View article 267
[11]. Marchiol, L., Assolari, S., Sacco, P. and Zerbi, G., 2004. Phytoextraction of heavy metals by canola (Brassica napus) and rad ish 268
(Raphanus sativus) grown on multicontaminated soil. Environmental Pollution , 132(1), pp.21 -27. 269
View article 270
[12]. Kumar, P.N., Dushenkov, V., Motto, H. and Raskin, I., 1995. Phytoextraction: the use of plants to remove heavy metals from 271
soils. Environmental science & technology , 29(5), pp.1232 -1238. 272
View article 273
[13]. Annie, M., Paz -AlbertoGilbert, C., Igua, B.G. and Prudente, B.J.A., 2007. Phytoextraction of lead -contaminated soil using 274
vetivergrass (Vetiveria zizanioides L.), cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica L.) and carabaograss (Paspalum conjugatum 275
L.). Environm ental Science and Pollution Research -International , pp.498 -504. 276
View article 277
[14]. Wilde, E.W., Brigmon, R.L., Dunn, D.L., Heitkamp, M.A. and Dagnan, D.C., 2005. Phytoextraction of lead from firing range soil 278
by Vetiver grass. Chemosphere , 61(10), pp.1451 -1457. 279
View article 280
[15]. Japenga, J., Koopmans, G.F., Song, J. and Römkens, P.F.A.M., 2007. A feasibility test to estimate the durat ion of phytoextraction 281
of heavy metals from polluted soils. International Journal of Phytoremediation , 9(2), pp.115 -132. 282
View article 283
[16]. Houston, M.C., 2007. The role of mercury and cadmium heavy metals in vascular disease, hypertension, coronary heart disease, 284
and myocardial infarction. Altern Ther Health Med , 13(2), pp.S128 -S133. 285
View article 286

Sustainability 2021 , 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 10
[17]. Blaylock , M.J., Salt, D.E., Dushenkov, S., Zakharova, O., Gussman, C., Kapulnik, Y., Ensley, B.D. and Raskin, I., 1997. Enhanced 287
accumulation of Pb in Indian mustard by soil -applied chelating agents. Environmental Science & Technology , 31(3), pp.860 -865. 288
View article 289
[18]. Turgut, C., Pepe, M.K. and Cutright, T.J., 2004. The effect of EDTA and citric acid on phytoremediation of Cd, Cr, and Ni fro m 290
soil using Helianthus annuus. Environmental pollution , 131(1), pp.147 -154. 291
View article 292
[19]. Sundar A.S., Rupali D., Dibyendu S., Sumathi S.K.P.M., 2007. GS ADenver Annual Meeting (paper no. 22 -15), pp. 28 –31. 293
View article 294
[20]. Komárek, M., Tlustoš, P., Száková, J., Chrastný, V. and Ettler, V., 2007. The use of maize and poplar in chelant -enhanced 295
phytoextraction of lead from contaminated agricultural soils. Chemosphere , 67(4), pp.640 -651. 296
View article 297
[21]. Liu, D., Islam , E., Ma, J., Wang, X., Mahmood, Q., Jin, X., Li, T., Yang, X. and Gupta, D., 2008. Optimization of chelator -assisted 298
phytoextraction, using EDTA, lead and Sedum alfredii Hance as a model system. Bulletin of environmental contamination and 299
toxicology , 81(1), pp.30 -35. 300
View article 301
[22]. Hovsepyan, A. and Greipsson, S., 2004. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on phytoextraction by corn (Zea mays) of lead – 302
contaminat ed soil. International Journal of Phytoremediation , 6(4), pp.305 -321. 303
View article 304
[23]. Lin, C., Li u, J., Liu, L., Zhu, T., Sheng, L. and Wang, D., 2009. Soil amendment application frequency contributes to 305
phytoextraction of lead by sunflower at different nutrient levels. Environmental and Experimental Botany , 65(2-3), pp.410 -416. 306
View article 307
[24]. Sinegani, A.S. and Khalilikhah, F., 2008. Phytoextraction of lead by Helianthus annuus: effect of mobilising agent applicatio n 308
time. Plant Soil Environ , 54(10), pp.434 -440. 309
View article 310
[25]. Miller, G., Begonia, G., Begonia, M., Ntoni, J. and Hundley, O., 2008. Assessment of the efficacy of chelate -assisted 311
phytoextraction of lead by coffeeweed (Sesbania exaltata Raf.). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 5(5), 312
pp.428 -435. 313
View article 314
[26]. Bell, P.F., Chaney, R.L. and Angle, J.S., 1991. Free metal activity and total metal concentrations as indices of micronutrient 315
availability to barley [Hordeum vulgare (L.)‘Klages’]. Plant and soil , 130(1-2), pp.51 -62. 316
View article 317
[27]. Edgell, K., 1988. USEPA Method Stu dy 37 – SW-846 Method 3050 1988, Contract No. 68 -03-3254. EPA. 318
View article 319
[28]. Radajevic, M. and Bashkin, V.N., 1999. Practical environmental analysis. Royal school of chemistry, Thomas Graham 320
house. Science Park Cambridge, UK , p.4. 321
View article 322
[29]. Malik, R.N., Husain, S.Z. and Nazir, I., 2010. Heavy metal contamination and accumulation in soil and wild plant species from 323
industrial area of Islamabad, Pakistan. Pak J Bot , 42(1), pp.291 -301. 324
View Article 325
[30]. Khan, N. and Bano, A., 2016. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and Ag -nano particle in the bioremediation of heavy 326
metals and maize growth under municipal wastewater irrigation. International journal of phytoremedia tion, 18(3), pp.211 -221. 327
View Article 328

Sustainability 2021 , 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 10
[31]. Furlow, J.J., 1979. The systematics of the American species of Alnus (Betulaceae). Rhodora , 81(825), pp.1 -121. 329
View Article 330
[32]. Li, C.Y., Jiang, L.Y., Chen, W.Y., Li, K., Sheng, H.Q., Ni, Y., Lu, J.X., Xu, W.X., Zhang, S.Y. and Shi, Q.X., 2010. CFTR is essential 331
for sperm fertilizing capacity and is correlated w ith sperm quality in humans. Human reproduction , 25(2), pp.317 -327. 332
View Article 333
[33]. Ahmad, I., Akhtar, M.J., Zahir, Z.A. and Mitter, B., 2015. Organic amendments: effects on cereals growth and cadmiu m 334
remediation. International journal of environmental science and technology , 12(9), pp.2919 -2928. 335
View Article 336
[34]. Greger, M., 1999. Metal availability and bioconcentration in plants. In Heavy metal stress in plants (pp. 1 -27). Springer, Berlin, 337
Heidelberg. 338
View article 339
[35]. Pilon -Smits, E., 2005. Phytoremediation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. , 56, pp.15 -39. 340
View article 341
[36]. Rizwan, M., Ali, S., Rizvi, H., Rinklebe, J., Tsang, D.C., Meers, E., Ok, Y.S. and Ishaque, W., 2016. Phytomanagement of heavy 342
metals in contaminated soils using sunflower: a review. Critical reviews in environmental science and technology , 46(18), pp.1498 -1528. 343
View article 344
[37]. Jadia, C.D . and Fulekar, M.H., 2008. Phytoremediation: The application of vermicompost to remove zinc, cadmium, copper, 345
nickel and lead by sunflower plant. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ) , 7(5). 346
View article 347
[38]. Forte, J. and Mutiti, S., 2017. Phytoremediation potential of Helianthus annuus and Hydrangea paniculata in copper and lead – 348
contaminated soil. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution , 228(2), p.77. 349
View article 350
[39]. Lee, K.K., Cho, H.S., Moon, Y.C., Ban, S.J. and Kim, J.Y., 2013. Cadmium and lead uptake capacity of energy crops and 351
distribution of metals within the plant str uctures. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering , 17(1), pp.44 -50. 352
View article 353